Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 2 pp 2045-2048 | Cite as
The Influence of Shape on the Inherent Rolling Potential of Loose Rocks
Abstract
The likelihood that rolling of a rock will be initiated and/or sustained on a slope depends on many factors related to the characteristics of the block and the slope. However, all other things being equal, some solid shapes have a greater potential to roll on a slope than others. This paper describes the results of a systematic laboratory study to determine how shape affects the ease with which rolling of ball-like blocks can be initiated, and its likelihood of being sustained. A simple scheme is presented to group basic shapes with similar rolling tendencies. Through systematic tests with polyhedral blocks on a frictional ramp with a range of inclinations, different basic ball-shaped forms are compared in terms of the ease with which rolling can be initiated, and the likelihood that it will be sustained. The results show that “ball” shapes (with principal dimensions of roughly similar size) are more prone to rolling but that even between shapes within this group, such as cubes and octahedra, the tendency to roll is strongly influenced by other factors including the number of faces. The importance of the starting position on the initiation of rolling is also demonstrated and quantified.
Keywords
Rock rolling Rock shapeNotes
Acknowledgments
The work described here was assisted by several research students. Thanks go to Silvia Ramondi, Alessandro Fossati, Vaughn Haynes and Liangji Zhang.
References
- Agliardi F, Crosta GB (2003) High resolution three-dimensional numerical modelling of rockfalls. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:455–471Google Scholar
- Azzoni A, La Barbera G, Zaninetti A (1995) Analysis and prediction of rockfalls using a mathematical model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 32:709–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Spadari M (2012) Laboratory investigation on high values of restitution coefficients. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(1):35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dorren LKA (2003) A review of rockfall mechanics and modelling approaches. Prog Phys Geogr 27(1):69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fityus S, Giacomini A, Buzzi O (2013) The significance of geology for the morphology of potentially unstable rocks. Eng Geol. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.007. Accessed 24 May 2013
- Giani GP (1992) Rock slope stability analysis. Balkema, Rotterdam p 61Google Scholar
- Glover J, Schweizer A, Christen M, Gerber W, Leine R, Bartelt P (2012) Numerical investigation of the influence of rock shape on rockfall trajectory. Geophys Res Abstr 14:EGU2012-11022-1Google Scholar
- Leine RI, Schweizer A, Christen M, Glover J, Bartelt P, Gerber W (2013) Simulation of rockfall trajectories with consideration of rock shape. Multibody System Dynamics, doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9393-4
- Pfeiffer T, Bowen T (1989) Computer simulation of rockfalls. Bull assoc Eng Geol 26(1):135–145Google Scholar
- Ritchie AM (1963) Evaluation of rockfall and its control. Highway Research Record 17, 13–28. Highway Research Board, Nat. Res. Council. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar