Outrunning the Law: Extraterrestrial Liberty and Universal Colonisation
- 962 Downloads
In the depths of space, how will groups and individuals interact? What will the dynamics be when law enforcement is in pursuit of criminals, or when powerful groups try to constrain the activities of lesser ones? Using some very general assumptions, it is possible to paint a picture of how these dynamics could play out. The most likely options for competing groups are either an exodus at a significant fraction of the speed of light, in order to escape their pursuers, or a mass expansion to claim as many resources as possible. Such a mass expansion could also be used to preemptively prevent escape. This paper assumes that future humans are capable of ‘recursive manufacturing’ (expanding their manufacturing base to make full use of any new resources) and that they can copy and co-opt natural processes, including some of the mental processes. Then both expansion and escape will be relatively easy for any reasonably-sized space-faring group. The ultimate shape of human society in space may well depend on which groups expand first, and under which circumstances.
KeywordsCosmic escape and pursuit Cosmic frontiers Intergalactic Fermi paradox Space-faring
We are very grateful for comments, support and help from Milan C′irkovic ′, Pedro Ferreira, Eric Drexler, Nick Bostrom, Timothy Clifton, Toby Ord, Robin Hanson, Daniel Dewey, Nick Beckstead, Charles Cockell, Ian Crawford and Levi Leatherberry.
- Armstrong, S., & Sotala, K. (2012). How we’re predicting ai–or failing to. In J. Romportl, P. Ircing, E. Zackova, M. Polak, & R. Schuster (Eds.), Beyond AI: Artificial dreams (pp. 52–75). Pilsen: University of West Bohemia.Google Scholar
- Armstrong, S., Sotala, K., & hÉigeartaigh, S. O. (2014) .The errors, insights and lessons of famous ai predictions—and what they mean for the future. In Proceedings of the 2012 Oxford Winter Intelligence Conference.Google Scholar
- Banks, I. M. (1994). A few notes on the culture. Originally posted to newsgroup rec.arts.sf.written on 10 Aug 1994. http://www.vavatch.co.uk/books/banks/cultnote.htm.
- Bars, I., & Terning, J. (2009). Extra dimensions in space and time. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bertschinger, E. (1995). Cosmological dynamics. arXiv lecture notes (astro-ph/9503125). http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9503125.
- Bond, A., & Martin, A. (1978). Project daedalus study group: Project daedalus—the final report on the bis starship study. JBIS Interstellar Studies, Supplement.Google Scholar
- Caroti S (2011) Mcfarland.Google Scholar
- Church, G. M., Gao, Y., & Kosuri, S. (2012). Next-generation digital information storage in DNA. Science, 337(6102), 1628. doi: 10.1126/science.1226355. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6102/1628.abstract.Google Scholar
- Drexler, E. (1992). Nanosystems: Chap. appendix A. Methodological issues in theoretical applied science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Forward, R. L. (1995). A transparent derivation of the relativistic rocket equation. In Proceedings of 31 st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Google Scholar
- Freitas, R. A., & Merkle, R. C. (2004). Kinematic self-replicating machines. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience.Google Scholar
- Freitas, R. A., & Zachary, W. B. (1981). A self-replicating, growing lunar factory. In J. Grey, & L.A. Hamdan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Princeton/AIAA Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
- Graneau, P. (1980). Self-energized superconducting mass driver for space launching. In J. Bennett, T. Gora, & P. Kemmey (Eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Electromagnetic Guns and Launchers (Part II).Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 234–245). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. (1998). Burning the cosmic commons: Evolutionary strategies for interstellar colonization Preprint at http://hanson.gmu.edu/filluniv.pdf.
- Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kolm, H., Fine, K., Mongeau, P., & Williams, F (1979). Electromagnetic propulsion alternatives. In J. Grey, & C. Krop (Eds.), Space manufacturing facilities III, Proceedings of the 4th Princeton/AIAA Conference (pp. 299–306).Google Scholar
- Lineweaver, C. H., Fenner, Y., & Gibson, B. K. (2004). The galactic habitable zone and the age distribution of complex life in the milky way. Science, 303(5654), 59–62.Google Scholar
- Peacock, J. A. (1999). Cosmological physics. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- Sandberg, A. (2006). Dyson sphere faq. Retrieved September 01, 2006, from http://www.nada.kth.se/asa/dysonFAQ.html.
- Sandberg, A., & Armstrong, S. (2013). Hunters in the dark: Game theory analysis of the deadly probes scenario. In Poster presented at the National Astronomy Meeting of the Royal Astonomical Society (NAM2013).Google Scholar
- Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N. (2008). Whole brain emulation. a roadmap. Future of Humanity Institute Technical Report #2008-3.Google Scholar
- Sung, V. W. (2008). Lumped parameter modeling of the ideal railgun: Examining maximum electromechanical energy conversion efficiency. In: 2008 ASEE IL/IN Section Conference, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
- Tetlock, P. (2005) Expert political judgement: How good is it? how can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Winglee, R. M., Slough, J., Ziemba, T., & Goodson, A. (2000). Mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion: Tapping the energy of the solar wind for spacecraft propulsion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(A9), 21067–21077.Google Scholar