Advertisement

Social Responsibility in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions

  • Raquel Reis
  • Paula Rodrigues
  • Moritz von Schwedler
  • Elizabeth Real de Oliveira
Conference paper
  • 65 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

This working paper analyses students’ perceptions on issues related to Social Responsibility in relation to marketing and management students of Portuguese universities. The aim of this paper is to understand how students perceive the Social Responsibility related concepts. It is of interest how they make sense of it when these topics are discussed within the confines of the marketing discipline and how they understand the conceptualisation and operationalisation.

Secondly, a quantitative study has been conducted, including 118 students, aimed at verifying the students’ perceptions on Social Responsibility identified in the first study and its impact in terms of consumer choices. It was confirmed that the students do prefer and choose products from companies that concern themselves more with Social Responsibility.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Business School Bone Marrow Donor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennis, W. G. and O’Toole, J. 2005. “How Business Schools Lost Their Way.” Harvard Business Review 83(5): 96-104.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, E. 2009. “Corporate Social Responsibility in Higher Education.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 8: 474-483.Google Scholar
  3. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. 2002. Management Research - An Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Gardiner, L. and Lacy, P. 2005. “Lead, respond, partner or ignore: the role of business schools on corporate responsibility.” Corporate Governance 5: 174-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghoshal, S. 2005. “Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 4: 75-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Macfarlane, B. and Ottewill, R. 2004. “Business Ethics in the Curriculum: Assessing the Evidence from U.K. Subject Review.” Journal of Business Ethics 54: 339-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matten, D. and Moon, J. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe.” Journal of Business Ethics 54: 323-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McDonald, G. M. 2004. “A Case Example: Integrating Ethics into the Academic Business Curriculum.” Journal of Business Ethics 54: 371-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Owen, D. 2008. “Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21: 240-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roberts, J. A. 1996. “Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?.” Business Horizon 39: 79-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Spence, L. J. 2000. “Teaching business ethics: are there differences between Europe, and is there a European difference?” Business Ethics: A European Review 9: 58-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Windsor, D. 2008. “Educating for Responsible Management.” In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Eds. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. S. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raquel Reis
    • 1
  • Paula Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Moritz von Schwedler
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Real de Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.NathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations