Look on the Bright Side: A Model of Cognitive Change in Virtual Agents

  • Juan Martínez-Miranda
  • Adrián Bresó
  • Juan Miguel García-Gómez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8637)

Abstract

The modelling of empathic reactions in virtual agents has been recognised as a key aspect to improve agent-user relationship. Empathy is particularly important in a virtual agent used in computer-based psychotherapy applications. From a clinical perspective, it is more useful to produce therapeutic-empathy responses in the agent and not only natural empathic reactions as response to patient’s inputs. Based on Gross’s theory of emotion regulation, this paper presents a model of cognitive change used to reappraise with a more positive perspective those negative situations reported by the user and provide an adequate emotional reaction during the interaction. An initial evaluation of the model is also presented and the further work is described.

Keywords

affective process modelling emotion regulation reappraisal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bickmore, T., Mauer, D.: Modalities for building relationships with handheld computer agents. ACM Press, New York (April 2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bickmore, T., Gruber, A.: Relational agents in clinical psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 18(2), 119–130 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosse, T., de Lange, F.P.J.: Development of Virtual Agents with a Theory of Emotion Regulation. In: Proc. of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI-IAT 2008, vol. 2, pp. 461–468 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosse, T., Pontier, M., Siddiqui, G.F., Treur, J.: Incorporating Emotion Regulation into Virtual Stories. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 339–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosse, T., Pontier, M., Treur, J.: A computational model based on Gross’ emotion regulation theory. Cognitive Systems Research 11, 211–230 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cartreine, J.A., Ahern, D.K., Locke, S.E.: A roadmap to computer-based psychotherapy in the United States. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 18(2), 80–95 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark, A.J.: Empathy in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Perspectives and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dias, J., Paiva, A.: Feeling and Reasoning: A Computational Model for Emotional Characters. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds.) EPIA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3808, pp. 127–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, J.J.: Emotion Regulation in Adulthood: Timing is Everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10(6), 214–219 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross, J.J., Thompson, R.A.: Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations. In: Gross, J.J. (ed.) Handbook of Emotion Regulation, pp. 3–24. Guilford Press (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoorn, J.F., Pontier, M., Siddiqui, G.F.: When the user is instrumental to robot goals. First try: Agent uses agent. In: Proc. of IEEE/WIC/ACM Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology WI-IAT 2008, vol. 2, pp. 296–301 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoorn, J.F., Pontier, M., Siddiqui, G.F.: Coppélius’ concoction: Similarity and complementarity among three affect-related agent models. Cognitive Systems Research 15-16, 33–49 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsella, S., Gratch, J.: Modeling Coping Behavior in Virtual Humans Don’t Worry, Be Happy. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - AAMAS (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marsella, S., Gratch, J. E.: A model of emotional dynamics. Cognitive Systems Research 10(1), 70–90 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martínez-Miranda, J., Bresó, A., García-Gómez, J.M.: Modelling Two Emotion Regulation Strategies as Key Features of Therapeutic Empathy. Under Review (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press (1988)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puskar, K., Schlenk, E., Callan, J., Bickmore, T., Sereika, S.: Relational Agents as an Adjunct in Treating Schizophrenia: Case Studies. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 49(8), 22–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rizzo, A., Forbell, E., Lange, B., Buckwalter, J.G., Williams, J., Sagae, K., Traum, D.: SimCoach: An Online Intelligent Virtual Agent System for Breaking Down Barriers to Care for Service Members and Veterans. In: Healing War Trauma: A Handbook of Creative Approaches. Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogers, C.R.: On Becoming a Person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Constable and Company, London (1967)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thwaites, R., Bennett-Levy, J.: Conceptualizing Empathy in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Making the Implicit Explicit. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 35, 291–612 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Martínez-Miranda
    • 1
  • Adrián Bresó
    • 1
  • Juan Miguel García-Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.ITACA Institute, Biomedical Informatics GroupUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations