Advertisement

Victims, Villains, and Valiant Rescuers: Unpacking Sociolegal Constructions of Human Trafficking and Crimmigration in Popular Culture

  • Edith KinneyEmail author

Abstract

Increasing media attention to human trafficking in the U.S. has expanded awareness of the issue and mobilised campaigns for new anti-trafficking laws aimed to rescue victims and punish those who exploit them. This chapter analyses the sociolegal construction of the subjects of this narrative: victims, villains, and valiant rescuers. Drawing on investigative journalism, television shows, and movies that depict the “war against human trafficking”, I examine the framing of “trafficking” through narratives of crime, sexual risk, and crimmigration. The dual role of law as an instrument for vindicating victims and policing the risks posed by trafficking reflects the influence of “governing through crime” politics and “carceral feminism” in American anti-trafficking efforts. The sociolegal construction of trafficking subjects in American popular culture reveals the important influence of public frames processes in developing the criminal justice response to trafficking that typifies American responses to the problem.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Human Trafficking Trafficking Victim Sexual Slavery Immigration Enforcement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agustín L (2007) Sex at the margins: migration, labour markets and the rescue industry. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aradau C (2004) The perverse politics of four letter words: risk and pity in the securitisation of human trafficking. Millennium J Int Stud 33(2):251–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benford R, Snow D (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26:611–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman J (2006) The left, the right and the prostitute: the making of U.S. antitrafficking in persons policy. Tulane J Int Comp Law 14:269–293Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein E (2007) The sexual politics of the “New Abolitionism”. Differences 18(3):128–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein E (2010) Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: the politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns. Signs J Women Cult Soc 36(1):45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan D (2008) Competing claims of victimhood? Foreign and domestic victims of trafficking in the United States. Sex Res Soc Policy 5(4):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumiller K (2008) In an abusive state: how neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  9. Chacón J (2006) Misery and Myopia: Understanding the failures of U.S. efforts to stop human trafficking. Fordham Law Rev 74:2977–3040Google Scholar
  10. Chacón J (2010) Tensions and tradeoffs: protecting trafficking victims in the era of immigration enforcement. Univ PA Law Rev 158:1609–1653Google Scholar
  11. Chapkis W (2003) Trafficking, migration, and the law: protecting innocents, punishing migrants. Gend Soc 17:923–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapkis W (2005) Soft glove, punishing fist: the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. In: Bernstein E, Schaffner L (eds) Regulating sex: the politics of intimacy and identity. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng S (2008) Muckraking and stories untold: ethnography meets journalism on trafficked women and the U.S. military. Sex Res Soc Policy 5(4):6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chuang J (2006) The United States as global sheriff: using unilateral sanctions to combat human trafficking. Mich J Int Law 27(2):437–494Google Scholar
  15. Doezema J (2000) Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of “White Slavery” in contemporary discourses of “Trafficking in Women”. Gend Issues 18(1):23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doezema J (2001) Ouch! western feminists’ “Wounded Attachment” to the “Third World Prostitute”. Feminist Rev 67:16–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doezema J (2010) Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. Zed Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Doyle A (2003) Arresting images: crime and policing in front of the television camera. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  19. Duguay C (2005) Human trafficking. Lifetime TVGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkins J (2007) Popular culture, legal films, and legal film critics. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev 40:745–791Google Scholar
  21. Empower Chiang Mai (2003) A report by Empower Chiang Mai on the human rights violations women are subjected to when “Rescued” by anti-trafficking groups who employ methods using deception, force and coercion. Empower Foundation, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  22. Ewick P, Silbey S (1998) The common place of law: stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. GAATW (2007) Collateral damage: the impact of anti-trafficking measures on human rights around the world, global alliance against traffic in women, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallagher A (2009) Human rights and human trafficking: quagmire or firm ground? A response to James Hathaway. VA J Int Law 49(4):789–848Google Scholar
  25. Garland D (1990) Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Government Accountability Office (2006) Human trafficking: better data, strategy, and reporting needed to enhance U.S. antitrafficking efforts abroad. Trend Organ Crime 10(1):16–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gulati G (2011) News frames and story triggers in the media’s coverage of human trafficking. Hum Rights Rev 12:363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guthrie M (2005) “Trafficking” in sex slaves. New York Daily NewsGoogle Scholar
  29. Halley J et al (2006) From the international to the local in feminist legal responses to rape, prostitution/sex work, and sex trafficking: four studies in contemporary governance feminism. Harv J Law Gend 29:335–423Google Scholar
  30. Haltom W, McCann MW (2004) Distorting the law: politics, media, and the litigation crisis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haynes DF (2007) (Not) found chained to a bed in a brothel: conceptual, procedural and legal failures fulfill the promise of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Georget Immgr Law J 21:377–381Google Scholar
  32. Haynes D (2014) The celebritization of human trafficking. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 653(1):25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heath L, Gilbert K (1996) Mass media and the fear of crime. Am Behav Sci 39(4):379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hesford W, Kozol W (eds) (2005) Just advocacy?: Women’s human rights, transnational feminisms, and the politics of representation. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes D (2000) The “Natasha” trade: the transnational shadow market of trafficking in women. J Int Aff 53(2):625–651Google Scholar
  36. Human Rights Watch (2010) Off the streets: arbitrary detention and other abuses against sex workers in Cambodia. Human Rights Watch, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Iyengar S, Kinder DR (2010) News that matters: television and American opinion, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karnasiewicz S (2005) Sex sells. Salon.com. http://www.salon.com/2005/10/26/sexslaves/. Accessed 17 Oct 2013
  39. Kempadoo K et al (eds) (2005) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: new perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Paradigm Publishers, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  40. Kohm S, Greenhill P (2011) Pedophile crime films as popular criminology: a problem of justice? Theor Criminol 15:195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kovera MB (2002) The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law Hum Behav 26:43–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kreuzpainter M (2007) Trade. Lions GateGoogle Scholar
  43. Landesman P (2004) The girls next door. New York Times MagazineGoogle Scholar
  44. Langum D (1994) Crossing over the line: legislating morality and the Mann Act. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  45. Leon C (2011) Sex fiends, perverts, and pedophiles: understanding sex crime policy in America. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Luibhéid E (2002) Entry denied: controlling sexuality at the border. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  47. Malarek V (2004) The Natashas: inside the new global sex trade. Arcade, Time Warner Book Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Mason P (ed) (2003) Criminal visions: media representations of crime and justice. Willan, Cullompton/PortlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Morel P (Director) (2008) Taken [Motion Picture] United States, Twentieth Century Fox Home EntertainmentGoogle Scholar
  50. Munro V (2008) Of rights and rhetoric: discourses of degradation and exploitation in the context of sex trafficking. J Law Soc 35(2):240–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nathan D (2005) Oversexed. The Nation 281(6):27–30. http://www.thenation.com/article/oversexed. Accessed 17 Oct 2013
  52. Rafter N (2006) Shots in the mirror. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Rafter N (2007) Crime, film, and criminology: recent sex crime movies. Theor Criminol 11(3):403–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raney A (2005) Punishing media criminals and moral judgment: the impact on enjoyment. Media Psychol 37(2):145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarat A, Kearns TR (1995) Law in everyday life. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  56. Shafer J (2004) Doubting Landesman. Slate Magazine. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/2004/01/doubting_landesman.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2013
  57. Shales T (2005) “Human Trafficking”: exploiting misery, and creating it. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/23/AR2005102301514.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2013
  58. Shrum LJ (ed) (2003) The psychology of entertainment media: blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  59. Simon J (2000) Megan’s law: crime and democracy in late modern America. Law Soc Inq 25(4):1111–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon J (2007) Governing through crime: how the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Soderlund G (2005) Running from the rescuers: new U.S. crusades against sex trafficking and the rhetoric of abolition. Feminist Formations 17(3):64–87Google Scholar
  62. Soderlund G (2011) The rhetoric of revelation: sex trafficking and the journalistic expose. Humanity 2(2):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sparks R (1990) Dramatic power: television images of crime and law enforcement. In: Sumner C (ed) Censure, politics, and criminal justice. Milton Keynes [England]; Open University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  64. Srikantiah J (2007) Perfect victims and real survivors: the iconic victim in domestic human trafficking law. Boston Univ Law Rev 87:157–211Google Scholar
  65. Stumpf J (2006) The crimmigration crisis: immigrations, crime and sovereign power. Am Univ Law Rev 56:367–419Google Scholar
  66. Todres J (2009) Law, otherness, and human trafficking. Santa Clara Law Rev 49:605–672Google Scholar
  67. Tyler TR (2006) Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. Yale Law J 115:1050–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walkowitz J (1980) Prostitution and Victorian society: women, class and the state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weitzer R (2007) The social construction of sex trafficking: ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Polit Soc 35:447–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilson JC, Ackerman E (2012) “Tort Tales” and TV judges: amplifying, modifying, or countering the antitort narrative? Law Soc Rev 46(1):105–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Young A (2008) Culture, critical criminology and the imagination of crime. In: Anthony T, Cunneen C (eds) The critical criminology companion. Hawkins, LeichhardtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Justice StudiesSan José State UniversitySan JoséUSA

Personalised recommendations