Advertisement

Jan Patočka: From the Concept of Evidence to the Natural World and Beyond

  • L’ubica Učník
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 76)

Abstract

In this paper, I call attention to certain themes that are present in Patočka ’s PhD dissertation of 1931, The Concept of Evidence and its Significance for Knowledge [Pojem Evidence a Jeho Význam pro Noetiku]; in which he outlines a historical account of the concept of evidence by considering the methodology of modern science based on modern epistemology as inaugurated by René Descartes . For Patočka , Husserl does not offer a finished philosophy but rather provides the best possible philosophical attempt so far at answering the question of evidence inherited from modern epistemology . I argue that certain concerns that are present in his PhD dissertation never leave Patočka ’s thinking. In Patočka ’s view, we need to rethink phenomenology, not abandon it.

Keywords

History of thinking Concept of evidence Descartes Rationalism Empiricism Cognition Scientific reasoning Truth Meaning constitution 

References

  1. Blecha, Ivan. 1997. Jan Patočka. Malé Monografie. Olomouc: Votobia.Google Scholar
  2. Descartes, René. 1985. Principles of philosophy. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Trans. John Cottingham. ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, vol. I, 177–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. David Carr. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Husserl, Edmund. 1998. The Paris Lectures. Trans. Peter Koestenbaum. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. The Idea of Phenomenology: A Translation of Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Husserliana II. Trans. Lee Hardy. Edmund Husserl Collected Works, vol. 8. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar, Unified (with all variants from the 1781 and 1787) Ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  8. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1934 [1765]. New essays on the human understanding. In Philosophical Writings, Trans. Mary Morris, 141–191. London/New York: J. M. Dent and Sons/E. P. Dutton and Co.Google Scholar
  9. Locke, John. 1976 [1690]. An essay concerning human understanding, Abridged ed, ed. John W. Yolton. London/New York: Dent and Dutton.Google Scholar
  10. Mensch, James R. 1981. The question of being in Husserl’s logical investigations, Phänomenologica 81. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Patočka, Jan. 1992 [1933]. Doslov [Afterword]. In René Descartes: Rozprava o Metodě, 65–68. Praha: Svoboda.Google Scholar
  12. Patočka, Jan. 1993. Úvod do Fenomenologické Filosofie [Introduction to phenomenological philosophy]. Praha: ISE, Oikoymenh, Edice Oikúmené, ve spolupráci s Archivem Jana Patočky.Google Scholar
  13. Patočka, Jan. 1996. An Introduction to Husserl’s Phenomenology. Trans. Erazim Kohák. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  14. Patočka, Jan. 2008 [1931]. Pojem Evidence a Jeho Význam pro Noetiku [The concept of evidence and its significance for noetics]. In Fenomenologické Spisy I: Přirozený Svět. Texty z Let 1931 – 1949, ed. Ivan Chvatík and Jan Frei, 14–125. Sebrané Spisy Jana Patočky. Svazek 6. Praha: Oikoymenh.Google Scholar
  15. Patočka, Jan. 2008 [1936]. Přirozený Svět Jako Filosofický Problém [The natural world as a philosophical problem]. In Fenomenologické Spisy I: Přirozený Svět. Texty z Let 1931 – 1949, ed. Ivan Chvatík and Jan Frei, 127–260. Sebrané Spisy Jana Patočky. Svazek 6. Praha: Oikoymenh.Google Scholar
  16. Patočka, Jan. 2009 [1969]. ‘Přirozený Svět’ v Meditaci Svého Autora po Třiatřiceti Letech [“The Natural World” reconsidered thirty-three years later]. In Fenomenologické Spisy II: Co je Existence. Publikované Texty z Let 1965 – 1977, ed. Pavel Kouba and Ondřej Švec, 265–334. Sebrané Spisy Jana Patočky. Svazek 7. Praha: Oikoymenh.Google Scholar
  17. Rezek, Petr. 2010. Fenomén, Jev a Originál [Phenomenon, appearance and the original]. In Jan Patočka a Věc Fenomenologie, 9–28. Praha: Jan Placák, Ztichlá Klika.Google Scholar
  18. Schuhmann, Karl. 1987. Husserl and Patočka. Proměny 24(1): 34–41.Google Scholar
  19. Tholt, Pavol. 2003. Patočka a Vznik Matematickej Prírodovedy [Patočka and the emergence of mathematical science]. Košice: Vydavatel’stvo Interart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy, School of ArtsMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations