Controversies in Education pp 105-112

Part of the Policy Implications of Research in Education book series (PIRE, volume 3) | Cite as

Building New Social Movements: The Politics of Responsibility and Accountability in School-Community Relationships

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides both a response to Reid’s chapter “Public diversity; private disadvantage: schooling and ethnicity” and an extension of the discussion to explore the relationship between schools and the communities they serve. Particularly focused on schools in low socio-economic contexts, the chapter will reflect on issues of diversity and disadvantage by drawing on data from a research project investigating the importance of teachers researching their communities. Drawing on this data and the heretical discussions presented by Reid, this chapter will challenge generally accepted notions of parental involvement in schools, schools’ understandings of, and attitudes towards the communities they serve, and the extent to which policies and movements, such as school choice, shape current school-community relationships.

References

  1. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Sydney: Pearson Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. (2010). New class inequalities in education. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(3/4).Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sheringon, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1993). Schools and social justice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W., White, V. M., & Johnston, K. M. (1992). An experiment in justice: The disadvantaged schools program and the question of poverty, 1974–1990. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(4), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cullen, S. (2012). Gillard delivers school funding plan. ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-03/government-delivers-response-to-gonski-review/4239956. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  10. DEEWR. (n.d.). Improving teacher quality. http://www.smarterschools.gov.au/nationalpartnerships/Pages/ImprovingTeacherQuality.aspx. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  11. Demerath, P., Lynch, J., Milner, R., Peters, A., & Davidson, M. (2010). Decoding success: A middle-class logic of individual advancement in a US suburb and high school. Teachers College Record, 112(12), 2935–2987.Google Scholar
  12. Freebody, P., Freebody, K. & Maney, B. (2011a). Teachers researching communities: Final report. Report prepared for NSW Department of Education and Communities. http://www.lowsesschools.nsw.edu.au/DetailViewT.aspx?id=26. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  13. Freebody, K., Freebody, P., & Maney, B. (2011b). Schools relating to communities: Times of diversity, volatility and rapid change. In D. Bottrell & S. Goodwin (Eds.), Schools, communities and social inclusion. South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Garrett, P. (2011). Speech to 7th National Catholic Education Convention, 23 September, 2011. http://ministers.deewr.gov.au/garrett/7th-national-catholic-education-convention. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  15. Gonski, A. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? ACER Research conference Melbourne. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/RC2003_Hattie_TeachersMakeADifference.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  17. Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Krumin-Strauss, K. (2011). How are notions of SES and disadvantage represented in education policy? An analysis of the Priority Schools Programs and Smarter Schools National Partnerships. Honours thesis, The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  19. Lamb, S. & Teese, R. (2005). Equity programs in government schools in NSW: A review. The University of Melbourne, Centre for Post Compulsory Education and Life-long Learning.Google Scholar
  20. Masters, G. N., & Forster, M. (1997). Mapping literacy achievement results of the 1996 national school English literacy survey. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. ACT.Google Scholar
  21. NSW National Partnerships. (n.d.). Improving reacher quality. http://www.nationalpartnerships.nsw.edu.au/improving-teacher-quality.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.
  22. Sheehan, P. (2012, April 9). Parents the X-factor in education rankings. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/parents-the-xfactor-in-education-rankings-20120408-1wj7d.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations