Two Make a Network: Using Graphs to Assess the Quality of Collaboration of Dyads

  • Irene-Angelica Chounta
  • Tobias Hecking
  • Heinz Ulrich Hoppe
  • Nikolaos Avouris
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8658)

Abstract

In this paper we explore the application of network analysis techniques in order to analyze synchronous collaborative activities of dyads. The collaborative activities are represented and visualized as networks. We argue that the characteristics and properties of the networks reflect the quality of collaboration and therefore can support the analysis of collaborative activities in an automated way. To support this argument we studied the collaborative practice of 228 dyads based on graphs. The properties of each graph were evaluated in comparison to ratings of collaboration quality as assessed by human experts. The activities were also examined with respect to the solution quality. The paper presents the method and the findings of the study.

Keywords

learning analytics collaboration analysis network graph theory SNA CSCL 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schümmer, T., Strijbos, J.W., Berkel, T.: A new direction for log file analysis in CSCL: Experiences with a spatio-temporal metric. In: 2005 Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005). International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 567–576 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martínez-Monés, A., Harrer, A., Dimitriadis, Y.: An interaction-aware design process for the integration of interaction analysis into mainstream CSCL practices. In: Analyzing Interactions in CSCL, pp. 269–291. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratitsis, T., Dimitracopoulou, A., Martínez-Monés, A., Marcos, J.A., Dimitriadis, Y.: Supporting members of a learning community using Interaction Analysis tools: The example of the Kaleidoscope NoE scientific network. In: Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, pp. 809–813. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kahrimanis, G., Chounta, I.A., Avouris, N.: Study of correlations between logfile-based metrics of interaction and the quality of synchronous collaboration. In: 9th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Workshop on Analysing the Quality of Collaboration, International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI), p. 24. Aix en Provence (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stahl, G.: Rediscovering CSCL. In: CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, pp. 169–181. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D.: Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In: Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reffay, C., Teplovs, C., Blondel, F.-M.: Productive re-use of CSCL data and analytic tools to provide a new perspective on group cohesion. In: Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice, pp. 846–850 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toikkanen, T., Lipponen, L.: The applicability of social network analysis to the study of networked learning. Interactive Learning Environments 19, 365–379 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K.: Patterns of interaction in computersupported learning: A social network analysis. In: Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 334–339 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., Seel, N.M.: The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science 39, 41–61 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wasserman, S.: Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suthers, D.D.: Interaction, mediation, and ties: An analytic hierarchy for socio-technical systems. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nasirifard, P., Peristeras, V., Hayes, C., Decker, S.: Extracting and utilizing social networks from log files of shared workspaces. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Paraskakis, I., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 307, pp. 643–650. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hecking, T., Ziebarth, S., Hoppe, H.U.: Analysis of dynamic resource access patterns in a blended learning course. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, pp. 173–182. ACM, Indianapolis (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halatchliyski, I., Hecking, T., Göhnert, T., Hoppe, H.U.: Analyzing the flow of ideas and profiles of contributors in an open learning community. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 66–74. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl 5, 17–61 (1960)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Sivakumar, D., Tomkins, A., Upfal, E.: Stochastic models for the web graph. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 57–65. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Avouris, N., Margaritis, M., Komis, V.: Modelling Interaction during small-group Synchronous problem solving activities: the Synergo approach. In: 2nd International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004, Maceio, Brasil, pp. 13–18 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahrimanis, G., Meier, A., Chounta, I.-A., Voyiatzaki, E., Spada, H., Rummel, N., Avouris, N.: Assessing collaboration quality in synchronous CSCL problem-solving activities: Adaptation and empirical evaluation of a rating scheme. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 267–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chounta, I.-A., Avouris, N.: Time Series Analysis of Collaborative Activities. In: Herskovic, V., Hoppe, H.U., Jansen, M., Ziegler, J. (eds.) CRIWG 2012. LNCS, vol. 7493, pp. 145–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suthers, D.D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., Vatrapu, R.: A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5, 5–42 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Avouris, N.M., Dimitracopoulou, A., Komis, V., Fidas, C.: OCAF: an object-oriented model of analysis of collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 92–101 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Göhnert, T., Harrer, A., Hecking, T., Hoppe, H.U.: A workbench to construct and re-use network analysis workflows: concept, implementation, and example case. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 1464–1466. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barabasi, A.-L.: The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435, 207–211 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoppe, H.U., Engler, J., Weinbrenner, S.: The Impact of Structural Characteristics of Concept Maps on Automatic Quality Measurement. In: International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Sydney, Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reihaneh, R., Takaffoli, M., Zaïane, O.R.: Analyzing participation of students in online courses using social network analysis techniques. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene-Angelica Chounta
    • 1
  • Tobias Hecking
    • 2
  • Heinz Ulrich Hoppe
    • 2
  • Nikolaos Avouris
    • 1
  1. 1.HCI GroupUniversity of PatrasGreece
  2. 2.CollideUniversity of Duisburg-EssenGermany

Personalised recommendations