Neurologically Inspired Computational Cognitive Modelling of Situation Awareness

  • Dilhan J. Thilakarathne
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8609)

Abstract

How information processes in the human brain relate to action formation is an interesting research question and with the latest development of brain imaging and recording techniques more and more interesting insights have been uncovered. In this paper a cognitive model is scrutinized which is based on cognitive, affective, and behavioural science evidences for situation awareness. Situation awareness has been recognized as an important phenomenon in almost all domains where safety is of highest importance and complex decision making is inevitable. This paper discusses analysis, modelling and simulation of three scenarios in the aviation domain where poor situation awareness plays a main role, and which have been explained by Endsley according to her three level situation awareness model. The computational model presented in this paper is driven by the interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes in action formation together with processes and states such as: perception, attention, intention, desires, feeling, action preparation, ownership, and communication. This type of cognitively and neurologically inspired computational models provide new directions for the artificial intelligence community to develop systems that are more aligning with realistic human mental processes and for designers of interfaces of complex systems.

Keywords

Situation Awareness Perception Attention Intention Bottom-Up Top-Down Cognitive Modelling and Simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Monsell, S.: Task switching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 134–140 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore, J., Haggard, P.: Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 136–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engel, A.K., Fries, P., Singer, W.: Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 704–716 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haggard, P.: Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 934–946 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiefer, M.: Top-down modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: A gating framework. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 3, 289–306 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Ostilio, K., Garraux, G.: Brain mechanisms underlying automatic and unconscious control of motor action. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haynes, J.-D.: Decoding and predicting intentions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1224, 9–21 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.G.: Pilot situation awareness training in general aviation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 357–360. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Endsley, M.R.: Situation Awareness and Human Error: Designing to Support Human Performance. In: Proceedings of the High Consequence Systems Surety Conference, Albuquerque, NM (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dominguez, C.: Can SA be defined? In: Vidulich, M., Dominguez, C., Vogel, E., McMillan, G. (eds.) Situation awareness: Papers and annotated bibliography (AL/CFTR- 1994-0085), pp. 5–15. Armstrong Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endsley, M.R.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 97–101. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Endsley, M.R.: Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J. (eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thilakarathne, D.J.: Modeling Dynamics of Cognitive Control in Action Formation with Intention, Attention, and Awareness. In: Proc. of the International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT). IEEE Press (to appear)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uhlarik, J., Comerford, D.A.: A Review of Situation Awareness Literature Relevant to Pilot Surveillance Functions: Final Report. General Books LLC (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Endsley, M.R.: Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wickens, C.D.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Harper Collins, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katsuki, F., Constantinidis, C.: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention: Different Processes and Overlapping Neural Systems. The Neuroscientist (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Damasio, A.R.: Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Pantheon Books, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James, W.: What is an Emotion? Mind 9, 188–205 (1884)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Treur, J.: A computational agent model incorporating prior and retrospective ownership states for actions. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 2, 54–67 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pessoa, L.: How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 160–166 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tallon-Baudry, C.: On the Neural Mechanisms Subserving Consciousness and Attention. Front. Psychol. 2 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baluch, F., Itti, L.: Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends Neurosci. 34, 210–224 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller, E.K., Cohen, J.D.: An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller, E.K.: The prefontral cortex and cognitive control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 59–65 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rigoni, D., Brass, M., Roger, C., Vidal, F., Sartori, G.: Top-down modulation of brain activity underlying intentional action and its relationship with awareness of intention: an ERP/Laplacian analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 229, 347–357 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Treur, J.: An integrative dynamical systems perspective on emotions. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 4, 27–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cramoisi, G.: Air Crash Investigations: Running Out of Fuel, How Air Transat 236 Managed to Fly 100 Miles without Fuel and Land Safely. Mabuhay Publishing (2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilhan J. Thilakarathne
    • 1
  1. 1.Agent Systems Research Group, Department of Computer ScienceVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations