Integrated Modelling of Climate Change and Urban Drainage

  • Ashish Shrestha
  • Mukand Singh Babel
  • Sutat Weesakul
Chapter
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Patterns of climate variables are changing under climate change resulting in increased frequency and intensity of extreme events. The implications are thus observed in existing natural and man-made systems. Man-made systems, mainly storm water management systems, are prone to it’s functional failure due to recurrent events of extreme rainfall. Most urban drainage systems designed under stationary climate consideration are operating over capacity well ahead of their design period. There are several approaches and tools available to model climate change and urban drainage. This chapter discusses the integrated approach of climate change and urban drainage modelling to assess the direct implications of climate change on hydraulic performance of urban drainage.

Keywords

Climate change Mike urban Urban drainage IDFs LARS-WG 

References

  1. Berggren K, Olofsson M, Viklander M, Svensson G (2007) Tools for measuring climate change impacts on urban drainage systems. NOVATECH, pp 239–246Google Scholar
  2. Boo KO, Kwon WT, Baek HJ (2006) Change of extreme events of temperature and precipitation over Korea using regional projection of future climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33:L01701Google Scholar
  3. Boonya-Aroonnet S, Weesakul S, Mark O (2001) Modelling of urban flooding in Bangkok. Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler D, Schutze M (2005) Integrating simulation models with a view to optimal control of urban wastewater systems. Environ Model Softw 20(4):415–426. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen AS, Evans B, Djordjević S, Savić DA (2012a) A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling. J Hydrol 426–427:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.007 Google Scholar
  6. Chen AS, Evans B, Djordjević S, Savić DA (2012b) Multi-layered coarse grid modelling in 2D urban flood simulations. J Hydrol doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.022
  7. Chingnawan S (2003) Real time modelling of urban drainage in the Sukhumvit area, Bangkok, Thailand. Master Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  8. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, MaidenherdGoogle Scholar
  9. Emori S, Brown SJ (2005) Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme precipitation under changed climate. Geophys Res Lett 32:L17706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC Working Group III (2000) IPCC special report emissions scenarios. intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)Google Scholar
  11. IPCC (2007) ipcc fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 (AR4)—working group 1 report, the physical science basis. Geneva: IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm#.UvBRgf3d2N8
  12. Irwin SE, Sarwar R, King LM, Simonovic SP (2012) Assessment of climatic vulnerability in the Upper Thames River Basin: downscaling with LARS WG. Water resources research report: The University of Western Ontario, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  13. James W, Robert C, Huang J (2002) PCSWMM: Integration of the stormwater management model with GIS, the web and a group decision support system. Presented at fifth International Eco-city conference: Shenzhen, China. August 19–23Google Scholar
  14. Koutsoyiannis D (2003) Rainfall disaggregation methods: theory and applications. In: Workshop on statistical and mathematical methods for hydrological analysis. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. Koutsoyiannis D, Onof C (2001) Rainfall disaggregation using adjusting procedures on a Poisson cluster model. J Hydrol 246(1–4):109–122. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00363-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koutsoyiannis D, Kozonis D, Manetas A (1998) A mathematical framework for studying rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationships. J Hydrol 206:118–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mailhot A, Duchesne S (2010) Design criteria of urban drainage infrastructures under climate change. J Water Resour Plann Manage Am Soc Civil Eng, pp 201–208Google Scholar
  18. Mark O, Weesakul S, Apirumanekul C, Aroonnet SB, Djordjević S (2004) Potential and limitations of 1D modelling of urban flooding. J Hydrol 299(3–4):284–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mehdi B, Mrena C, Douglas A (2006) Adapting to climate change: an introduction for Canadian Municipalities. Canadian climate impacts and adaptation research network (CCIARN). Natural Resources: Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  20. Néelz S, Pender G (2010) Benchmarking of 2D hydraulic modelling packages. Heriot Watt University, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen VT (2005) Downscaling methods for evaluating the impacts of climate change and variability on hydrological regime at basin scale. Role of Water Sciences in Transboundary River Basin ManagementGoogle Scholar
  22. Nguyen HQ (2009) Rainfall forecasting and a real time hydrologic information system for Bangkok, Thailand. Doctoral dissertation: Asian Institute of Technology, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  23. Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Brinkop S, Dümenil L, Esch M, Kirk E, Lunkeit F, Ponater M, Rockel B, Sausen R, Schlese U, Schubert S, Windelband M (1992) Simulation of the present day climate with the echam model: impact of model physics and resolution, mpi report (1987–2004) 93. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Christoph M, Claussen M, Dümenil L, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (1996) The atmospheric general circulation model echam-4: model description and simulation of present day climate, MPI Report (1987–2004) 218. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  25. Russo B, Pouget L, Sunyer D, Malgrat P, Theias H (2011) Flood risk assessment through a 2D-1D coupled modeling approach including impact of climate change in Barcelona. In the Proceedings of 12th international conference on urban drainage. Porto Alegre/Brazil SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  26. Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P (2010) The use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for impact assessments of climate change. Climate Research 41:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seyoum SD, Vojinovic Z, Price RK, Weesakul S (2012) Coupled 1D and non inertia 2d flood inundation model for simulation of urban flooding. J Hydraul Eng Am Soc Civil Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900
  28. Shrestha A (2013) Impact of climate change on urban flooding in Sukhumvit area of Bangkok. Master Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  29. Shrestha A, Chaosakul T, Priyankara DPMP, Chuyen LH, Myat SS, Syne NK, Irvine KN, Koottatep T, Babel MS (2014) Application of PCSWMM to Explore possible climate change impacts on surface flooding in a Peri-urban area of Pathum Thani, Thailand. Journal of Water Management Modeling, ISSN 2292-6062: CHI 2014. doi:10.14796/JWMM.C377Google Scholar
  30. Solaiman TA, Simonovic SP (2011) Development of probability based intensity duration-frequency curves under climate change. Water Resources Research Report: The University of Western Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  31. Sunyer MA, Madsen H, Ang PH (2012) A comparison of different regional climate models and statistical downscaling methods for extreme rainfall estimation under climate change. Atmos Res 103:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trenberth KE (1999) Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle with climate change. Clim Change 42:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vojinovic Z, Tutulic D (2009) On the use of 1D and coupled 1D-2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas. Urban Water J 6(3):183–199. doi: 10.1080/15730620802566877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vojinovic Z, Seyoum S, Salum MH, Price RK, Fikri AK, Abebe Y (2012) Modelling floods in urban areas and representation of buildings with a method based on adjusted conveyance and storage characteristics. J Hydroinformatics 1:19. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2012.181 Google Scholar
  35. Wilby R, Dawson C, Barrow E (2004) SDSM—a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17(2):145–157. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00060-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashish Shrestha
    • 1
  • Mukand Singh Babel
    • 1
  • Sutat Weesakul
    • 1
  1. 1.Asian Institute of TechnologyKlong LuangThailand

Personalised recommendations