Meta-learning: Can It Be Suitable to Automatise the KDD Process for the Educational Domain?

  • Marta Zorrilla
  • Diego García-Saiz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8537)

Abstract

The use of e-learning platforms is practically generalised in all educational levels. Even more, virtual teaching is currently acquiring a great relevance never seen before. The information that these systems record is a wealthy source of information that once it is suitably analised, allows both, instructors and academic authorities to make more informed decisions. But, these individuals are not expert in data mining techniques, therefore they require tools which automatise the KDD process and, the same time, hide its complexity. In this paper, we show how meta-learning can be a suitable alternative for selecting the algorithm to be used in the KDD process, which will later be wrapped and deployed as a web service, making it easily accessible to the educational community. Our case study focuses on the student performance prediction from the activity performed by the students in courses hosted in Moodle platform.

Keywords

Meta-learning classification predicting student performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelmessih, S.D., Shafait, F., Reif, M., Goldstein, M.: Landmarking for meta-learning using rapidminer. In: RapidMiner Community Meeting and Conference (2010), http://madm.dfki.de/publication&pubid=4948
  2. 2.
    Romero, C., Olmo, J.L., Ventura, S.: A meta-learning approach for recommending a subset of white-box classification algorithms for Moodle datasets. In: Proc. 6th Int. Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 268–271 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Souza, B.F., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Soares, C.: Empirical evaluation of ranking prediction methods for gene expression data classification. In: Kuri-Morales, A., Simari, G.R. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6433, pp. 194–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    García-Saiz, D., Palazuelos, C., Zorrilla, M.: Data Mining and Social Network Analysis in the Educational Field: An Application for Non-expert Users. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Educational Data Mining. SCI, vol. 524, pp. 411–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: The kdd process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data. Commun. ACM 39(11), 27–34 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    García-Saiz, D., Zorrilla, M.: A promising classification method for predicting distance students’ performance. In: Yacef, K., Zaïane, O.R., Hershkovitz, A., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J.C. (eds.) EDM, pp. 206–207 (2012), www.educationaldatamining.org
  7. 7.
    Hilario, M., Kalousis, A.: Building algorithm profiles for prior model selection in knowledge discovery systems. Engineering Intelligent Systems 8, 956–961 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho, T.K.: Geometrical complexity of classification problems. CoRR cs.CV/0402020 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jankowski, N., Duch, W., Grąbczewski, K. (eds.): Meta-Learning in Computational Intelligence. SCI, vol. 358. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalousis, A., Hilario, M.: Model selection via meta-learning: a comparative study. In: Proc. 12th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 406–413 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kordík, P., Cerný, J.: On performance of meta-learning templates on different datasets. In: IJCNN, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feng, M., Bienkowski, M., Means, B.: Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Tech. rep., U. S. Department of Education (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Molina, M.M., Luna, J.M., Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Meta-learning approach for automatic parameter tuning: A case study with educational datasets. In: Proc. 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 180–183 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peng, Y.H., Flach, P.A., Soares, C., Brazdil, P.B.: Improved dataset characterisation for meta-learning. In: Lange, S., Satoh, K., Smith, C.H. (eds.) DS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2534, pp. 141–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 3(1), 12–27 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Segrera, S., Pinho, J., Moreno, M.N.: Information-theoretic measures for meta-learning. In: Corchado, E., Abraham, A., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) HAIS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5271, pp. 458–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vilalta, R., Drissi, Y.: A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 18, 77–95 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Zorrilla
    • 1
  • Diego García-Saiz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and ElectronicsUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain

Personalised recommendations