Blending Concept Maps with Online Labs for STEM Learning

  • Raghu Raman
  • Mithun Haridas
  • Prema Nedungadi
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 320)

Abstract

In this paper we describe the architecture of an e-learning environment that blends concept maps with Online Labs (OLabs) to enhance student performance in biology. In the Indian context, a secondary school student’s conceptual understanding of hard topics in biology is at risk because of a lack of qualified teachers and necessary equipments in labs to conduct experiments. Concept map provides a visual framework which allows students to get an overview of a concept, its various sub concepts and their relationships and linkages.  OLabs with its animations, videos and simulations is an interactive, immersive approach for practicing science experiments. The blended e-learning environment was tested by systematically developing a concept map for the concept “Photosynthesis” and by successfully integrating it into the OLabs environment. Our blended approach to concept understanding has interesting implications for the teacher who is engaged in training programs.

Keywords

Concept Map OLabs Biology Photosynthesis simulations animations online labs virtual labs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shahaf, D., Guestrin, C., Horvitz, E.: Trains of thought: Generating information maps. In: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 899–908 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ritchhart, R., Turner, T., Hadar, L.: Uncovering students’ thinking about thinking using concept maps. Metacognition and Learning 4, 145–159 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, pp. 1–36. IHMCC (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crampes, M., Ranwez, S., Villerd, J., Velickovski, F., Mooney, C., Emery, A., Mille, N.: Concept maps for designing adaptive knowledge maps. Inf. Vis. 5, 211–224 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olney, A.M.: Extraction of Concept Maps from Textbooks for Domain Modeling. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 390–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borda, E.J., Burgess, D.J., Plog, C.J., Luce, M.M.: Concept Maps as Tools for Assessing Students’ Epistemologies of Science. Electron. J. Sci. Educ. 13, 160–184 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hao, J.X., Kwok, R.C.W., Lau, R.Y.K., Yu, A.Y.: Predicting problem-solving performance with concept maps: An information-theoretic approach. Decision Support Syst. 48, 613–621 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gould, P., White, R.: Mental Maps. Penguin Books, New York 197Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tekkaya, C.: Remediating high schools’ misconception concerning diffusion and osmosis through mapping and conceptual change text. Res. Sci. Tech. Edu., 21, 5–16Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ajaja, O.P.: Concept Mapping As a Study skill: Effect on Students Achievement in Biology. Int. J. Sci. 3(1), 49–57 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kowata, J.H., Cury, D., Silva Boeres, M.C.: Concept maps core elements candidates recognition from text. In: Proc. of Fourth Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, pp. 120–127 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., Cañas, A.J.: Concept Maps: A Theoretical Note on Concepts and the Need for Cyclic Concept Maps. Sci. Teach. 42, 741–766 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bamidele, E.F., Oloyede, E.O.: Comparative Effectiveness of Hierarchical, Flowchart and Spider Concept Mapping Strategies on Students’ Performance in Chemistry. World J. Edu. 3, 66 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Starr, R.R., Parente de Oliveira, J.M.: Concept maps as the first step in an ontology construction method. Information Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beel, J., Gipp, B., Stiller, J.-O.: Information retrieval on mind maps - what could it be good for? In: 2009 5th Int. Conf. Collab. Comput. Networking, Appl. Work (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., Cañas, A.J.: Experiments on the effect of map structure and concept quantification during concept map construction. In: Proc. of First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, pp. 209–216 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corballis, M.: Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain and Cognition 53, 171–176 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagemans, M.G., Meij, H.D., Jong, T.D.: The Effects of a Concept Map-Based Support Tool on Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning. Jrnl. Edu. Psy. 105(1), 1–24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raghu Raman
    • 1
  • Mithun Haridas
    • 1
  • Prema Nedungadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations