Automated Visual Perception-Based Web Browser Rendering Results Comparison with Multi-part Fragment Image Matching

  • Julian Myrcha
  • Przemysław Rokita
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8671)

Abstract

A difference measurement method for similar web pages is proposed. Displaying same html documents on a different browsers or different browser versions may produce different results, when compared as images. They may be visually indistinguishable or may visually differ. There are many factors causing that differences. There are ones - as advertisements introduced or changed randomly by some sites, which should be handled accordingly. The proposed method automatically register different part of compared images and employ VDP method to produce visual difference map and compute difference coefficients. Obtained results shows, that it is possible properly compare web pages even if part of them change sizes causing translation of the resulting content. Proposed system was realised as a part of the automated testing environment suited to perform regression tests for browser engines.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpuente, M., Romero, D.: A visual technique for web pages comparison. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 235(C), 3–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, B., Meyer, G.W., Klassen, R.V.: A Comparison of Two Image Quality Models. In: Proc. SPIE 3299, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, p. 98 (July 17, 1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, L.G.: A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. (December 1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daly, S.: The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In: Watson, A.B. (ed.) Digital Images and Human Vision, pp. 179–206. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eglin, V., Bres, S.: Document page similarity based on layout visual saliency: Application to query by example and document classification. In: ICDAR 2003: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Washington, DC, USA, p. 1208. IEEE Computer Society (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gopalakrishnan, G., Kumar, B., Narayanan, A., Mullick, R.: A Fast Piece-wise Deformable Method for Multi-Modality Image Registration. In: Proceedings of the 34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isgrò, F., Pilu, M.: A fast and robust image registration method based on an early consensus paradigm. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (June 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, W., Jay Kuo, C.: -C.: Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 22(4), 297–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lubin, J.: A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In: Vision Models For Target Detection And Recognition, pp. 245–283. World Scientific Publishing Company (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mantiuk, R., Kim, K.J., Rempel, A.G., Heidrich, W.: HDR-VDP-2: a calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. ACM Trans. Graph 30, 40:1–40:14 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peng, H., Long, F., Siu, W.-C., Chi, Z., Feng, D.D.: Document image matching based on component blocks. In: Proceedings of the ICIP 2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun, C., Cai, R.: Document Image Registration Using Geometric Invariance and Hausdorff Distance. In: Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, vol. 02 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takama, Y., Mitsuhashi, N.: Visual Similarity Comparison for Web Page Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tolhurst, D.J., Ripamonti, C., Párraga, C.A., Lovell, P.G., Troscianko, T.: A multiresolution color model for visual difference prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 135–138.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao, X., Lu, W., Tao, D., Li, X.: Image quality assessment and human visual system. In: Proc. SPIE 7744, Visual Communications and Image Processing (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yee, Y.H., Newman, A.: A perceptual metric for production testing. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Sketches (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu, Y., Dai, R., Xiao, B., Wang, C.: Document Image Registration Based on Geometric Invariant and Contour Matching. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 2007), vol. 03 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zitová, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 21(11), 977–1000 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Myrcha
    • 1
  • Przemysław Rokita
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceWarsaw Uniwersity of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations