Advertisement

Husserl and Geiger on Feelings and Intentionality

  • Michele AverchiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 216)

Abstract

How are we conscious of our feelings? The question was a controversial topic among German psychologists between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. In 1911 Moritz Geiger made his contribution to the debate with a paper titled “Das Bewusstsein von Gefühle”. Husserl read Geiger’s text and sketched an alternative answer to the question about the manifestation of feelings. Geiger’s and Husserl’s texts dealt with the problem of intentionality and object orientation of feelings: are feeling object oriented? Geiger’s answered that, in feelings, consciousness is sometimes not oriented to representations (and, therefore, that object-intentionality is not an essential property of the mind), while Husserl incorporated object-intentionality in the broader structure of time-consciousness.

In my paper I will: (a) sketch in more detail the historical background of the discussion (b) present Geiger’s and Husserl’s accounts (c) compare the two and draw some conclusions.

Keywords

State Orientation Logical Investigation Retentional Queue Object Orientation Emotional Feeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Averchi, M. 2012. Per un inquadramento della nozione di Ichspaltung nella filosofia di Moritz Geiger. In Il piacere dell’opera, ed. A. Pinotti, 42–53. Milano: UNICOPLI.Google Scholar
  2. Brentano, F. 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  3. Conte, P. 2012. Così vicino, così lontano. Moritz Geiger e il concetto fenomenologico di “distanza”. In Il piacere dell’opera, ed. A. Pinotti, 54–62. Milano: UNICOPLI.Google Scholar
  4. Geiger, M. 1904. Bemerkungen zur Psychologie der Gefühlselemente und Gefühlsverbindungen. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 233–288.Google Scholar
  5. Geiger, M. 1911. Das Bewusstein der Gefühle. In Münchener Philosophische Abhandlungen, 125–162. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  6. Geiger, M. 1913. Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung 1: 567–684.Google Scholar
  7. Geiger, M., and H. Spiegelberg. 1943. An introduction to existential philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3(3): 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gödde, G. 2012. Berührungspunkte zwischen der “Philosophie” Freuds und der Phänomenologie. In Founding psychoanalysis phenomenologically. Phenomenological theory of subjectivity and the psychoanalytic experience, ed. D. Lohmar and J. Brudzińska, 105–132. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. 1969. Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917), Husserliana, vol. X, ed. Rudolf Boehm. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, E. 2001. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Husserliana, vol. XIX, ed. Ursula Panzer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1984. English trans. by J.N. Findlay: Logical Investigations. London/New York.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, E. 2004. Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893–1912), Husserliana, vol. XXXVIII, ed. Thomas Vongehr and Regula Giuliani. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Jaspers, K. 1913. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Ein Leitfaden für Studierende, Ärzte und Psychologen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Lipps, T. 1901. Das Selbstbewusstsein: Empfindung und Gefühl. Wiesbaden: Verlag von J.F. Bergmann.Google Scholar
  14. Lipps, T. 1902. Vom Fühlen, Wollen und Denken. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
  15. Lipps, T. 1907. Bewusstsein und Gegenstände. In Psychologische Untersuchungen, ed. T. Lipps, 1–204. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  16. Mach, E. (ed.). 1886. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Berlin: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  17. Métraux, A. 1975. Edmund Husserl und Moritz Geiger. In Die Münchener Phänomenologie, ed. H. Kuhn, E. Avé-Lallement, and R. Gladiator, 139–157. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. Strasser, S. 1977. Phenomenology of feeling. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stumpf, C.: Über Gefühlsempfindungen. In Bericht über den II. Kongreß für experimentelle Psychologie in Würzburg vom 18–21 April 1906, ed. F. Schumann, 209–213. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
  20. Vendrell Ferran, I. 2008. Die Emotionen. Gefühle in der realistischen Phänomenologie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Wundt, W. 1874. Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  22. Zelter, H. 1960. Moritz Geiger zum Gedächtnis. Zeitschrift für Philosophie 14: 452–466.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Catholic University of AmericaWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations