Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications pp 219-233 | Cite as
Nonlinear Finite Element and Post-Buckling of Large Diameter Thin Walled Tubes
Abstract
This study investigates the crush behaviour of a relatively large diameter, thin walled tube through both experimental and finite element methods. The experiments were conducted using test specimens of cylindrical tube which were placed into a load press, and crushed by a distance of 150 mm. The thin walled tubes were found to collapse through localised buckling, with a folding layered mode of failure. Numerical analysis of the cylindrical tube was conducted using finite element (FE) methods through an explicit analysis (utilising a three dimensional shell model). Through the use of both ductile damage criteria and the Müschenborn–Sonne forming limit diagram (MSFLD), the model was able to initiate buckling failure without creating imperfections. The numerical model exhibited a similar layered, ring-folding mode of failure as observed in the experiment. Shear failure was also analysed, however caused a large amount of element distortion. The model showed a large degree of sensitivity to the coefficient of friction used in contact between the tube and the press. With the careful selection of mesh density, friction coefficient, and material properties, the FE model demonstrated very good correlation with the experiment in terms of critical buckling force and post-buckling response.
Keywords
Finite element analysis Thin wall structure Axial crush testing Post-buckling Non-linearReferences
- Abramowicz W (2003) Thin-walled structures as impact energy absorbers. Thin Walled Struct 41:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alghamdi AAA (2001) Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin Walled Struct 39:189–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bisagni C (2000) Numerical analysis and experimental correlation of composite shell buckling and post-buckling. Compos Part B Eng 31:655–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bisagni C (2005) Dynamic buckling of fiber composite shells under impulsive axial compression. Thin Walled Struct 43:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burlayenko VN, Sadowski T (2014) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of harmonically excited debonded sandwich plates using finite element modelling. Compos Struct 108:354–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dassault Systèmes (2011a) Example problems manual, volume I: static and dynamic analyses. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
- Dassault Systèmes (2011b) Analysis user’s manual, volume III: materials. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
- Dassault Systèmes (2011c) Analysis user’s manual, volume II: analysis. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
- Dassault Systèmes (2011d) Analysis user’s manual, volume V: prescribed conditions, constraints & interaction. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
- Giglio M, Manes A, Viganò F (2012) Ductile fracture locus of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. Int J Mech Sci 54:121–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heinstein MW, Mello FJ, Attaway SW, Laursen TA (2000) Contact—impact modeling in explicit transient dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187:621–40CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Hooputra H, Gese H, Dell H, Werner H (2004) A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions. Int J Crashworthiness 9:449–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheng D, Wriggers P, Sloan SW (2006) Improved numerical algorithms for frictional contact in pile penetration analysis. Comput Geotech 33:341–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Song J, Chen Y, Lu G (2012) Axial crushing of thin-walled structures with origami patterns. Thin Walled Struct 54:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strömberg N (2005) An implicit method for frictional contact, impact and rolling. Eur J Mech – A Solids 24:1016–29CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Sun JS, Lee KH, Lee HP (2000) Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems. J Mater Process Technol 105:110–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wei D, Elgindi MBM (2013) Finite element analysis of the Ramberg–Osgood bar. Am J Comput Math 3:211–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar