Identity and Heritage pp 161-167 | Cite as
The Future Challenges of Heritage and Identity in a Globalized World
Abstract
Heritage and identity studies provide a voice for archaeology and anthropology in ongoing conversations among academic disciplines that have, in recent decades, significantly influenced policy and decision making at national and global levels. Contributors to this book have written about how the past is introduced into the present. Implicit in each chapter is the position that the past is indeed prologue if it is not cast as unrelated events, and that heritage knits together past events in a pattern that is inevitably used to imagine and therefore set a course for the future. Heritage can do this for individual communities that are united by local concerns in ways designed to privilege those communities, but it can also be informed by archaeology and anthropology, becoming a means by which to generate the global public good of knowledge. Many realms of scholarship concerned with the ways that humans are organized into societies, including economics, political science, and legal studies, have borrowed heavily from anthropology in developing arguments and positions that are now elemental in public discourse. A review of how this was done suggests the challenges that must be met in order to reinvigorate the use of archaeological materials in an anthropological approach to heritage and identity for the intellectual and practical benefit of academe and the public at large.
Keywords
World Heritage World Heritage Site Political Objective Global Public Good Heritage ManagementReferences
- Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Binford, L. R. (1968). Archaeological theory and method. In S. R. Binford & L. R. Binford (Eds.), New perspectives in archaeology (pp. 1–3). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2005). Understanding international relations (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Granovetter, M. (2005, Winter). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
- Kagan, D. (2009). Thucydides: The reinvention of history. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
- Mearsheimer, J. (2002). http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people2/Mearsheimer/mearsheimer-con0.html
- Noel-Hume, I. (1964). Archaeology: Handmaiden to history. North Carolina Historical Review, 41(2), 214–225.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, K. (1957). The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi et al. (Eds.), Trade and market in the early empires. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E. (1998). International financial institutions and the provision of international public goods. International financial institutions of the 21st century. Cahiers Papers, European Investment Bank.Google Scholar
- Tobias, P. V. (1957). Bushmen of the Kalahari. Man, 57, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ucko, P. J. (2000). Enlivening a dead past. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 4(2), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Wendt, A. (1992, Spring). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2), 391–425.Google Scholar