Controversies in Education pp 1-12

Part of the Policy Implications of Research in Education book series (PIRE, volume 3) | Cite as

Introduction: Heresy and Orthodoxy in Contemporary Schooling: Australian Educational Policy and Global Neoliberal Reform

Chapter

Abstract

This book grew out of a colloquium series, hosted by the University of Sydney, in which leading scholars and researchers were invited to name what they took to be the deep, potentially lethal flaws at the heart of contemporary schooling practice and policy. They were invited to identify and challenge prevailing orthodoxies and to voice their potentially ‘heretical’ views about education in the twenty-first century. The chapters in this volume arise from an Australian schooling and policy context that has international resonance. Australia provides, we argue, a good case study of the kinds of globally popular reform strategies that have been described by the celebrity Finnish educator, Pasi Sahlberg as ‘GERM’—the Global Education Reform Movement: standardisation; a focus on core curriculum subjects at the expense of areas such as creative arts; risk-avoidance; corporate management models, and test-based accountancy policies. In this chapter we introduce key elements of our authors’ critiques of contemporary education policy and practice and consider the purpose of critique (or ‘heresy’), and the practical impact, or otherwise, of this kind of academic work at a time of uncertainty and change for university research and teaching in the field of education.

References

  1. Australian Broadcasting Commission. (1974). Heresies. Sydney: Australian Broadcasting Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: AITSL.Google Scholar
  3. Bloomfield, D. (2009). Working within and against neoliberal accreditation agendas: Opportunities for professional experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridges, D. (Ed.). (1982). Helen Palmer’s outlook. Sydney: Helen Palmer Memorial Committee.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. (2012). Webb, Norman Charles (1925–1985), Australian dictionary of biography. Canberra: National Centre of Biography, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, C., & Proctor, H. (2014). A history of Australian schooling. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1988). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gonski, D. (Chair). (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, B., Weidmann, B., & Farmer, J. (2013). The myth of markets in school education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Larner, W. (2005). Neoliberalism in (regional) theory and practice: The stronger communities action fund in New Zealand. Geographical Research, 43(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marginson, S. (1997). Educating Australia: Government, economy and citizen since 1960. Cambridge/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meagher, G., & Goodwin, S. (Eds.). (2014). Markets, rights and power in Australian social policy. Sydney: University of Sydney Press.Google Scholar
  17. Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 66). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Palmer, H. (1974). Education is good so more education is better. In ABC (Eds.), Heresies (pp. 117–121).Google Scholar
  19. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Proctor
    • 1
  • Peter Freebody
    • 1
  • Patrick Brownlee
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations