Discovering Object Classes from Activities
Conference paper
Abstract
In order to avoid an expensive manual labelling process or to learn object classes autonomously without human intervention, object discovery techniques have been proposed that extract visually similar objects from weakly labelled videos. However, the problem of discovering small or medium sized objects is largely unexplored. We observe that videos with activities involving human-object interactions can serve as weakly labelled data for such cases. Since neither object appearance nor motion is distinct enough to discover objects in such videos, we propose a framework that samples from a space of algorithms and their parameters to extract sequences of object proposals. Furthermore, we model similarity of objects based on appearance and functionality, which is derived from human and object motion. We show that functionality is an important cue for discovering objects from activities and demonstrate the generality of the model on three challenging RGB-D and RGB datasets.
Keywords
Object Discovery Human-Object Interaction RGBD Videos Download
to read the full conference paper text
References
- 1.Alexe, B., Deselaers, T., Ferrari, V.: What is an object? In: CVPR, pp. 73–80 (2010)Google Scholar
- 2.Blaschko, M.B., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A.: Simultaneous object detection and ranking with weak supervision. In: NIPS, pp. 235–243 (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel. In: ACM Int. Conf. on Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 401–408 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Brox, T., Malik, J.: Object segmentation by long term analysis of point trajectories. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part V. LNCS, vol. 6315, pp. 282–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brox, T., Malik, J.: Large displacement optical flow: descriptor matching in variational motion estimation. PAMI 33(3), 500–513 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chum, O., Zisserman, A.: An exemplar model for learning object classes. In: CVPR, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI 24(5), 603–619 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Delaitre, V., Fouhey, D.F., Laptev, I., Sivic, J., Gupta, A., Efros, A.A.: Scene semantics from long-term observation of people. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 7577, pp. 284–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Deselaers, T., Alexe, B., Ferrari, V.: Localizing objects while learning their appearance. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6314, pp. 452–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Everingham, M., Gool, L.V., Williams, C., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV 88, 303–338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fathi, A., Ren, X., Rehg, J.: Learning to recognize objects in egocentric activities. In: CVPR, pp. 3281–3288 (2011)Google Scholar
- 12.Felzenszwalb, P.F., Huttenlocher, D.P.: Efficient graph-based image segmentation. IJCV 59(2), 167–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Filipovych, R., Ribeiro, E.: Recognizing primitive interactions by exploring actor-object states. In: CVPR (2008)Google Scholar
- 14.Human Body Analysis. In: Fossati, A., Gall, J., Grabner, H., Ren, X., Konolige, K. (eds.) Consumer Depth Cameras for Computer Vision. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
- 15.Fouhey, D.F., Delaitre, V., Gupta, A., Efros, A.A., Laptev, I., Sivic, J.: People watching: Human actions as a cue for single view geometry. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part V. LNCS, vol. 7576, pp. 732–745. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Gall, J., Fossati, A., van Gool, L.: Functional categorization of objects using real-time markerless motion capture. In: CVPR, pp. 1969–1976 (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.Gall, J., Yao, A., Razavi, N., Van Gool, L., Lempitsky, V.: Hough forests for object detection, tracking, and action recognition. PAMI 33(11), 2188–2202 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Grabner, H., Gall, J., Van Gool, L.: What makes a chair a chair? In: CVPR, pp. 1529–1536 (2011)Google Scholar
- 19.Gupta, A., Davis, L.: Objects in action: An approach for combining action understanding and object perception. In: CVPR, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
- 20.Gupta, A., Satkin, S., Efros, A.A., Hebert, M.: From 3D scene geometry to human workspace. In: CVPR, pp. 1961–1968 (2011)Google Scholar
- 21.Jiang, Y., Koppula, H., Saxena, A.: Hallucinated humans as the hidden context for labeling 3D scenes. In: CVPR, pp. 2993–3000 (2013)Google Scholar
- 22.Jones, M., Rehg, J.: Statistical color models with application to skin detection. IJCV 46(1), 81–96 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kjellström, H., Romero, J., Kragic, D.: Visual object-action recognition: Inferring object affordances from human demonstration. CVIU 115, 81–90 (2010)Google Scholar
- 24.Kolmogorov, V.: Convergent tree-reweighted message passing for energy minimization. PAMI 28(10), 1568–1583 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Koppula, H., Gupta, R., Saxena, A.: Learning human activities and object affordances from rgb-d videos. IJRR 32(8), 951–970 (2013)Google Scholar
- 26.Lee, Y.J., Grauman, K.: Learning the easy things first: Self-paced visual category discovery. In: CVPR, pp. 1721–1728 (2011)Google Scholar
- 27.Leistner, C., Godec, M., Schulter, S., Saffari, A., Werlberger, M., Bischof, H.: Improving classifiers with unlabeled weakly-related videos. In: CVPR, pp. 2753–2760 (2011)Google Scholar
- 28.Manen, S., Guillaumin, M., Van Gool, L.: Prime object proposals with randomized prim’s algorithm. In: ICCV, pp. 2536–2543 (2013)Google Scholar
- 29.Moore, D., Essa, I., Hayes, M.: Exploiting human actions and object context for recognition tasks. In: ICCV, pp. 80–86 (1999)Google Scholar
- 30.Ommer, B., Mader, T., Buhmann, J.: Seeing the Objects Behind the Dots: Recognition in Videos from a Moving Camera. IJCV 83, 57–71 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Peursum, P., West, G., Venkatesh, S.: Combining image regions and human activity for indirect object recognition in indoor wide-angle views. In: ICCV, pp. 82–89 (2005)Google Scholar
- 32.Pieropan, A., Ek, C.H., Kjellstrom, H.: Functional object descriptors for human activity modeling. In: ICRA, pp. 1282–1289 (2013)Google Scholar
- 33.Prest, A., Leistner, C., Civera, J., Schmid, C., Ferrari, V.: Learning object class detectors from weakly annotated video. In: CVPR, pp. 3282–3289 (2012)Google Scholar
- 34.Ramanan, D., Forsyth, D.A., Barnard, K.: Building models of animals from video. PAMI 28(8), 1319–1334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Rohrbach, M., Amin, S., Andriluka, M., Schiele, B.: A database for fine grained activity detection of cooking activities. In: CVPR, pp. 1194–1201 (2012)Google Scholar
- 36.Rubinstein, M., Joulin, A., Kopf, J., Liu, C.: Unsupervised joint object discovery and segmentation in internet images. In: CVPR, pp. 1939–1946 (2013)Google Scholar
- 37.Schulter, S., Leistner, C., Roth, P.M., Bischof, H.: Unsupervised object discovery and segmentation in videos. In: BMVC, pp. 391–404 (2013)Google Scholar
- 38.Turek, M.W., Hoogs, A., Collins, R.: Unsupervised learning of functional categories in video scenes. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6312, pp. 664–677. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Tuytelaars, T., Lampert, C.H., Blaschko, M.B., Buntine, W.: Unsupervised object discovery: A comparison. IJCV 88, 284–302 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Winn, J.M., Jojic, N.: Locus: Learning object classes with unsupervised segmentation. In: ICCV, pp. 756–763 (2005)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014