Advertisement

Feature Analysis of Uterine Electrohystography Signal Using Dynamic Self-organised Multilayer Network Inspired by the Immune Algorithm

  • Haya Alaskar
  • Abir Jaafar Hussain
  • Fergus Hussain Paul
  • Dhiya Al-Jumeily
  • Hissam Tawfik
  • Hani Hamdan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8588)

Abstract

Premature birth is a significant worldwide problem. There is little understanding why premature births occur or the factors that contribute to its onset. However, it is generally agreed that early detection will help to mitigate the effects preterm birth has on the child and in some cases stop its onset. Research in mathematical modelling and information technology is beginning to produce some interesting results and is a line of enquiry that is likely to prove useful in the early prediction of premature births. This paper proposes a new approach which is based on a neural network architecture called Dynamic Self-organised Multilayer Network Inspired by the Immune Algorithm to analyse uterine electrohystography signals. The signals are pre-processed and features are extracted using the neural network and evaluated using the Mean Squared Error, Mean absolute error, and Normalized Mean Squared Error to rank their ability to discriminate between term and preterm records.

Keywords

Uterine EMG Signals Artificial Immune Systems Time Series Data Features extraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Meng, Q., Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Zhou, J.: Feature analysis of epileptic EEG using nonlinear prediction method. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 2010, pp. 3998–4001 (January 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sunde, C.: Noise Diagnostics of Stationary and Non-Stationary Reactor Processes. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rojas, R.: Neural Networks Introduction, A Systematic, 1st edn., p. 502. Springer (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fele-Zorz, G., Kavsek, G., Novak-Antolic, Z., Jager, F.: A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46(9), 911–922 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forney, E.M., Anderson, C.W.: Classification of EEG during imagined mental tasks by forecasting with Elman Recurrent Neural Networks. In: 2011 Int. Jt. Conf. Neural Networks, pp. 2749–2755 (July 2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Übeyli, E.D., Guler, I.: Statistics over Lyapunov Exponents for Feature Extraction: Electroencephalographic Changes Detection Case. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 625–628 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guler, N., Ubeyli, E., Guler, I.: Recurrent neural networks employing Lyapunov exponents for EEG signals classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 29(3), 506–514 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szkoła, J., Pancerz, K., Warchoł, J.: Recurrent neural networks in computer-based clinical decision support for laryngopathies: An experimental study. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 289398 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Jumeily, D., Hussain, A., Alaskar, H.: Recurrent Neural Networks Inspired by Artificial Immune Algorithm for Time Series Prediction. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Dallas, pp. 2047–2054 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Physionet.org, The Term-Preterm EHG Database (TPEHG DB) (2010), http://www.physionet.org/pn6/tpehgdb/
  11. 11.
    Baghamoradi, S., Naji, M., Aryadoost, H.: Evaluation of cepstral analysis of EHG signals to prediction of preterm labor. In: 18th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–3 (December 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diab, A., Hassan, M., Karlsson, B., Marque, C.: Effect of decimation on the classification rate of nonlinear analysis methods applied to uterine EMG signals. In: IRBM, pp. 12–14 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bazregar, S., Mahdinejad, K.: Preterm Birth Detection Using EMG Signal Processing. Life Sci. J. 10(3), 25–30 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moslem, B., Karlsson, B., Diab, M.O., Khalil, M., Marque, C.: Classification performance of the frequency-related parameters derived from uterine EMG signals. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 2011, pp. 3371–3374 (January 2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassan, M., Terrien, J., Alexandersson, A., Marque, C., Karlsson, B.: Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions. In: 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 2387–2390 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diab, M.O., Moslem, B., Khalil, M., Marque, C.: Classification of uterine EMG signals by using Normalized Wavelet Packet Energy. In: 2012 16th IEEE Mediterr. Electrotech. Conf., pp. 335–338 (March 2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Widyanto, M.R., Nobuhara, H., Kawamoto, K., Hirota, K., Kusumoputro, B.: Improving recognition and generalization capability of back-propagation NN using self-organized network inspired by immune algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 6, 72–84 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen, X., Gao, X.Z., Bie, R.: Artificial Immune Networks:Model and Application. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 1, 168–176 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jordan, M.I.: Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. In: Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 112–127. IEEE Press, Piscataway (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Voegtlin, T.: Recursive self-organizing maps. Neural Netw. 15(8-9), 979–991 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balli, T., Palaniappan, R.: Classification of biological signals using linear and nonlinear features. Physiol. Meas. 31(7), 903–920 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haya Alaskar
    • 1
  • Abir Jaafar Hussain
    • 1
  • Fergus Hussain Paul
    • 1
  • Dhiya Al-Jumeily
    • 1
  • Hissam Tawfik
    • 2
  • Hani Hamdan
    • 3
  1. 1.Liverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Liverpool Hope UniversityUK
  3. 3.Department of Signal Processing & Electronic SystemsSupélecGif sur yvette CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations