The Problem of Mental Disorder

  • Petr Kouba
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 75)

Abstract

This chapter returns to Zollikoner Seminare and to its sketch of the notion of illness. Considering the fact that every illness deprives human existence of some possibilities, Heidegger explains every pathological state as a phenomenon of privation. This applies not only to mental disorders, but also to somatic disorders. As to the notion of privation, Heidegger explains it with a reference to Plato’s concept of relative non-being (τò μη ’òν), which appears in the dialogue Sophist, but it seems that his usage of the term “privation” owes much more to Aristotle’s notion of στέρησις. It is perhaps no accident that in his Metaphysics Aristotle explains the meaning of στέρησις on the example of illness (blindness). In any case, Heidegger concretizes his view of the psychopathological phenomena suggesting that they bear all signs of the entanglement in the world, and thus of the inauthentic existence. Saying this, he actually makes an analogy between mental illness and the inauthentic existence on the one side, and the mental health and the authentic existence on the other. The authentic existence is, thus, placed in the position of the normative ideal of health, while the inauthentic existence serves as a model explaining all psychopathological phenomena. Nevertheless, it is questionable whether the same applies to the somatic sphere of existence, as well.

Keywords

Mental illness Mental health Authenticity Inauthenticity Privation Normativity 

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle. 1984. Metaphysics, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boss, Medard. 1975. Grundriss der Medizin und der Psychologie. Bern/Stuttgart/Wien: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foucault, Michel. 1963. Naissance de la Clinique. Paris: PUF. English edition: Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. Trans. A.M. Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foucault, Michel. 1966. Maladie mentale et psychologie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heidegger, Martin. 1983. Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. English edition: Heidegger, Martin. 1995. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. World, Finitude, Solitude. Trans. William McNeill and Nicholas Walker). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heidegger, Martin. 1987. Zollikoner Seminare. Protokolle, Gespräche, Briefe. ed. Medard Boss. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. English edition: Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Zollikon Seminars. Trans. Franz Mayr and Richard Askay. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heidegger, Martin. 1993. Sein und Zeit, 17th ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer. English edition: Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holzhey-Kunz, Alice. 1988. Die zweideutigkeit seelischen Leidens. Daseinsanalyse 5: 81–95.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holzhey-Kunz, Alice. 1992. Psychotherapie und Philosophie. Daseinsanalyse 9: 153–162.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzhey-Kunz, Alice. 1994. Leiden am Dasein: die Daseinsanalyse und die Aufgabe einer Hermeneutik psychopathologischer Phänomene. Wien: Passagen-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Němec, Jan, Jan Patočka, and Petr Rezek. 1976. Vybrané filosofické problémy psychopatologie a normality. Prague: Archiv Jana Patočky.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vetter, Helmuth. 1993. Es gibt keine unmittelbare Gesundheit des Geistes. Daseinsanalyse 10: 65–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Kouba
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophical Institute of the Czech Academy of SciencesCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations