Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning with Sensor-Data in the School: Effects on Student Motivation

  • Olga Firssova
  • Marco Kalz
  • Dirk Börner
  • Fleur Prinsen
  • Ellen Rusman
  • Stefaan Ternier
  • Marcus Specht
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8719)

Abstract

The paper discusses the design, implementation and evaluation of a pilot project that integrated inquiry-based learning with mobile game design and introduced mobile devices and sensors into classroom learning. A 5-week classroom inquiry learning project on energy consumption was designed and implemented as a mobile serious game. While engaging in the game and training inquiry skills, students were introduced to basic concepts in the energy domain and to everyday practices of energy consumption in their direct environment. The design was based on a model of inquiry-based science learning with social and open mobile tools developed in the European research project weSPOT. The pilot indicated that using an ubiquitous tool does not necessarily help sustain student motivation. There are indications of gender differences in motivation related to use of mobile devices for learning. These differences should be taken into account in the design of activities. Implementation of the inquiry-based learning model in conjunction with a mobile game scenario into the school practice confirmed the importance of good design with sufficient testing and teacher ownership.

Keywords

mobile learning motivation inquiry-based learning environmental literacy energy consumption design implementation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ally, M.: Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training. Athabasca University Press, Athabasca (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Specht, M.: Learning in a Technology Enhanced World. OCÉ, Maastricht (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park, Y.: A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(2), 78–96 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell, S.W.: Perceptions of Mobile Phones in College Classrooms: Ringing, Cheating, and Classroom Policies. Communication Education 55(3), 280–294 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Bannon, B.W., Thomas, K.: Teacher Perceptions of Using Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Age Matters! Computers and Education 74, 515–525 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ally, M.: Introduction. In: Ally, M. (ed.) Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, pp. 1–6. Athabasca University Press, Athabasca (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., Vavuola, G.: Mobile learning: Small Devices, Big Issues. In: Ludvigsen, S., Balacheff, N., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds.) Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products, pp. 233–249. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong, L.-H., Looi, C.-K.: What Seams Do We Remove in Mobile Assisted Seamless Learning? A Critical Review of the Literature. Computers and Education 57(4), 2364–2381 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ernst, J.: Factors Associated with K–12 Teachers’ Use of Environment-Based Education. The Journal of Environmental Education 38(3), 5–31 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zorgafakis, N., Menegaki, A.N., Tsagarakis, P.: Effective Education for Energy Efficiency. Energy Policy 36, 3226–3232 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Energy Literacy, Essential Principles and Fundamental Concepts for Energy Education US Dept. of Energy (2011), http://www.globalchange.gov
  12. 12.
    United Nations Environment Programme. GEO-s. Global Environment Outlook. Technical report, New York, NY (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Volk, T.L., Cheak, M.J.: The Effects of an Environmental Education Program on Students, Parents, and Community. The Journal of Environmental Education 34(4), 12–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ernst, J., Monroe, M.: The Effects of Environment-Based Education on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Disposition toward Critical Thinking. Environmental Education Research 10(4), 507–522 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers, Y., Conolly, K., Hazlewood, W., Tedesco, L.: Enhancing Learning: a Study of How Mobile Devices Can Facilitate Sensemaking. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 14, 111–124 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Börner, D., Storm, J., Kalz, M., Specht, M.: Energy Awareness Displays: Motivating Conservation at the Workplace through Feedback. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 6(3/4), 189–203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalz, M., Börner, D., Ternier, S., Specht, M.: Mindergie: A Pervasive Learning Game for Pro-Environmental Behaviour at the Workplace. In: Wong, L.H., Milrad, M., Specht, M. (eds.) Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity, Springer, Heidelberg (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Rens, L., Pilot, A., van der Schee, J.: A Framework for Teaching Scientific Inquiry in Upper Secondary School Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(7), 788–806 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edelson, D., Gordin, D., Pea, R.: Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of Learning Science 8, 391–450 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M.: Orchestrating Inquiry Learning. Routledge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sandberg, J., Maris, M., de Geus, K.: Mobile English Learning: An Evidence-Based Study with Fifth Graders. Computers & Education 57, 1334–1347 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Song, Y.: “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for Seamless Science Inquiry in a Primary School. Computers & Education 74, 50–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmitz, B., Klemke, R., Specht, M.: Effects of Mobile Gaming Patterns on Learning Outcomes: A Literature Review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4(5-6), 345–358 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ternier, S., Klemke, R., Kalz, M., van Ulzen, P., Specht, M.: ARLearn: Augmented Reality Meets Augmented Virtuality. Journal of Universal Computer Science 18(15), 2143–2164 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalz, M., Firssova, O., Boerner, D., Ternier, S., Prinsen, F., Rusman, E., Drachsler, H., Specht, M.: Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning for Sustainability Education in Secondary Schools: Effects on Knowledge and Motivation. In: Sampsons, D., Spector, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the The 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies - ICALT 2014: Advanced Technologies for Supporting Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning, Athens, Greece, July 7-9 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Protopsaltis, A., Seitlinger, P., Chaimala, F., Firssova, O., Hetzner, S., Kikis-Papadakis, K., Boytchev, P.: Working environment with social and personal open tools for inquiry based learning: Pedagogic and Diagnostic Frameworks. The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning (in press)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tafoya, E., Sunal, D., Knecht, P.: Assessing Inquiry Potential: A Tool for Curriculum Decision Makers. School Science and Mathematics 80(1), 43–48 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mikroyannidis, A., Okada, A., Scott, P., Rusman, E., Specht, M., Stefanov, K., …, Chaimala, F.: weSPOT: A Personal and Social Approach to Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science 19(14), 2093–2111 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 4th edn. Sage, London (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 54–67 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Firssova
    • 1
  • Marco Kalz
    • 1
  • Dirk Börner
    • 1
  • Fleur Prinsen
    • 1
  • Ellen Rusman
    • 1
  • Stefaan Ternier
    • 1
  • Marcus Specht
    • 1
  1. 1.Welten Institute - Research Centre for Learning, Teaching and TechnologyOpen University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations