Non-R&D-Intensive Firms’ Innovation Sourcing

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

In times of increasing technological complexity and innovation dynamics, firms are no longer willing or able to have all the necessary knowledge and competences available within their enterprises. It is becoming increasingly more important for firms to explore and exploit external sources of knowledge and innovation impulses if they follow an open innovation approach. Based on novel empirical firm-level data, this chapter examines the types of external sources of knowledge and innovation impulses on which firms with different levels of R&D intensity rely and the types of external partners with which they interact in innovation collaborations. The findings show that both non-R&D-performing and non-R&D-intensive firms succeed in tapping into external sources of innovation knowledge but that they are more oriented towards practical and implicit stocks of knowledge coming from partners along their value chains or markets compared with R&D-intensive firms. As a result, both types of firms have large unused potential with regard to their collaboration activities, especially those with external R&D organisations.

Keywords

Firm Size Innovation Performance External Partner Collaboration Activity Innovation Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amit, R., & Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Arundel, A., Bordoy, C., & Kanerva, M. (2008). Neglected innovators: How do innovative firms that do not perform R&D innovate? Results of an analysis of the Innobarometer 2007 survey No. 215, INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Barge-Gil, A., Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2008). Hidden innovators: The role of non-R&D activities. Paper presented at the 25th Celebration Conference 2008 on Entrepreneurship and Innovation—Organisations, Institutions, Systems and Regions. Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark, June 17–20, 2008, available at: http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=3352&cf=29 (last accessed on 4th of May 2014).
  5. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the national basketball association. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organisational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organisation Science, 2, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czarnitzki, D., & Wastyn, A. (2009). Does professional knowledge management improve innovation performance at the firm level? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 09-067, Centre for European Economic Research. ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp09067.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2010.
  12. David, P., & Foray, D. (1995). Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI Review, 16, 16–38.Google Scholar
  13. David, P. (1996). Science reorganized? Postmodern visions of research and the curse of success. MERIT Research Memoranda, No. 2-96-002, http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/rmpdf/1996/rm1996-002.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2010.
  14. Decarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organisational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demsetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation, 4(1), 141–161.Google Scholar
  16. Demsetz, H. (1991). The theory of the firm revisited. In O. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm—Origin, evolution and development (pp. 159–178). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Duschek, S. (1998). Kooperative Kernkompetenzen—Zum Management einzigartiger Netzwerkresourcen. Zeitschrift Führung und Organisation, 68(4), 230–236.Google Scholar
  18. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
  19. Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge-transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  21. Edquist, C., & Texier, F. (1998). Innovations, systems and european integration (ISE). Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. (2002). Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy? In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy & management (pp. 139–164). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Evangelista, R., Sandven, T., Sirilli, G., & Smith, K. (1998). Measuring innovation in European industry. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3), 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evangelista, R. (1999). Knowledge and investment: The sources of innovation in industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Foray, D. (1998). The economics of knowledge openness: Emergence, persistence and change of conventions in the knowledge systems. In N. Lazaric & E. Lorenz (Eds.), Trust in economic learning (pp. 162–189). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Foray, D. (2006). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Foss, N. J. (1996). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organisation Science, 7(5), 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman, C. (1994). Innovation and growth. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation (pp. 78–93). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galiläer, L., & Wende, R. (2008a). Produktionsarbeit im Wandel. Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung einfacher Fachtätigkeiten in der Metall und Elektroindustrie. In H. Loebe & E. Severing (Eds.), Qualifikationstrends—Erkennen, Aufbereiten, Transferieren. Ergebnisse und Transferwege der Früherkennungsforschung am Beispiel einfacher Fachtätigkeiten (pp. 23–54). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  32. Galiläer, L., & Wende, R. (2008b). Früherkennung im Betrieb—Instrumente und Methoden zur Erhebung des aktuellen und zukünftigen Qualifikationsbedarfs. In H. Loebe & E. Severing (Eds.), Qualifikationstrends—Erkennen, Aufbereiten, Transferieren. Ergebnisse und Transferwege der Früherkennungsforschung am Beispiel einfacher Fachtätigkeiten (pp. 81–107). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  33. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant, R. M. (1996a). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 109–122.Google Scholar
  35. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organisational capability as knowledge integration. Organisation Science, 7, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grant, R. M. (2002). The knowledge-based view of the firm. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organisational knowledge: A collection of readings (pp. 133–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haas, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organisational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.Google Scholar
  40. Heidenreich, M. (2009). Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38, 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quartely, 35(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2004). “Low-Technology” – Ein innovationspolitisch vergessener Sektor. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen & J. Weyer (Eds.), Soziologisches Arbeitspapier Nr. 2/2004. Dortmund: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  43. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2007). “Lowtech”. Innovationsmuster und Entwicklungschancen. In J. Abel & H. Hirsch-Kreinsen (Eds.), Lowtech-Unternehmen am Hightech-Standort (pp. 253–280). Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
  44. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008a). “Low-tech” innovations. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008b). Innovationspolitik: Die Hightech-Obsession. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen & J. Weyer (Eds.), Soziologisches Arbeitspapier Nr. 22/2008. Dortmund: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  46. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organisational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organisation Science, 2, 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jäger, A., & Maloca, S. (2013). Dokumentation der Umfrage Modernisierung der Produktion 2012. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.Google Scholar
  48. Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., & Jaeger, A. (2009a). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms—An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy, 38, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirner, E., Som, O., & Jaeger, A. (2009b). Vernetzungsmuster und Innovationsverhalten von nicht forschungsintensiven Betrieben. Empirische Ergebnisse aus der deutschen Industrie. Stuttgart, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Kirner, E., Som, O., & Jäger, A. (2010). Vernetzungsmuster und Innovationsverhalten von nicht forschungsintensiven Betrieben: Empirische Ergebnisse aus der deutschen Industrie. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy. Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–305). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organisation Science, 3, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Koschatzky, K., Bross, U., & Stanovnik, P. (2001). Development and innovation potential in the slovene manufacturing industry: Analysis of an industrial innovation survey. Technovation, 21, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organisational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Li, L., Quian, G., & Quian, Z. (2013). Do partners in international strategic alliances share resources, costs, and risks? Journal of Business Research, 66(2013), 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organisational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lundvall, B. Â. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial Development. Research Series 31. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, R. R. (2000). National innovation systems. In Z. J. Acs (Ed.), Regional innovation, knowledge and global change (pp. 11–26). London, New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.Google Scholar
  66. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation. Organisation Science, 5, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy, 28(8), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nooteboom, B. (2009). A cognitive theory of the firm. Learning, governance and dynamic capabilities. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. OECD. (1992). OSLO manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (1st ed.). Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  70. OECD. (1997). OSLO manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  71. OECD. (2005). OSLO manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  72. Pautzke, G. (1989). Die Evolution der organisatorischen Wissensbasis. Herrsching: Barbara Kirsch.Google Scholar
  73. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Day.Google Scholar
  75. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  76. Rammer, C., Köhler, C., Murmann, M., Pesau, A., Schwiebacher, F., Kinkel, et al. (2011). Innovation ohne Forschung und Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung zu Unternehmen, die ohne eigene FuE-Taätigkeit neue Produkte und Prozesse einführen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, Nr. 15-2011. Mannheim, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  77. Raymond, L., & St-Pierre, J. (2010). R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation, 30, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In B. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management (pp. 556–570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  79. Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium technology industries. Research Policy, 38, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37, 1492–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schuh, G., Firedli, T., & Kurr, M. A. (2005). Kooperationsmanagement. Systematische Vorbereitung, gezielter Auf- und Ausbau, entscheidende Erfolgsfaktoren. München: Hanser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simonin, B. L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organisation. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1150–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, K. (2005). Measuring innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 148–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Som, O., Kinkel, S., Kirner, E., Buschak, D., Frietsch, R., Jäger, A., et al. (2010). Zukunftspotenziale und Strategien nichtforschungsintensiver Industriebereiche in Deutschland—Auswirkungen auf Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Beschäftigung. Innovationsreport Nr. 140 des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag. Berlin.Google Scholar
  85. Som, O., & Zanker, C. (2011). Gestaltung und Management von Innovationskooperationen. Lösungsansätze und Instrumente zur Steigerung der Innovationsfähigkeit nichtforschungsintensiver Unternehmen. Ifaa-Taschenbuchreihe, Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft, Heidelberg: Dr. Curt Haefner-Verlag.Google Scholar
  86. Som, O. (2012). Innovation without R&D. Heterogeneous innovation patterns of Non-R&D-performing firms in the German manufacturing industry. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  87. Som, O., Diekmann, J., Solberg, E., Schricke, E., Schubert, T., Jung-Erceg, P., et al. (2012). Organisational and marketing innovation—promises and pitfalls? PRO INNO Europe: INNO-Grips II report. Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.Google Scholar
  88. Som, O., & Diekmann, J. (2014). Same same but different – specific barriers to non-technical innovation. Paper to be presented at XXV ISPIM Innovation Conference in Dublin, Ireland on 8–11 June 2014.Google Scholar
  89. Spender, J. C. (1996a). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), 45–62.Google Scholar
  90. Spender, J. C. (1996b). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and his strategic implications. In B. Moingeon & A. Edmondson (Eds.), Organisational learning and competitive advantage (pp. 56–73). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 5–9.Google Scholar
  92. Sundbo, J. (1996). The balancing of empowerment. A Strategic Resource Based Model of Organizing Innovation Activities in Service and Low-Tech Firms. Technovation, 16(8), 397–409.Google Scholar
  93. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 27–43.Google Scholar
  94. Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation. Integrating technological, market and organizational change (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  96. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. van den Hooff, B., de Leeuw, & van Weenen, F. (2004). Committed to share: Commitment and CMC Use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–532.Google Scholar
  99. von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. von Hippel, E. (2004). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  101. von Tunzelmann, N., & Acha, V. (2005). Innovation in “low-tech” industries. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 407–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Welge, M. K., & Al-Laham, A. (2008). Strategisches Management: Grundlagen–Prozess–Implementierung (5th ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  103. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 71–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wiendahl, H. P., Dreher, C., & Engelbrecht, A. (Eds.). (2005). Erfolgreich kooperieren. Best-Practice-Beispiele ausgezeichneter Zusammenarbeit. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.Google Scholar
  105. Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 159–184). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Competence Center Industrial and Service InnovationsFraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISIKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Furtwangen University (FHU)Villingen-SchwenningenGermany

Personalised recommendations