Advertisement

The Functional Design and Phylogeny of Women’s Sexuality

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Evolutionary Psychology book series (EVOLPSYCH)

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, extensive research has documented that estrus in women is present, not absent due to evolutionary loss, as scholars concluded erroneously by the middle of the last century. Estrus in women is a set of sexual preferences, manifested in the fertile window of the menstrual cycle, for mates with traits that connote male phenotypic and genetic quality. We hypothesize that women’s estrus is an adaptation that functions to obtain genes, including conditionally via extra-pair copulation, that enhance offspring reproductive value. Women’s estrus is ancient phylogenetically, and has homology and functional similarity with estrus throughout vertebrates. Women’s sexuality at infertile cycle points and other infertile times is referred to as “extended sexuality.” It is common in Old World primates and probably in pair-bonding, socially monogamous birds. The kinds of preferences associated with women’s extended sexuality are consistent with the hypothesis that its function is to obtain nongenetic material benefits and services from males by exchanging sexual access for them. Concealed estrus is present in women as evidenced by men’s limited ability (compared to other male mammals) to detect estrus, women’s limited behavioral changes (compared to other female mammals) during estrus, and estrous women’s efforts to limit male mate guarding. Evidence supports the hypothesis that concealed estrus is adaptation that functions in extra-pair-bond copulation to cuckold the main partner in service of better genes for offspring, while maintaining the main partner’s material benefits. Research findings indicate that women’s estrogen-based sexual ornaments honestly signal residual reproductive value.

Keywords

Concealed estrus Estrus Extended female sexuality Extra-pair copulation Female sexuality Good genes Mate guarding Men Ornaments Women 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. (1990). How Did Humans Evolve? Reflections on the Uniquely Unique Species. Special Publication No. 1, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N. A. Chagnon & W. G. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 436–453). North Scituate: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. M., & Bielert, C. (1994). Adolescent exaggeration in female catarrhine primates. Primates, 35, 283–300.Google Scholar
  4. Arnqvist, G., & Nilsson, T. (2000). The evolution of polyandry: Multiple matings and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour, 60, 145–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, R. R. (1997). Copulation, masturbation and infidelity: State-of-the-art. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer, & K. Schafer (Eds.) New aspects of human ethology (pp. 163–188). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Beach, F. A. (1976). Sexual attractivity, proceptivity and receptivity in female mammals. Hormones and Behavior, 7, 105–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckerman, S., Lizarralde, R., Ballew, C., Schroeder, S., Fingelton, E., Garrison, A., et al. (1998). The Bari partible paternity project: Preliminary results. Current Anthropology, 39, 164–167.Google Scholar
  10. Benshoof, L., & Thornhill, R. (1979). The evolution of monogamy and concealed ovulation in humans. Journal of Social and Biological Structure, 2, 95–106.Google Scholar
  11. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1992). Sperm competition in birds: Evolutionary causes and consequences. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (Eds.), (1998). Sperm competition and sexual selection. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 163–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewis, A., & Meyer, M. (2005). Demographic evidence that human ovulation is undetectable (at least in pair bonds). Current Anthropology, 46, 465–471.Google Scholar
  15. Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human n ature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burley, N. (1979). The evolution of concealed ovulation. American Naturalist, 114, 835–858.Google Scholar
  17. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar
  18. Cantu, S. M., Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Weisberg, Y. J., Durante, K. M., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Fertile and selectively flirty: Women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 25, 431–438.Google Scholar
  19. Cardenas, R. A., & Harris, L. J. (2007). Do women’s preferences for symmetry change across the cycle? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 96–105.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A. P. (2004). Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women’s sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 113–124.Google Scholar
  21. Clutton–Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.Google Scholar
  22. Corner, G. (1942). The hormones in human reproduction. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  23. Crews, D. & Silver, R. (1985). Reproductive physiology and behavior interactions in non-mammalian vertebrates. In N. T. Adler, D. Pfaff, & R. W. Goy (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology (pp. 101–182). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  24. Domb, L. G., & Pagel, M. (2001). Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature, 410, 204–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunson, D. B., Baird, D. D., Wilcox, A. J., & Weinberg, C. R. (1999). Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation. Human Reproduction, 14, 1835–1839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Baird, D. D., Kesner, J. S., & Wilcox, A. J. (2001). Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 965–978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellison, P. T. (2001). On fertile ground: A natural history of reproduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Effects of menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Firman, R. C., Simmons, L. W., Cummins, J. M., & Matson, P. L. (2003). Are body fluctuating asymmetry and the ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length reliable predictors of semen quality? Human Reproduction, 18, 808–812.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Frost, P. (1994). Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: Preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Perception and Motor Skills, 79, 507–514.Google Scholar
  32. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997a). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–195). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997b). The evolutionary psychology of extra-pair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.Google Scholar
  34. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s women’s preference for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927–933.Google Scholar
  35. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 402–416.Google Scholar
  36. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2003a). Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 231–241.Google Scholar
  37. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2003b). Fluctuating asymmetry, developmental instability, and fitness: Toward model-based interpretation. In M. Polak (Ed.), Developmental instability: Causes and consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 975–982.Google Scholar
  39. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays shift across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner fluctuating asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2023–2027.Google Scholar
  41. Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Cousins, A. J., & Thornhill, R. (2014). Intersexual conflict across women’s ovulatory cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 302–304 .Google Scholar
  42. Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Simpson, J. A., & Cousins, A. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010a). Fertility in the cycle predicts women’s interest in sexual opportunism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 400–411.Google Scholar
  44. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010b). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partner’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 412–424.Google Scholar
  45. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. (2006). MHC alleles, sexually responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Hormonal correlates of women’s women’s mid-cycle preference for scent of symmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 223–232. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.007.Google Scholar
  47. Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Geary, D. C., & Flinn, M. V. (2001). Evolution of human parental behavior and the human family. Parenting, 1, 5–61.Google Scholar
  49. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental biology, (6th ed). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035438 .
  51. Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., Larson, C. M., & Pillsworth, E. G. (2012). Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: Evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 157–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17, 265–282.Google Scholar
  53. Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P. et al. (2005). Mate retention, sperm displacement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.Google Scholar
  54. Grammer, K. (1993). 5-α-androst-16-en-3α-on: A male pheromone? A brief report. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 201–214.Google Scholar
  55. Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Journal in Psychological Science, 24, 2106–2010.Google Scholar
  56. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of women’s short-term mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.Google Scholar
  57. Gueguen, N. (2009). The receptivity of women to courtship solicitation across the menstrual cycle: A field experiment. Biological Psychology, 80, 321–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hammerstein, P., & Parker, G. A. (1987). Sexual selection: Games between the sexes. In J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson (Eds.) Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives (pp. 119–142). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding efforts across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Haselton, M. G., & Gildersleeve, K. (2011). Can men detect ovulation? Psychological Science, 20, 87–92.Google Scholar
  61. Haselton, M., & Miller, G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17, 40–73.Google Scholar
  62. Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256–259.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Hawkes, K. (2004). Mating, parenting, and the evolution of human pairbonds. In B. Chapais & C.M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 443–473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Jones, N. G. B. (2001). Hunting and nuclear families: Some lessons from the Hadza about men’s work. Current Anthropology, 42, 681–709.Google Scholar
  65. Heistermann, M., Ziegler, T., van Schaik, C. P., Launhardt, K., Winkler, P., & Hodges, J. K. (2001). Loss of oestrus, concealed ovulation and paternity confusion in free-ranging hanuman langurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 2445–2451.Google Scholar
  66. Hill, K. (1982). Hunting and human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 521–544.Google Scholar
  67. Hrdy, S. B. (1979). Infanticide among animals, a review, classification and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 3–40.Google Scholar
  68. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Hrdy, S. B. (2000). The optimal number of fathers: Evolution, demography, and history in the shaping of female mate preferences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 75–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Hrdy, S. B., & Whitten, P. L. (1987). Patterning of sexual activity. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 370–384). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Hummel, T., Gollisch, R., Wildt, G., & Kobal, G. (1991). Changes in olfactory perception during the menstrual cycle. Experientia, 47, 712–715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Jasiénska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1213–1217.Google Scholar
  73. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Johnston, V. S. & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183–199.Google Scholar
  75. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.Google Scholar
  76. Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection: Results from five populations (with a foreword by D. Symons). Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  77. Jones, R. E. (1978). The vertebrate ovary: Comparative biology and evolution. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  78. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., et al. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1985). Hunting ability and reproductive success among male Ache foragers: Preliminary tests. Current Anthropology, 26, 131–133.Google Scholar
  80. Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar
  81. Key, C. A., & Aiello, L. C. (1999). The evolution of social organization. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture (pp. 15–33). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451–463.Google Scholar
  83. Lancaster, J. B., & Lancaster, C. S. (1983). Parental investment: The hominid adaptation. In D. Ortner (Ed.), Parental care in mammals (pp. 347–387). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  84. Lange, I. G., Hartel, A., & Meyer, H. H. D. (2002). Evolution of oestrogen functions in vertebrates. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 83, 219–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Larson, C. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2012). Ovulatory shifts in women’s attractions to primary partners and other men: Further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness. PLoS One, 7, e44456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044456.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Liley, N. R., & Stacey, N. E. (1983). Hormones, pheromones, and reproductive behavior in fish. Fish Physiology, 9, 1–63.Google Scholar
  87. Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Petrie, M., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preference for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1777–1785. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 39–44.Google Scholar
  89. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007a). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 633–639.Google Scholar
  90. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007b). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76, 209–216.Google Scholar
  91. Little, A. C., Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Corri, W. (2008a). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition, 106, 1537–1547.Google Scholar
  92. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2008b). Preferences for variation in masculinity in real male faces change when they are more fertile. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 478–482.Google Scholar
  93. Lombardi, J. (1998). Comparative vertebrate reproduction. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  94. Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). The origins of man. Science, 211, 341–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Low, B. S., Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1987). Human hips, breasts, buttocks: Is fat deceptive? Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 249–257.Google Scholar
  96. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998a). The ratio of the 2nd to the 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004.Google Scholar
  97. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998b). Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 273–282.Google Scholar
  98. Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., & Henzi, P. (2003). Melanin and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, 131–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.Google Scholar
  100. Marlowe, F. (1999). Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 57–64.Google Scholar
  101. Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42, 755–760.Google Scholar
  102. Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.Google Scholar
  103. Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Is human ovulation concealed? Evidence from conception beliefs in a hunter–gatherer society. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 427–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Mesnick, S. L. (1997). Sexual alliances: Evidence and evolutionary implications. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (pp. 207–260). New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  105. Miller, E. M. (1995). Human breasts: Evolutionary origins as a deceptive signal of need for provisioning and temporary infertility. Mankind Quarterly, 36, 135–150.Google Scholar
  106. Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the e volution of human nature. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  107. Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Møller, A. P., Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: Asymmetry and sexual selection. Animal Behaviour, 70, 497–506.Google Scholar
  109. Nelson, R. J. (2000). An introduction to behavioral endocrinology (2nd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  110. Pagel, M. (1994). Evolution of conspicuous estrous advertisement in old-world monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1333–1341.Google Scholar
  111. Pagel, M., & Meade, A. (2006). Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. American Naturalist, 167, 808–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Palombit, R. A. (1999). Infanticide and the evolution of pairbonds in nonhuman primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7, 117–129.Google Scholar
  113. Parker, G. A. (1979a). Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In M. Blum & N. Blum (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (pp. 123–166). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  114. Parker, G. A. (1979b). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–568.Google Scholar
  115. Pawlowski, B., & Jasiénska, G. (2005). Women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and expected duration of relationship. Biological Psychology, 70, 38–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Pazol, K. (2003). Mating in the Kakamega forest blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis): Does female sexual behavior function to manipulate paternity assessment? Behaviour, 140, 473–499.Google Scholar
  117. Penton–Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically—Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39–48.Google Scholar
  118. Penton–Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 30, 219–259.Google Scholar
  119. Penton–Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Nature, 399, 741–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Penton–Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton–Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoskikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Pillsworth, E. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 55–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Platek, S. M., Raines, D. M., Gallup, G. G., Mohamed, F. B., Thomson, J. W., Myers, T. E., Panyayin, I. S., Levin, S. L., Davis, J. A., Fonteyn, L. C. M., & Arigo, D. R. (2004). Reactions to children’s faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 394–405.Google Scholar
  124. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.Google Scholar
  125. Puts, D. A. (2006). Cyclic variation in women’s preferences for masculine traits: Potential hormonal causes. Human Nature, 17, 114–127.Google Scholar
  126. Rantala, M. J., Eriksson, C. J. P., Vainikka, A., & Kortet, R. (2006). Male steroid hormones and female preference for male body odor. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 259–260.Google Scholar
  127. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 186–201.Google Scholar
  128. Rikowski, A. & Grammer, K. (1999). Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 869–874.Google Scholar
  129. Rodriguez-Gironés, M. A., & Enquist, M. (2001). The evolution of female sexuality. Animal Behaviour, 61, 695–704.Google Scholar
  130. Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1913–1917.Google Scholar
  131. Schroder, I. (1993). Concealed ovulation and clandestine copulation: A female contribution to human evolution. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 381–389.Google Scholar
  132. Scutt, D., & Manning, J. T. (1996). Symmetry and ovulation in women. Human Reproduction, 11, 2477–2480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Guta, F. E., & Schmitt, D. P. (2006). Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation in humans: Concurrent or compensatory anti-cuckoldry tactics? Human Nature, 17, 239–252.Google Scholar
  134. Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2002). Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution of Human Behavior, 23, 123–138.Google Scholar
  135. Sheldon, M. S., Cooper, M. L., Geary, D. C., Hoard, M., & DeSoto, M. C. (2006). Fertility cycle patterns in motives for sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1659–1673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Sillén-Tullberg, B., & Møller, A. P. (1993). The relationship between concealed ovulation and mating systems in anthropoid primates—a phylogenetic analysis. American Naturalist, 141, 1–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N., & Leck, K. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 159–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Skau, P. A., & Folstad, I. (2003). Do bacterial infections cause reduced ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis of antibiotic treatment of male infertility. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 40–47.Google Scholar
  139. Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601–660). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  140. Smock, T., Albeck, D., & Stark, P. (1998). A peptidergic basis for sexual behavior in mammals. Progress in Brain Research, 119, 467–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 3, 1–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.Google Scholar
  143. Soler, C., Núñez, M., Gutiérrez, R., Núñez, J., Medina, P., Sancho, M., et al. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 199–207.Google Scholar
  144. Spuhler, J. N. (1979). Continuities and discontinuities in anthropoid-hominid behavioral evolution: Bipedal locomotion and sexual receptivity. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological p erspective (pp. 454–461). North Scituate: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  145. Stacey, P. B. (1982). Female promiscuity and male reproductive success in social birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 120, 51–64.Google Scholar
  146. Strassmann, B. I. (1981). Sexual selection, paternal care, and concealed ovulation in humans. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 31–40.Google Scholar
  147. Strassmann, B. I. (1996). Menstrual cycle visits by Dogon women: A hormonal test distinguishes deceit from honest signaling. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 304–315.Google Scholar
  148. Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.) Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  150. Szalay, F. S., & Costello, R. K. (1991). Evolution of permanent estrus displays in hominids. Journal of Evolution, 20, 439–464.Google Scholar
  151. Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  152. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999a). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.Google Scholar
  153. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999b). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 452–460.Google Scholar
  154. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2003). Do women have evolved adaptation for extra-pair copulation? In E. Voland & K. Grammer (Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 341–368). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  155. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  156. Thornhill, R., & Grammer, K. (1999). The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 105–120.Google Scholar
  157. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  158. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615.Google Scholar
  159. Thornhill, R., Chapman, J. F., & Gangestad, S. W. (2013). Women’s preferences or men’s scents associated with testosterone and cortisol levels: Patterns across the ovulatory cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 216–221.Google Scholar
  160. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., Knight, J., & Franklin, M. (2003). MHC, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668–678.Google Scholar
  161. Turke, P. W. (1984). Effects of ovulatory concealment and synchrony on protohominid mating systems and parental roles. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 33–44.Google Scholar
  162. Van Dongen, S., Ten Broek, C. M. A., Galis, F., & Wijnaendts, L. C. D. (2012). No association between fluctuating asymmetry in highly stabilized traits and second and fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in human fetuses. Early Human Development, 85, 393–398.Google Scholar
  163. van Schaik, C. P., Prodham, G. R., & Van Noordwijk, M. A. (2004). Mating conflict in primates: Infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In P. Kappler & C. van Schaik (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 131–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  164. Wakano, J. Y., & Ihara, Y. (2005). Evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: Game-theoretical and two-locus diploid models. The American Naturalist, 166, E32–E44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Wallen, K. (2000). Risky business: Social context and hormonal modulation of primate sex drive. In K. Wallen & J. E. Schneider (Eds.) Reproduction in Context (pp. 289–323). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  166. Weisfeld, G. E., & Woodward, L. (2004). Current evolutionary perspectives on adolescent romantic relations and sexuality. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 11–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Westermarck, E. (1929). Marriage. New York: Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith.Google Scholar
  168. Whittier, J. M., & Tokarz, R. R. (1992). Physiological regulation of sexual behavior in female reptiles. In C. Gans & D. Crews (Eds.), Hormones, brain, and behavior: Biology of the reptilia physiology (Vol. 18, pp. 24–69), Physiology E. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  169. Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: Day-specific estimates from a prospective study. British Medical Journal, 321, 1259–1262.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  170. Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Wilson, M., & Mesnick, S. L. (1997). An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In P.A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 505–511). New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  172. Wrangham, R. W. (1993). The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Human nature: An interdisciplinary biosocial perspective, 4, 47–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options