Advertisement

Centrifuge Modelling of the Dynamic Behavior of Square Tunnels in Sand

  • Grigorios TsinidisEmail author
  • Charles Heron
  • Kyriazis Pitilakis
  • Gopal S. P. Madabhushi
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 35)

Abstract

The Chapter summarizes representative experimental results from dynamic centrifuge tests that were performed on square model-tunnels embedded in dry sand. Two model-tunnels were used, a rigid and a flexible one, with the latter model collapsing during the test. The tests were carried out at the geotechnical centrifuge facility of the University of Cambridge, within the Transnational Access action of the SERIES Research Project (TA Project: TUNNELSEIS). The experimental data is presented in terms of acceleration in the soil and on the tunnel, earth pressures on the side walls of the tunnel and internal forces of the tunnel lining. The collapse mechanism of the flexible tunnel is presented and discussed based on the recorded response. The goal of this program is two fold: to better understand the seismic behaviour of this type of structures, and to use the high quality data to validate the numerical models, which should be used for the design of rectangular embedded structures. The interpretation of the results reveals (i) “rocking” response of the tunnels in addition to racking, (ii) existence of residual values on the earth pressures on the side walls and on the internal forces after shaking, affected significantly by the flexibility of the tunnels, and (iii) modification of the induced shear wave field from the presence of the shallow tunnel, which in turn is affecting its seismic response. These issues are not well understood and often are not considered by simplified seismic analysis methods.

Keywords

Seismic Response Earth Pressure Input Motion Tunnel Lining Shallow Tunnel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] for access to the Turner Beam Centrifuge, Cambridge, UK under grant agreement n° 227887. The technical support received by the Technicians of the Schofield Centre is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Cilingir U, Madabhushi SPG (2011) A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behavior of tunnels. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:452–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. FHWA (2009) Technical manual for design and construction of road tunnels—Civil elements. U.S. Department of transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-09-010 p 629Google Scholar
  3. Ghosh B, Madabhushi SPG (2002) An efficient tool for measuring shear wave velocity in the centrifuge. In: Phillips R, Guo PJ, Popescu R (eds) Proceedings of international conference on physical modelling in Geotechnics, St Johns, NF, Canada. AA Balkema publishers, the Netherlands, 119–124Google Scholar
  4. Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div 98(SM7):667–692Google Scholar
  5. Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JIC (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 16(2): 247–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iida H, Hiroto T, Yoshida N, Iwafuji M (1996) Damage to Daikai subway station. Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake. Japanese Geotechnical Society, 283–300Google Scholar
  7. ISO 23469 (2005) Bases for design of structures—Seismic actions for designing geotechnical works. ISO International Standard. ISO TC 98/SC3/WG10Google Scholar
  8. Lanzano G, Bilotta E, Russo G, Silvestri F, Madabhushi SPG (2012) Centrifuge modeling of seismic loading on tunnels in sand. Geotech Test J 35:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Madabhushi SPG, Schofield AN, Lesley S (1998) A new stored angular momentum (SAM) based earthquake actuator. In: Kimura T, Kusakabe O, Takemura J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference Centrifuge ’98, Tokyo, Japan. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 111–116Google Scholar
  10. Madabhushi SPG, Houghton NE, Haigh SK (2006) A new automatic sand pourer for model preparation at University of Cambridge. Proceedings of 6th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitrani H (2006) Liquefaction Remediation Techniques for Existing Buildings. PhD Thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Penzien J (2000) Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G (2014) Performance and Seismic Design of Underground Structures. In: Maugeri M and Soccodato C (eds) Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Design. Geotechnical Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 28, pp. 279–340, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03182-8_11Google Scholar
  14. Power M, Rosidi D, Kaneshiro J, Gilstrap S, Chiou SJ (1998) Summary and evaluation of procedures for the seismic design of tunnels. Final Report for Task 112-d-5.3(c). National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations. Geotechnique 30(3):227–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schofield AN, Zeng X (1992) Design and performance of an equivalent shear beam (ESB) container for earthquake centrifuge modelling. Technical Report, CUED/D-Soils/I’R245, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Sharma S, Judd WR (1991) Underground opening damage from earthquakes. Eng Geol 30:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tsinidis G, Heron C, Pitilakis K and Madabhushi SPG (2014) Physical modeling for the evaluation of the seismic behavior of square tunnels. In: Ilki A and Fardis M (eds) Seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of structures. Geotechnical Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 26, pp.389–406, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00458-7_22Google Scholar
  19. Wang JN (1993) Seismic design of tunnels—A simple state-of-the-art design approach. Parsons Brinckerhoff, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grigorios Tsinidis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charles Heron
    • 2
  • Kyriazis Pitilakis
    • 1
  • Gopal S. P. Madabhushi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Soil Dynamics and Geotechnical Earthquake EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Engineering, Schofield CentreUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations