Advertisement

Metacognitive Skill Development and Applied Systems Science: A Framework of Metacognitive Skills, Self-regulatory Functions and Real-World Applications

  • Michael J. Hogan
  • Christopher P. Dwyer
  • Owen M. Harney
  • Chris Noone
  • Ronan J. Conway
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 76)

Abstract

Metacognition, or thinking about thinking [1], refers to the application and regulation of cognitive processes. According to Boekaerts and Simons [2], Brown [3] and Ku and Ho [4], individuals think metacognitively in two ways: first, individuals must be aware of their own cognitive processes (e.g., through self-monitoring or self-regulation); second, individuals must be able to apply available cognitive processes for purposes of learning or devising solutions to problems [e.g., using critical thinking or reflective judgment [5]. Though a topic of research interest for almost 40 years, debate continues as to how best to conceptualise metacognition and cultivate metacognitive ability. However, due to what can be considered an exponential increase in the creation of new information every year [6, 7], higher-order, metacognitive skills are needed more than ever in order to aid individuals and groups in becoming more adaptable, flexible and better able to cope in the context of a rapidly evolving information society. In order to help guide the facilitation of metacognitive understanding in educational and applied settings, this chapter draws upon recent research in the learning sciences to propose a new framework of metacognition. Specifically, we outline a model of metacognition that integrates processes associated with self-other representations, executive function, emotion regulation, mindfulness, motivation, thinking dispositions, critical thinking, reflective judgment and collaborative systems thinking skills, which can be fostered in the context of individual and team-based tool use. Two cases studies are presented, which provide evidence for the value of both argument mapping and collective intelligence tools in facilitating the development of higher-order critical, reflective and collaborative metacognitive thinking skills. The chapter concludes with a number of recommendations for future research on applied systems science and metacognitive skills development.

Keywords

Critical thinking Reflective judgment Mindfulness Executive functioning Self-regulation Argument mapping Collective intelligence 

Abbreviations

AM

Argument mapping

CACS

Conversational argument coding scheme

CSCL

Computer-supported collaborative learning

CT

Critical thinking

IM

Interactive management

RJ

Reflective judgment

RJM

Reflective judgment model

References

  1. 1.
    Flavell, J.: Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick, L. (ed.) The Nature of Intelligence, pp. 231–236. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boekaerts, M., Simons, P.R.J.: Leren en Instructie: Psychologie van de Leerling en het leerproces [Learning and Instruction: Psychology of the Learner and His Learning Process]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, A.: Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert, F., Kluwe, R. (eds.) Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, pp. 65–116. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ku, K.Y.L., Ho, I.T.: Dispositional factors predicting chinese students’ critical thinking performance. Personal. Individ. Differ. 48(1), 54–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawson, T.L.: Metacognition and learning in adulthood. Prepared in response to tasking from ODNI/CHCO/IC Leadership Development Office, Developmental Testing Service, LLC Northhampton, MA (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darling-Hammond, L.: How can we teach for meaningful learning? In: Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P.D., Schoenfeld, A.H., Stage, E.K., Zimmerman, T.D., Cervetti, G.N., Tilson, J.L. (eds.) Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding, pp. 1–10. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jukes, I., McCain, T.: Minds in Play: Computer Game Design as a Context Of Children’s Learning. Erlbaum, New Jersey (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer, K.W.: A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychol. Rev. 87(6), 431–477 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warfield, J.N.: An Introduction to Systems Science. World Scientific, Singapore (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogan, M.J., Harney, O., Broome B.: Integrating argument mapping with systems thinking tools—advancing applied systems science. In: Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sherborne, T. (eds.) Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Wittrock, M.C.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, abridged edition. Longman, White Plains (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demetriou, A.: Organisation and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: toward a general theory. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation, pp. 209–251. Academic Press, London (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhn, D.: A Developmental model of critical thinking. Educ. Res. 28(2), 16–25 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hofer, B.K.: Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educ. Psychol. 39(1), 43–55 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magno, C.: The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacogn. Learn. 5(2), 137–156 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pintrich, P.R.: The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation, pp. 451–502. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Presseisen, B.Z.: Thinking skills: meanings and models revisited. In: Costa, A.L. (ed.) Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking, vol. 1, pp. 47–53. ASCD Publications, Alexandria (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schraw, G., Dennison, R.S.: Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 19(4), 460–475 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st Century. Think. Skills Creativity 12, 43–52 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ku, K.Y.L., Ho, I.T.: Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacogn. Learn. 5(3), 251–267 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhn, D.: Metacognitive development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 9(5), 178–181 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer, K.W., Bidell, T.R.: Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In: Damon W., Lerner, R.M. (eds.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development, 6th edn., pp. 313–399. Wiley, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hogan, M.J., Harney O.: A proposal for systems science education. In: Wegerif, R., Kaufman, J., Li, L. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (in press)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: An examination of the effects of argument mapping on students’ memory and comprehension performance. Think. Skills Creativity. 8, 11–24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harney, O., Hogan, M.J., Broome, B.: Collaborative learning: the effects of trust and open and closed dynamics on consensus and efficacy. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 15(4), 517–532 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahneman, D.: Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin, Great Britain (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reyna, V.F., Farley, F.: Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 7(1), 1–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lieberman, M.D.: Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. In: Forgas, J.P., Villiams, K.D., Von-Hippel, W. (eds.) Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes, Vol. 5, pp. 44–67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.: Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23(5), 645–665 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hammond, K.R.: Upon reflection. Think. Reason. 2(2–3), 239–248 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hamm, R.M.: Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum. Professional judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making, pp. 78–105 (1988)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cader, R., Campbell, S., Watson, D.: Cognitive continuum theory in nursing decision-making. J. Adv. Nurs. 49(4), 397–405 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gestsdottir, S., Lerner, R.M.: Positive development in adolescence: the development and role of intentional self-regulation. Hum. Dev. 51(3), 202–224 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Labouvie-Vief, G.: Self-with-other representations and the organization of the self. J. Res. Pers. 39(1), 185–205 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harter, S.: Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: a life-span perspective. In: Sternberg, R., Kolligian, J. (eds.) Competence Considered, pp. 67–97. Yale University Press, New Haven (1990)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.: Working memory. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 8, pp. 47–90. Academic Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cowan, N.: What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Prog. Brain Res. 169, 323–338 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Duff, K., Schoenberg, M.R., Scott, J.G., Adams, R.L.: The relationship between executive functioning and verbal and visual learning and memory. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 20(1), 111–122 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., Wager, T.D.: The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 41(1), 49–100 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Norman, D., Shallice, T.: Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In: Gazzaniga, M. (ed.) Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reader. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Norman, D.A., Shallice, T.: Attention to Action. Springer, US (1986)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Burton, C.L., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D.F., Hunter, M.A.: Cognitive functioning and everyday problem solving in older adults. Clin. Neuropsychol. 20(3), 432–452 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., Bruine de Bruin, W.: Executive functions in decision making: an individual differences approach. Think. Reason. 16(2), 69–97 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B.J., Baddeley, A.D.: Executive functions and self–regulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16(3), 174–180 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brewin, C.R., Smart, L.: Working memory capacity and suppression of intrusive thoughts. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psych. 36(1), 61–68 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R.W., Schmitt, M.: Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95(4), 962–977 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nederkoorn, C., Houben, K., Hofmann, W., Roefs, A., Jansen, A.: Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychol. Off. J. Div. Health Psychol. 29(4), 389–393 (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pronk, T.M., Karremans, J.C., Wigboldus, D.H.J.: How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100(5), 827–837 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Northam, E., Taylor, H.: Standardization of the contingency naming test (CNT) for school-aged children: a measure of reactive flexibility. Clin. Neuropsychol. Assess. 1, 247–273 (2000)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Lajoie, G.: The tower of london test: validation and standardization for pediatric populations. Clin. Neuropsychol. 10(1), 54–65 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Welsh, M.C., Pennington, B.F., Groisser, D.B.: A normative developmental study of executive function: a window on prefrontal function in children. Develop. Neuropsychol. 7(2), 131–149 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Garth, J.: Assessment and development of organizational ability: the rey complex figure organizational strategy score (RCF-OSS). Clin. Neuropsychol. 15(1), 81–94 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sowell, E.R., Trauner, D.A., Gamst, A., Jernigan, T.L.: Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: a structural mri study. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 44(1), 4–16 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Keating, D.P.: Cognitive and brain development. In: Lerner, R., Steinberg, L. (eds.) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 45–84. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z.V., Abbey, S., Velting, D, Devins, G.: Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Practice. 11(3), 230–241 (2004)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Holas, P., Jankowski, T.: A cognitive perspective on mindfulness. Int. J. Psychol. 48(3), 232–243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brown, K.W., Ryan, R.M., Creswell, J.D.: Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychol. Inquiry Int. J. Adv. Psychol.Theor. 18(4), 211–237 (2007)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hart, R., Ivtzan, I., Hart, D.: Mind the gap in mindfulness research: a comparative account of the leading schools of thought. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17(4), 453–466 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Anicha, C.L., Ode, S., Moeller, S.K., Robinson, M.D.: Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. J. Pers. 80(2), 255–285 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Teper, R., Inzlicht, M.: Meditation, mindfulness and executive control: the importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8(1), 85–92 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Teper, R., Segal, Z.V., Inzlicht, M.: Inside the mindful mind: how mindfulness enhances emotion regulation through improvements in executive control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22(6), 449–454 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Moore, A., Malinowski, P.: Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Conscious. Cogn. 18(1), 176–186 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lilja, J.L., Lundh, L.G., Josefsson, T., Falkenström, F.: Observing as an essential facet of mindfulness: a Comparison of FFMQ patterns in meditating and non-meditating individuals. Mindfulness 4(3), 203–212 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chiesa, A., Calati, R., Serretti, A.: Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 31(3), 449–464 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sirois, F.M., Tosti, N.: Lost in the moment? An investigation of procrastination, mindfulness, and well-being. J. Rational-Emot. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 30(4), 237–248 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Libby, D.J., Worhunsky, P.D., Pilver, C.E., Brewer, J.A.: Meditation-induced changes in high-frequency heart rate variability predict smoking outcomes. Front. Human Neurosci. 6, 54 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Evans, D.R., Baer, R.A., Segerstrom, S.C.: The effects of mindfulness and self-consciousness on persistence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 47(4), 379–382 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ostafin, B.D., Bauer, C., Myxter, P.: Mindfulness decouples the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and heavy drinking. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 31(7), 729–745 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hofmann, S.G., Sawyer, A.T., Witt, A.A., Oh, D.: The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 78(2), 169–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chan, D., Woollacott, M.: Effects of level of meditation experience on attentional focus: is the efficiency of executive or orientation networks improved? J. Altern. Complement. Med. 13(6), 651–657 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Allen, M., Dietz, M., Blair, K.S., van Beek, M., Rees, G., Vestergaard-Poulsen, P., Roepstorff, A.: Cognitive-affective neural plasticity following active-controlled mindfulness intervention. J. Neurosci. 32(44), 15601–15610 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wenk-Sormaz, H.: Meditation can reduce habitual responding. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 11(2), 42–58 (2005)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K.A., Lawlor, M.S., Thomson, K.C.: Mindfulness and inhibitory control in early adolescence. J. Early Adoles. 32(4), 565–588 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chambers, R., Lo, B.C.Y., Allen, N.B.: The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional control, cognitive style, and affect. Cogn. Ther. Res. 32(3), 303–322 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zeidan, F., Johnson, S.K., Diamond, B.J., David, Z., Goolkasian, P.: Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Conscious. Cogn. 19(2), 597–605 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Glomb, T.M., Duffy, M.K., Bono, J.E., Yang, T.: Mindfulness at work. Res. Personnel Human Res. Manage. 30, 115–157 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ostafin, B.D., Kassman, K.T.: Stepping out of history: mindfulness improves insight problem solving. Conscious. Cogn. 21(2), 1031–1036 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ruedy, N.E., Schweitzer, M.E.: In the moment: the effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. J. Bus. Ethics 95(1), 73–87 (2011)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Shapiro, S.L., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P.R.: Mindfulness-based stress reduction effects on moral reasoning and decision making. J. Pos. Psychol. 7(6), 504–515 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Colzato, L.S., Ozturk, A., Hommel, B.: Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Front. Psychol. 3, 116–131 (2012)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Evans, J.S.B.T., Stanovich, K.E.: Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8(3), 223–241 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jost, J.T., Kruglanski, A.W., Nelson, T.O.: Social metacognition: an expansionist review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2(2), 137–154 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reb, J., Narayanan, J., Chaturvedi, S.: Leading mindfully: two studies on the influence of supervisor trait mindfulness on employee well-being and performance. Mindfulness 5(1), 36–45 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Van Doesum, N.J., Van Lange, D.W., van lange, P.M.: social mindfulness: skill and will to Navigate the Social World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 105(1), 86–103 (2013)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Barnes, S., Brown, K.W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W.K., Rogge, R.D.: The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. J. Marital Family Ther. 33(4), 482–500 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wachs, K., Cordova, J.V.: Mindful relating: exploring mindfulness and emotion repertoires in intimate relationships. J. Marital Family Ther. 33(4), 464–481 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Facione, P.A.: The Delphi Report: Committee on Pre-college Philosophy. California Academic Press, Millbrae (1990)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Reeves, M.F.: An application of bloom’s taxonomy to the teaching of business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 9(7), 609–616 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: The Promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping. In: Horvart, C.P., Forte, J.M. (eds.) Critical Thinking, pp. 97–122. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: The Evaluation of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction as a method of enhancing reflective judgment performance (in preparation)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool: Comparing the effects of map reading versus text reading on comprehension and recall of arguments. Think. Skills Creativity 5(1), 16–22 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Halpern, D.F.: Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains: Disposition, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring. Am. Psychol. 53(4), 449 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Halpern, D.F.: Manual: The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. Schuhfried, Vienna (2010)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Halpern, D.F.: Is intelligence critical thinking? Why we need a new definition of intelligence. In: Kyllonen, P.C., Roberts, R.D., Stankov, L. (eds.) Extending Intelligence: Enhancement and New Constructs, pp. 293–310. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Facione, P.A., Facione, N.C., Blohm, S.W., Giancarlo, C.A.: The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: CCTST. Form A, Form B, and Form 2000. Test Manual, 2002 Updated Edition. Insight Assessment, Millbrae (2002)Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ennis, R.H.: Is critical thinking culturally biased? Teach. Philos. 21(1), 15–33 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ku, K.Y.L.: Assessing Students’ critical thinking performance: urging for measurements using multi-response format. Think. Skills Creativity 4(1), 70–76 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Valenzuela, J., Nieto, A.M., Saiz, C.: Critical thinking motivational scale: a contribution to the study of relationship between critical thinking and motivation. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 9(2), 823–848 (2011)Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ennis, R.H.: The nature of critical thinking: an outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois, http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf (2011)
  100. 100.
    Facione, P.A., Facione, N., Giancarlo, C.A.F.: The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory: CCTDI Test Manual, California Academic Press (1996)Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Paul, R., Elder, L.: A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards: Standards, Principles, Performance Indicators, and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric, Vol. 8. Foundation Critical Thinking (2005)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Colucciello, M.L.: Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students—a conceptual model for evaluation. J. Prof. Nurs. 13(4), 236–245 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Facione, P.A., Facione, N.C., Giancarlo, C.A.: The Disposition toward critical thinking: its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Inf. Logic 20(1), 61–84 (2000)Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Facione, N.C., Facione, P.A., Sanchez, C.A.: Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. J. Nurs. Educ. 33(8), 345–350 (1994)Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Profeto-McGrath, J.: The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. J. Adv. Nurs. 43(6), 569–577 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rimiene, V.: Assessing and developing students’ critical thinking. Psychol. Learn. Teach. 2(1), 17–22 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S.: Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Huffaker, D.A., Calvert, S.L.: The new science of learning: active learning, metacognition and transfer of knowledge in e-learning applications. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 29(3), 325–334 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    U.S. National Research Council.: Technology and Assessment: Thinking Ahead. Board on Testing and Assessment Center for Education, Washington, DC (2002)Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    King, P.M., Wood, P.K., Mines, R.A.: Critical thinking among college and graduate students. Rev. High. Educ. 13(2), 167–186 (1990)Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Wood, P.K.: Context and Development of Reflective Thinking: A Secondary Analysis of the Structure of Individual Differences. Unpublished manuscript. University of Missouri at Columbia, Missouri (1993)Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Dewey, J.: How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Heath & Co., Lexington (1933)Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S.: Reflective judgment: theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educ. Psychol. 39(1), 5–18 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kitchener, K.S., King, P.M.: Reflective judgment: Concepts of justifications and their relation to age and gender. J. Appl. Develop. Psychol. 2, 89–116 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Brabeck, M.M.: The Relationship between critical thinking skills and development of reflective judgment among adolescent and adult women. In: 89th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles (1981)Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Huffman, K., Vernoy, M., Williams, B., Vernoy, J.: Psychology in Action. Wiley, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Baril, P.B., Cunningham, B.M., Fordham, D.R., Gardner, R.L., Wolcott, S.K.: Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: aptitudes and attitudes. J. Account. Educ. 16(3–4), 381–406 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Perkins, D.N., Ritchhart, R.: When is good thinking? In: Dai, D.Y., Sternberg, R.J. (eds.) Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, pp. 351–384. Erlbaum, Mawah (2004)Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    van Gelder, T.J.: Enhancing Deliberation through computer supported argument mapping. In: Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham-Shum, S., Carr, C. (eds.) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, pp. 97–115. Springer, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    van Gelder, T.J.: How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In: Kennedy, G., Keppell, M., McNaught, C., Petrovic, T. (eds.) Meeting at the Crossroads: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp. 539–548. Biomedical Multimedia Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (2001)Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Facione, P.A.: The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST): Forms A and B. The CCTST Test Manual. California Academic Press, Millbrae (1990)Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I.: An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacogn. Learn. 7(3), 219–244 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Hinsz, V.B., Tindale, R.S., Vollrath, D.A.: The Emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol. Bull. 121(1), 43 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Hinsz, V.B.: Metacognition and mental models in groups: an illustration with metamemory of group recognition memory. In: Salas, E., Fiore, S.M. (eds.) Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, pp. 33–58. American Psychological Association, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Thompson, L., Cohen, T.R.: Metacognition in teams and organizations. In: Briñol, P., DeMarree, K.G. (eds.) Social Metacognition, pp. 283–302. Psychology Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    McIntyre, R.M., Salas, E.: Team performance in complex environments: what we have learned so far. In: Guzzo, R., Salas, E. (eds.) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, pp. 333–380. Josey-Bass, San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Salas, E., Sims, D.E., Burke, C.S.: Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Res. 36(5), 555–599 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Doten, G.W., Cockrell, J.T. Sadacca, R.: The Use of Teams in Image Interpretation: Information Exchange, Confidence, and Resolving Disagreements (Tech. Rep. 1151). U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Washington, DC (1966)Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Siegel, A.I., Federman, P.J.: communications content training as an ingredient in effective team performance. Ergonomics 16(4), 403–416 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Porter, C.O.L.H., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Moon, H.: Backup behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(3), 391–403 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M.: Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collabor. Learn. 5(1), 43–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G.: Does training of self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? J. Educ. Psychol. 96(3), 523–535 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z.R.: Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. Am. Educ. Res. J. 40(1), 281–310 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Lee, H.W., Lim, K.Y., Grabowski, B.L.: Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 58(6), 629–648 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W.: The sociability of CSCL environments. Educ. Technol. Soc. 5(1), 8–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kwon, K., Hong, R.Y., Laffey, J.M.: The educational impact of metacognitive group coordination in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1271–1281 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Ada, W.W.: Computer-supported collaborative learning and higher-order thinking skills: a case study of textile studies. Interdisc. J. E-Learning Learn. Objects 5, 145–167 (2009)Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Peterson, R.S.: A directive leadership style in group decision-making can be both virtue and vice: evidence from elite and experimental groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72(5), 1107 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Harney, O., Hogan, M.J., Broome, B.: Investigating the effects of feedback on argumentation style, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning. In Gómez Chova, L.A., López Martínez, Candel Torres, I. (eds.). INTED2014 Proceedings, pp. 1638–1647. IATED Academy, Valencia (2014)Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Seibold, D.R., Meyers, R.A.: Group argument: a structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Res. 38, 312–336 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Mercer, N.: Sociocultural discourse analysis. J. Appl. Linguistics 1(2), 137–168 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Erkens, G.: Multiple episode protocol analysis (MEPA). Version 4.10. http://edugate.fss.uu.nl/mepa/ (2014)
  144. 144.
    Feeney, P., Harney, O., Hogan, M.J.: The effects of peer feedback on cooperative conversational dynamics in collaborative learning. Unpublished manuscript. (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Hogan
    • 1
  • Christopher P. Dwyer
    • 1
  • Owen M. Harney
    • 1
  • Chris Noone
    • 1
  • Ronan J. Conway
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyNational University of IrelandGalway County, GalwayRepublic of Ireland

Personalised recommendations