Advertisement

The ‘Reluctant Hegemon’: Germany in the EU’s Post-Crisis Constellation

  • Christian Schweiger
Chapter

Abstract

The financial crisis and the subsequent sovereign debt crisis in the eurozone has caused a fundamental shift in the EU’s internal power balance. The economic weakness of France and the other two larger Eurozone countries Italy and Spain has pushed Germany as the largest Eurozone member state with the strongest economic performance into a dominant position as agenda-setter. The German chancellor Angela Merkel has been reluctant to accept her country’s new unintended position as a hegemon in the EU. Under her leadership the EU has responded to the crisis by creating a new complex policy framework with multiple levels of responsibility. The new setup poses substantial risks for Germany’s future position in the EU. Germany’s insistence on putting fiscal austerity at the heart of the EU’s emerging post-crisis agenda has alienated many member states, particularly those who face grave social consequences as a result of the crisis. Moreover, the German ambition to push the eurozone towards full political integration risks dividing the EU’s membership base into a core euro insider vs. a periphery outsider group. The strengthening of the supervisory powers of EU’s institutional level has as of yet unpredictable consequences for sovereign national policy-making. This chapter argues that the post-crisis internal setup in the EU poses the substantial risk of long-term political isolation for Germany if its leaders fail to present a broader vision for the future of the EU. At the same time Germany’s good relations with countries in Central and Eastern Europe present an opportunity for the country to form new leadership alliances and to counter renewed fears of a ‘German Europe’.

Keywords

Member State Grand Coalition Sovereign Debt Crisis Growth Pact Constitutional Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, J. J. (1997). Hard interests, soft power and Germany’s changing role in Europe. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), Tamed power: Germany in Europe (pp. 80–107). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, Martin (2004) Controversial Commissioner. European Voice, 9 September. http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/controversial-commissioner/50594.aspx. Accessed 13 January 2014.
  3. Bensaid, D. (1998). How left is left in Europe? New Centre, Third Way’, Le Monde Diplomatique. http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/03bensaid. Accessed 7 January 2014.
  4. Blair, T. (1995). Speech to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 5 April.Google Scholar
  5. Blair, T. (2000) Speech at the Polish Stock Exchange, Warsaw, 6 October. http://euobserver.com/news/2450. Accessed 11 January 2014.
  6. Blair, T. (2001). Speech at the SPD party conference, Nuremberg, 20 November.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, G. (2010). Beyond the crash: Overcoming the first crisis of globalisation. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Brzezinski, Z. (2013). Keynote address at the Bratislava Global Security Forum, 25 April. http://www.globsec.org/globsec2013/highlights-news/globsec-2012-summary3/. Accessed 15 January 2014.
  9. Bulmer, S. (1997). Shaping the rules? The constitutive policies of the European Union and German Power. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), Tamed power: Germany in Europe (pp. 49–79). Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar
  10. Bulmer, S., Jeffery, C., & Paterson, W. E. (2000). Germany’s European diplomacy: Shaping the regional milieu. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bulmer, S., & Paterson, W. E. (2013). Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strength and political constraints’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1387–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2009). Leitsätze zum Urteil des Zweiten Senats vom 30. Juni 2009. Karlsruhe: BVG.Google Scholar
  13. Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2011). Beschluss vom 27 Oktober 2 BvE 8/11. Karlsruhe: BVG.Google Scholar
  14. Busch, A. (2005). Shock-absorbers under stress: Parapublic Institutions and the double Challenges of German Unification and European Integration. In S. Green & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), Governance in contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Busch, A., & Goldbach, R. (2011). Die Stellung Deutschlands in der Weltwirtschaft. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (Eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik (2nd ed., pp. 275–295). VS Verlag: Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  16. Central and Eastern Europe Development Institute (2014) Germany-Central and Eastern Europe: The Old Continent’s New Economic Core? Warsaw: CEED Bulletin 13 January. http://ceedinstitute.org/news#art-1771. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  17. Cole, A. (2001). Franco–German relations. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Dyson, K. (2012). Economic and monetary disunion? In J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European disunion: Between sovereignty and solidarity (pp. 181–199). Palgrave MacMillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  19. European Communities (2004) Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok (November). http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/fp6-evidence-base/evaluation_studies_and_reports/evaluation_studies_and_reports_2004/the_lisbon_strate
  20. European Council (2011) Conclusions of the Heads of State or Government of the Euro Area. 11 March. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/119810.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  21. European Council (2012) Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union. http://europeancouncil.europa.eu/media/639235/st00tscg26_en12.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  22. European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A strategy for smart sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 14 December 2014.
  23. Eurostat (2013b) Unemployment rate by sex. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tsdec450&plugin=1. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  24. Fischer, J. (2000). Speech at the Belgian parliament, Brussels. 14 November 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Froehly, J.-P. (2002). Nizza und wie geht es weiter? Paris, Berlin und das politische Europa. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.Google Scholar
  26. Gebert, K., & Guérot, U. (2012). Why Poland is the New France for Germany. European Council on Foreign Relations Commentary, 19 October. http://ecfr.eu/content/entry/commentary_why_poland_is_the_new_france_for_germany. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  27. Giddens, A. (2006). A social model for Europe. In A. Giddens, P. Diamond, & R. Liddle (Eds.), Global Europe, Social Europe (pp. 14–36). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gould, P. (1998). The unfinished revolution: How the modernisers saved the labour party. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  29. Grabbe H (2001) ‘What comes after Nice’, CER Policy Brief, 20 February. London: Centre for European Reform. http://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2012/policybrief_nicetreaty-5750.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2014.
  30. Grabbe, H. & Münchau W. (2002). Germany and Britain: an alliance of necessity. London: Centre for European Reform. http://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/p289_germany_britain-1932.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2014.
  31. Guérin-Sendelbach, V., & Schild, J. (2002). French perceptions of Germany’s role in the EU and Europe. In M. Jopp, H. Schneider, & U. Schmalz (Eds.), Germany’s European Policy: Perceptions in key Partner countries (pp. 33–56). Europa Union: Bonn.Google Scholar
  32. Guérot, U., & Klau, T. (2012). After Merkozy: How France and Germany can make Europe work. London: Council on Foreign Relations. http://ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR56_FRANCE_GERMANY_BRIEF_AW.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  33. Guérot, U., Stark, H., & Defarges, P. M. (1998). Währungsunion, Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik und EU-Reform im Spannungsfeld der deutsch-französischen Beziehungen. In W. Weidenfeld (Ed.), Deutsche Europapolitik: Optionen wirksamer Interessenvertretung (pp. 130–165). Europa Union: Gütersloh.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, B., Eaglesham, J., Benoit B. (2008). Brown and Sarkozy put heat on Merkel. 6 December 2008. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1c1cd578-c33b-11dd-a5ae-000077b07658.html?siteedition=uk. Accessed on 14 January 2014.
  35. Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (2012). The political economy of European Welfare Capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  36. Heering, W. W. (2007). Monetary targeting by the German Bundesbank: Some reflections on conceptual issues. In J. Hölscher (Ed.), Germany’s economic performance: From unification to Euroization (pp. 66–100). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  37. Hübner, K. (2012). German crisis management and leadership—from ignorance to procrastination to action. Asia Europe Journal, 9(2–4), 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hyde-Price, A. (2000). Germany and European Order: Enlarging NATO and the EU. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jospin, L. (2001). The future of an Enlarged Europe. Speech at the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Paris. 28 May 2001. http://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2005/1/17/642dc4c9-b224-4ea7-a77b-7e4d894b3077/publishable_en.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2014.
  40. Kaltenthaler, K. (1997). Institutional sources of German Monetary Policy Dynamics. Journal of Public Policy, 17(3), 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kemmerling, A., & Bruttel, O. (2006). “New Politics” in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state. West European Politics, 29(1), 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lapavitsas, C., et al. (Eds.). (2012). Crisis in the Eurozone. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Le Gloannec, A.-M. (2001). Germany’s power and the weakening of states in a globalised world: Deconstructing a paradox. In D. Webber (Ed.), New Europe, New Germany, Old Foreign Policy? German Foreign Policy Since Unification (pp. 117–135). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  44. Lohmann, S. (1998). Federalism and Central Bank Independence: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–92. World Politics, 50(3), 401–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacDonald, E. (2005). The Barroso Drama: The Blair necessities. European Constitutional Law Review, 1(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCann, D. (2010). The Political Economy of the European Union. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  47. Merkel, A. (2013). Wir sitzen in einem Boot. DER SPIEGEL 23, 3 June: 29–31.Google Scholar
  48. Merkel, A., & Sarkozy, N. (2011). Joint press conference at the Franco-German summit on economic convergence, Paris, 16 August. http://www.ambafrance-uk.org/French-and-German-leaders-post. Accessed 15 January 2014.
  49. Moss, B. H. (1998). Economic and Monetary Union and the Social Divide in France. Contemporary European History, 7(2), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G. (2011). Deutschlands bilaterale Beziehungen im Rahmen der EU. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (Eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik (2nd ed., pp. 605–629). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. O’Donnel, C. M., & Whitman, R. G. (2007). European Policy under Gordon Brown: Perspectives on a Future Prime Minister. International Affairs, 83(2), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paterson, W. E. (2011) The reluctant Hegemon? Germany moves centre stage in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(Annual Review), 55–75.Google Scholar
  53. Paterson, W. E. (2012). A contested Franco-German Duumvirate. In J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European disunion: Between sovereignty and solidarity (pp. 235–251). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  54. Sarkozy, N. & Merkel, A. (2008) Joint Press Conference at the 10 th Franco-German Council of Ministers. Paris, 24 November. http://www.ambafrance-uk.org/10th-franco-german-council-of. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  55. Sauga, M. (2013). Der einsame Europa-Kämpfer Wolfgang Schäuble. DER SPIEGEL 29, 15 July: 34–37.Google Scholar
  56. Scharpf, F. W. (2005). No exit from the joint decision trap? Can German Federalism Reform Itself? Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Working Paper 05/8.Google Scholar
  57. Schröder, G. (1998a). Und weil wir unser Land verbessern: 26 Briefe für ein modernes Deutschland. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
  58. Schröder, G (1998b) Jetzt sind die Pragmatiker die Visionäre. DIE ZEIT (29). http://www.zeit.de/1998/29/Schroeder_Jetzt_sind_die_Pragmatiker_die_Visionaere/seite-2. Accessed 10 January 2014.
  59. Schröder, G. (2003). Für eine kooperative Weltordnung. Internationale Politik, 9, 13–18.Google Scholar
  60. Schweiger, C. (2013). The EU’s multiple cores and the CEEs: A threat or an opportunity? Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe, 11(3), 27–46.Google Scholar
  61. Sikorski, R. (2011). Poland and the future of the European Union. Address at the German Council of Foreign Relations, Berlin, 28 November. http://www.mfa.gov.pl/resource/33ce6061-ec12-4da1-a145-01e2995c6302:JCR. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  62. Sinn, H.-W. (2004). Ist Deutschland noch zu retten? München: Econ.Google Scholar
  63. Streeck, W. (2009). Endgame? The fiscal crisis of the German State. In A. Miskimmon, W. E. Paterson, & J. Sloam (Eds.), Germany’s gathering crisis: The 2005 Federal election and the grand coalition (pp. 38–63). Palgrave MacMillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  64. Stryjek, J. (2013). Economic security aspects of the potential EMU membership of Poland. Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe, 11(3), 47–64.Google Scholar
  65. Stuart, G. (2003). The making of Europe’s constitution. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  66. Traynor, I., Gow, D., & Watt, N. (2008). European leaders join Brown in push for crisis summit. The Guardian 16 October. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/oct/16/europe-economy. Accessed 14 January 2014.
  67. Webber, D. (1999). Conclusion. In D. Webber (Ed.), The Franco-German relationship in the European Union (pp. 167–182). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Wittlinger, R. (2010). German National Identity in the 21st Century: A different republic after all? Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Young, B., & Semmler, W. (2011). The European sovereign debt crisis: Is Germany to blame? German Politics and Society, 29(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zohlnhöfer, R. (2011). Between a rock and a hard place: The grand coalition’s response to the economic crisis. German Politics, 20(2), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics, School of Government and International AffairsDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations