Advertisement

Decision Support for Operations and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Parks

  • Ole-Erik Vestøl Endrerud
  • Jayantha P. Liyanage
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The world needs cleaner energy, and it needs more to keep up with the growing demand globally. Renewable energy can provide long-term and low emission energy, and wind energy has a large potential. Offshore wind energy capacity in the EU have grown from zero in 1990 to 4 GW in 2011, meeting 0.4 % of electricity demand in the European Union, and the aim is to have 150 GW installed capacity by 2030. However, revenue is an issue in order to make offshore wind energy economically viable in the future, hence, costs must be lowered and at the same time availability must be increased. This paper presents a simulation model developed for research experiments and decision support. It is based on an ongoing project in the North Sea region that investigates configurations of operational infrastructure and work management systems under different governing conditions. The project closely collaborates with one of the largest offshore wind park operators in North Sea, and aims at the use of agent-based and discrete event simulation to experiment with different wind park development scenarios, and to eventually provide decision support for wind park developers and—operators. Despite the use of different modeling techniques in offshore wind sector, the potential benefits of agent-based simulation models in operational planning and work management is still to be explored. The simulation model developed in this paper is based on a multi-method paradigm involving both discrete-event and agent-based modeling. This multi-method approach helps largely in limiting the set of assumptions as well as in managing the drawbacks associated with a specific simulation technique. The paper intends to explain the simulation model developed, discuss the validity of the model and how such models can provide information for decision making in planning and operating offshore wind parks.

Keywords

Wind energy Operation and maintenance Decision support Simulation modeling Agent based modeling Discrete event modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is a part of the Norwegian Centre for Offshore Wind Energy (NORCOWE).

References

  1. 1.
    European Wind Energy Association (2011) Wind in our sails—the coming of Europe’s offshore wind energy industry. European Wind Energy AssociationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Wind Energy Association (2009). The economics of wind energy—a report by the European wind energy association. European Wind Energy AssociationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engels W, Obdam T, Savenije F (2009) Current developments in wind. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Research report ECN-E–09-96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Renewable Energy Agency (2012) Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series—Volume 1: power sector. International Renewable Energy Agency, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scheu M, Matha D, Hofmann M, Muskulus M (2012) Maintenance strategies for large offshore wind farms. Energy Procedia 24:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Besnard F, Fischer K, Tjernberg LB (2013) A model for the optimization of the maintenance support organization for offshore wind farms. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4(2):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen JJ, Sørensen JD (2011) On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(1):218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tian Z, Jin T, Wu B, Ding F (2011) Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring. Renew Energy 36(5):1502–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hofmann M, Heggset J, Nonås LM, Halvorsen-Weare EE (2011) A concept for cost and benefit analysis of offshore wind farms with focus on operation and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 24th international congress on condition monitoring and diagnostics engineering management, Stavanger, Norway, p 8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofmann M, Sperstad IB (2013) NOWIcob—a tool for reducing the maintenance cost of offshore wind farms. In: DeepWind 2013. Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagen B, Simonsen I, Hofmann M, Muskulus M (2013) A multivariate markov weather model for O&M simulation of offshore wind parks. In: DeepWind 2013. Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dinwoodie I, McMillan D, Revie M, Dalgic Y, Lazakis I (2013) Development of a combined operational and strategic decision support model for offshore wind. In: DeepWind 2013. Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofmann M (2011) A review of decision support models for offshore wind farms with an emphasis on operation and maintenance strategies. Wind Eng 35(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonabeu E (2002) Predicting the Unpredictable. Harv Bus RevGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaegi M, Mock R, Kröger W (2009) Analyzing maintenance strategies by agent-based simulations: a feasibility study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(9):1416–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Railsback SF, Grimm V (2012) Agent-based and individual-based modeling: a practical introduction. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borshchev, A Filipov A (2004) From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In: The 22nd international conference of the system dynamics society, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malcolm DJ, Hansen AC (2006) WindPACT turbine rotor design study. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Subcontract report NREL/SR-500-32495Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tavner PJ, Xiang J, Spinato F (2007) Reliability analysis for wind turbines. Wind Energy 10(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo H, Watson S, Tavner P, Xiang J (2009) Reliability analysis for wind turbines with incomplete failure data collected from after the date of initial installation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(6):1057–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Faulstich S, Hahn B, Tavner PJ (2011) Wind turbine downtime and its importance for offshore deployment. Wind Energy 14(3):327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aven T (1992) Reliability and risk analysis. Elsevier Applied Science, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tavner P (2012) Institution of engineering and technology, Offshore wind turbines reliability, availability and maintenance. Institution of Engineering and Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baker RD (1996) Some new tests of the power law process. Technometrics 38(3):256CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Det Norske Veritas (2011) DNV-OS-H101: marine operations, GeneralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faulstich S, Lyding P, Tavner P (2011) Effects of wind speed on wind turbine availability. In: EWEA 2011. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maples B, Saur G, Hand M, van de Pieterman R, Obdam T (2013) Installation, operation, and maintenance strategies to reduce the cost of offshore wind energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Research report TP-5000-57403Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ole-Erik Vestøl Endrerud
    • 1
  • Jayantha P. Liyanage
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations