Advertisement

The Roman Catholic Church and Human Rights in Poland

  • Katarzyna Zielińska
Chapter

Abstract

For a long time, the Roman Catholic Church had a problem with coming to terms with both democracy as a political system and the norm and concept of human rights. Generally speaking, the difficulties were an outcome of the incompatibilities between understanding of the concept of rights in the classical natural law tradition of the Catholic Church and in the theories of natural rights of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The ambivalent attitude of the Roman Catholic Church towards democracy and human rights started to change gradually only in the twentieth century, and particularly so with the Second Vatican Council. Nonetheless, various tensions still persist in several areas.

Poland, with its profound transformations resulting from post-socialist democratization and its strong religious identity as well as the public presence of the Roman Catholic Church, offers an interesting case study for discussing these tensions. The article focuses on two areas that are particularly problematic from the Church’s point of view: freedom of religion and women’s rights. These case studies are preceded by a general introduction to the issues of human rights and religion in Poland.

Keywords

Human rights Poland Roman Catholic Church Women’s rights Freedom of religion 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland as part of the project ‘Religion in the Polish Politics in the Context of European Integration’ (no. 5535/B/H03/2011/40).

References

  1. Apel Biskupów Polskich w sprawie pokoju. (2002). http://www.wiadomosci.archidiecezja.katowice.pl/2002/04/43.htm. Accessed 30 Oct 2012.
  2. ASTRA. (2012). Reclaiming and redefining rights. Warsaw: ASTRA. www.astra.org.pl/pdf/publications/Raport2.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2012.
  3. Barker, E. (1997). But who’s going to win? National and minority religions in post-communist society. In I. Borowik & G. Babiński (Eds.), New religious phenomena in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 7–44). Kraków: Nomos.Google Scholar
  4. Boguszewski, R. (2009). Moralność Polaków po dwudziestu latach przemian. Warszawa: CBOS.Google Scholar
  5. Boguszewski, R. (2009a). Dwie dekady przemian religijności w Polsce. Warszawa: CBOS.Google Scholar
  6. Borowik, I. (2002). The Roman Catholic Church in the process of democratic transformation: the case of Poland. Social Compass, 49, 239– 252.Google Scholar
  7. Carozza, P. G., & Philpott, D. (2012). The Catholic Church, human rights, and democracy: convergence and conflict with the modern state. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought & Culture, 15, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland. (2010). Warszawa: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  10. Doktór, T. (1997). Hinduism in Poland. In I. Borowik & G. Babiński (Eds.), New religious phenomena in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 349–368). Kraków: Nomos.Google Scholar
  11. Doktór, T. (2002). Innowacje religijne: ruchy, uczestnicy, reakcje społeczne. Olsztyn: Mantis.Google Scholar
  12. Eberts, M. W. (1998). The Roman Catholic Church and democracy in Poland. Europe-Asia Studies, 50(5), 817–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer 74.2. In GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5449 data file version 2.2.0. http://zacat.gesis.org/webview. Accessed 10 July 2013.
  14. Feliksiak, M. (2010). Postawy wobec gejów i lesbijek. Warszawa: CBOS. www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2010/K_095_10.PDF. Accessed 10 May 2013.
  15. Gancarczyk, M. (2007). Siła przyzwyczajenia, Gość Niedzielny, 40. http://gosc.pl/doc/757833.Sila-przyzwyczajenia. Accessed 3 Dec 2012.
  16. Grzymała-Moszczyńska, H. (2002). Społeczne reakcje na nowe ruchy religijne (NRR). Nomos Kwartalnik Religioznawczy, 39/40, 55–66.Google Scholar
  17. Helsinki Foundation of Human Rights. (n.d.). http://www.hfhr.pl/en/komitet/o-komitecie/. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.
  18. Herbert, D., & Fras, M. (2009). European enlargement, secularisation and religious re-publicisation in Central and Eastern Europe. Religion, State & Society, 37, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Human Rights Watch. (2011). http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/08/30/poland-reject-blanket-banabortion. Accessed 21 Nov 2012.
  20. II Polski Synod Plenary 1991–1999. (2001). http://synod-katowice.wiara.pl/doc/1334405.II-Polski-Synod-Plenarny. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.
  21. Kucharczyk, P. (2008, June 20). Nam idzie o życie, Gość Niedzielny.Google Scholar
  22. Küng, H. & Bowden, J. St. (2005). Women in Christianity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, N. (2006). Religion, secular beliefs and human rights: 25 years after the 1981 declaration. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Libiszowska-Żółtkowska, M. (2002). Metodologiczne problemy badań nowych ruchów religijnych. Nomos Kwartalnik Religioznawczy, 39/40, 11–28.Google Scholar
  25. ŁG. (2013). Abp Jędraszewski: gender obraca się przeciwko rodzinie i posiadaniu dzieci, Niedziela. Tygodnik katolicki. 18 November 2013. http://www.niedziela.pl/artykul/6810/Abp-Jedraszewski-gender-obraca-sie. Accessed 28 Nov 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Mikulska, A. (2002). Wolność sumienia i wyznania. Raport z monitoring. Warszawa: Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Administration and Digitization of Poland. (n.d.). https://mac.gov.pl/category/dzialania/wyznania/. Accessed Nov 24 2013.
  28. Nathan, C. N. (2013). Changing face of religion and human rights: a personal reflection. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  29. Niedziela. (2013). Abp Jędraszewski: gender obraca się przeciwko rodzinie i posiadaniu dzieci’. http://www.bezuprzedzen.org/doc/Polacy_o_prawach_czlowieka_1998_OBOP.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2013.
  30. Ochrona życia bez kompromisow (2011). http://ekai.pl/polska/zebranie_kep/x43439/ochronazycia-bez-kompromisow/. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.
  31. Ośrodek Badania Opinii Publicznej OBOP. (1998). Polacy a prawa człowieka. Warszawa: OBOP. http://www.bezuprzedzen.org/doc/Polacy_o_prawach_czlowieka_1998_OBOP.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.
  32. Oświadczenie Rady Społecznej przy Arcybiskupie Poznańskim w sprawie wolności religijnej. (2012). http://www.archpoznan.pl/content/view/2434/220. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.
  33. Polish Bishops’ Conference (2011). Komunikat z 356. zebrania plenarnego Konferencji Episkopatu Polski. http://www.episkopat.pl/?a=dokumentyKEP&doc=20111016_0. Accessed 10 Nov 2012.
  34. Polish Bishops’ Conference (2012a). Oświadczenie Prezydium Konferencji Episkopatu Polski. http://episkopat.pl/dokumenty/pozostale/4401.1,Oswiadczenie_Prezydium_Konferencji_Episkopatu_Polski.html. Accessed 2 Dec 2013.
  35. Polish Bishops’ Conference (2012b). W trosce o człowieka i dobro wspólne. Dokument Konferencji Episkopatu Polski przygotowany przez Radę ds. Społecznych. http://www.opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/W/WE/kep/wtrosce_13032012.html. Accessed 2 Dec 2012.
  36. Polska. Official Promotional Website of the Republic of Poland. (n.d.). Human rights in Poland. https://en.polska.pl/Human,Rights,in,Poland,394.html in, Poland,394.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.
  37. Prażmowska, A. (2010). Poland : A modern history. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenne, S. (2002). The perplexities of modern international law: general course on puiblic internatioinal law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Robbers, G. (2012). Challenges in the constitution making process: problems of participation and protecting diversity in the interplay between rule of law and democracy. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergis (Hacettepe Law Review), 2 (2), 178–180. www.hukukdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/dergi/C2S2hakemsiz2.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  40. Ruether, R. R. (2008). Women, reproductive rights and the Catholic Church. Feminist Theology, 16, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schifter, R. (1993). Human rights at the United Nations: the South Africa precedent. American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 8, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The Foundation of International Human Rights Law (n.d.) http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/hr_law.shtml. Accessed 24 Nov 2013.
  43. Wesołowski, W. (2013). Ideologia gender niszczy rodzinę. http://ekai.pl/wydarzenia/temat_dnia/x71384/ideologia-gender-niszczy-rodzine/. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  44. Zielińska, K., & Zwierżdżyński, M. (2012). Religious education in Poland. In D. Davis & E. Miroshnikova (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of religious education (pp. 264–271). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Zubrzycki, G. (2006). The crosses of Auschwitz: nationalism and religion in post-communist Poland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations