Advertisement

Human Inspiration and Comparison for Monitoring Strategies in a Robotic Convoy Task

  • Silvia Rossi
  • Mariacarla Staffa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8575)

Abstract

Human-robot teamwork requires agents to pay attention to both surrounding environment and teammates. Bandwidth and computational limitations prevent an agent to continuously execute this monitoring activity. Inspired by the behavior of human beings, paying frequent attention to timers while approaching deadlines, we provide robots with general monitoring strategies based on attentional mechanisms, for filtering data and actively focusing only on relevant information. We consider a convoy task (led by a human or a robot) as a benchmark to evaluate and compare human and robot monitoring behaviors.

Keywords

Teamwork Agent Monitoring Attention Human-Robot Interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Breazeal, C., Kidd, C., Thomaz, A., Hoffman, G., Berlin, M.: Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. In: Proc. of Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, pp. 708–713 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodrich, M.A., Schultz, A.C.: Human-robot interaction: A survey. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 203–275 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Collaboration in human-robot teams. In: Proc. of the AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago, IL, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sisbot, E., Alami, R.: A human-aware manipulation planner. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 28, 1045–1057 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaminka, G.A., Tambe, M.: Robust multi-agent teams via socially-attentive monitoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12, 105–147 (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elmaliach, Y., Kaminka, G.A.: Robust multi-robot formations under human supervision and control. Journal of Physical Agents 2, 31–52 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zheng, K., Glas, D., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Supervisory control of multiple social robots for navigation. In: Proc. of 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI, pp. 17–24 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burattini, E., Finzi, A., Rossi, S., Staffa, M.: Monitoring strategies for adaptive periodic control in behavior-based robotic systems. In: Proc. of the 2009 Advanced Technologies for Enhanced Quality of Life, pp. 130–135. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, P., Atkin, M.S., Hansen, E.A.: The interval reduction strategy for monitoring cupcake problems. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp. 82–90. MIT Press (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burattini, E., Rossi, S., Finzi, A., Staffa, M.: Attentional modulation of mutually dependent behaviors. In: Doncieux, S., Girard, B., Guillot, A., Hallam, J., Meyer, J.-A., Mouret, J.-B. (eds.) SAB 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6226, pp. 283–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atkin, M.S., Cohen, P.R.: Monitoring strategies for embedded agents: Experiments and analysis. Adaptive Behavior 4, 125–172 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ceci, S.J., Bronfenbrenner, U.: Don’t forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development 56, 152–164 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Nocera, D., Finzi, A., Rossi, S., Staffa, M.: Attentional action selection using reinforcement learning. In: Ziemke, T., Balkenius, C., Hallam, J. (eds.) SAB 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7426, pp. 371–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Teamwork. Nous, Special Issue on Cognitive Science and AI 25, 487–512 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuniyoshi, Y., Kita, N., Rougeaux, S., Sakane, S., Ishii, M., Kakikua, M.: Cooperation by observation: The framework and basic task patterns. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, vol. 1, pp. 767–774 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Rossi
    • 1
  • Mariacarla Staffa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology D.I.E.T.I.University of Naples - Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations