Moodle4SPOC: A Resource-Intensive Blended Learning Course
The paper reports on the transformation of a master level university course (lecture style) by supplementing it with a “small private online course” (SPOC). The online course included micro learning elements and activities that are often used in the context of MOOCs like lecture videos or auto-grading tests, but also provided a platform for publishing content that was generated by the students in group work. Technically, the online course was conducted in a Moodle LMS that was extended by a self-developed video-plugin. The experience was evaluated using two questionnaires and the results were discussed with the students to gain further insights. The evaluation results are critically discussed to identify success factors and pitfalls for resource-intensive blended learning scenarios.
Keywordsblended learning small private online courses lecture support lecture videos group learning peer reviewing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Belanger, Y., Thornton, J.: Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach - duke university’s first mooc (2013), http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/Duke_Bioelectricity_MOOC_Fall2012.pdf
- 3.Fini, A.: The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the cck08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10(5) (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Kop, R., Hill, A.: Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 9(3) (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.Graham, C.R.: Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In: The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. John Wiley & Sons (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online-learning studies. Technical report. US Department of Education, Washington, DC (2009), http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
- 9.von Ahn, L.: Games with a purpose. Computer 39, 96–98 (2006)Google Scholar
- 10.Hecking, T., Ziebarth, S., Hoppe, H.U.: Analysis of dynamic resource access patterns in a blended learning course, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, pp. 173–182. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Gartner, A., Conway Kohler, M., Riessman, F.: Children teach children. Learning by teaching. Harper & Row, New York (1971)Google Scholar
- 13.Papert, S., Harel, I.: Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1991)Google Scholar
- 14.Aronson, E., Patnoe, S.: The Jigsaw Classroom: Building Cooperation in the Classroom, 2nd edn. Longman, New York (1997)Google Scholar