Advertisement

Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position for Carcinoma of the Esophagus

  • C. PalaniveluEmail author
  • Palanivelu Praveen Raj
  • Palanisami Senthilnathan
  • R. Parthasarathi
Chapter

Abstract

In open surgery for intrathoracic esophageal tumors/carcinoma, transhiatal esophagectomy was used for tumors in the lower third of the esophagus and a transthoracoscopic McKeown three-hole/three-field approach with cervical anastomosis was used for tumors in the middle and upper thirds of the esophagus. Initially, we followed the same principles when using a laparoscopic approach. Our standard approach for thoracoscopic esophagectomies is with the patient in the prone position.

The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer was first reported by Cushieri et al. in 1992. Subsequently, no other groups reported using this approach. Many esophageal surgeons have been interested in performing minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. All of the cases reported in the literature reported using video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) esophagectomy with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. After 10 years, this author’s report of 130 cases using the approach with the patient in the prone position created great enthusiasm among many surgeons across the world, including those in Japan, Korea, and Europe. The author’s video using this approach received best technique awards in various congresses such as the American College of Surgeons (ACS) in 2005, the 16th European Congress at Stockholm, and the 10th World Congress of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. The author performed a live thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy on a patient in the prone position for esophageal cancer during the Hong Kong Asia Pacific Congress (ELSA) in 2005, which created great enthusiasm among the Asian group.

Keywords

Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy Carcinoma of the esophagus Esophageal cancer Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy in the semiprone position 

Supplementary material

Video 15.1

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position (MP4 86492 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;76:643–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McKeown KC. Total three-stage oesophaectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 1976;63:259.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):486–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathy R. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracic mobilisation of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position – experience of 130 cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(1):7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cushier A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7–11.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McAnena OJ, Rogers J, Williams NS. Right thoracoscopically assisted oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 1994;81:236–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gossot D, Cattan P, Fritsch S, Halimi B, Sarfati E, Celerier M. Can the morbidity of esophagectomy be reduced by the thoracoscopic approach? Surg Endosc. 1995;9:1113–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robertson GS, Lloyd DM, Wicks AC, Veitch PS. No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83:675–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    PraveenRaj P, Palanivelu C, Parthasarathy R. Video presentation international Award session annual conference of American College of Surgeons, New Orleans; 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palanivelu C, Parthasarthy R, Senthilnathan P. Award session; EAES best video session: 16th annual conference of European Society of Endo Surgeons, Stockholm; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palanivelu C, Best abstract technique session; 10th world congress of International Society for Diseases of Esophagus, Kagoshima; 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hulsher JB, Tijseen JG, Overtop H, et al. Transthoracic verses transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):S2159–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(3):293–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Lemoine PH, et al. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):593–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lam KY, Ma LT, Wong J. Measurement of extend of spread of esophageal carcinoma by serial sectioning. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:124–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alkorki N, Skinner D. Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg. 2001;234:581–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hegan JA, Peters PM, DeMeester TR. Superiority of extended enbloc esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the lower esophagus and cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:850–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, et al. Terminalised semi mechanical side to side technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(3):814–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A, Chino O, Makuuchi H. Thoracosopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:40–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric leak with a side to side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(2):277–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S. A prospective randomised trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for esophageal ca of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg. 1998;175:47–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2965–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, Wakabayashi A. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1533–40. discussion 1540–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2485–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Palanivelu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Palanivelu Praveen Raj
    • 2
  • Palanisami Senthilnathan
    • 2
  • R. Parthasarathi
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Oesophagastric SurgeryGEM Hospital and Research CentreRamanathapuram, CoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Surgical GastroenterologyGEM Hospital and Research CentreCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Division of Advanced Minimally Invasive and GI SurgeryGEM Hospital and Research CentreCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations