Sensitivity Estimation and Inverse Problems in Spatial Stochastic Models of Chemical Kinetics

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 103)

Abstract

We consider computational stochastic modeling of diffusion-controlled reactions with applications mainly in molecular cell biology. A complication from the traditional ‘well-stirred’ case is that our models have a spatial dimension. Our aim here is to put forward a practical algorithm by which perturbations can be propagated through these types of simulations. This is important since the quality of experimental data calls for frequently estimating stability constants. Another use is in inverse formulations which generally relies on being able to effectively and accurately judge the effects of small perturbations. For this purpose we present our implementation of an “all events method” and give two concrete examples of its use. One case studied is the effect of stochastic focusing in the spatial setting, the other case treats the optimization of a small biochemical network.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Applebaum, Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 93 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Drawert, S. Engblom, A. Hellander, URDME: a modular framework for stochastic simulation of reaction-transport processes in complex geometries. BMC Syst. Biol. 6, 76 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Elf, M. Ehrenberg, Spontaneous separation of bi-stable biochemical systems into spatial domains of opposite phases. Syst. Biol. 1, 2 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Engblom, On the stability of stochastic jump kinetics. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.3892 (2012)
  5. 5.
    S. Engblom, L. Ferm, A. Hellander, P. Lötstedt, Simulation of stochastic reaction–diffusion processes on unstructured meshes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31, 3 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.N. Ethier, T.G. Kurtz, Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.A. Gibson, J. Bruck, Efficient exact stochastic simulation of chemical systems with many species and many channels. J. Phys. Chem. 104(9), (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.T. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 25 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Glasserman, D.D. Yao, Some guidelines and guarantees for common random numbers. Manage. Sci. 38, 6 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.A. Nelder, R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 4 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Paulsson, O.G. Berg, M. Ehrenberg, Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.S.M. Rathinam, M. Khammash, Efficient computation of parameter sensitivities of discrete stochastic chemical reaction networks. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 3 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Scientific Computing, Department of Information TechnologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations