Second Generation Applications of Other Types of Current Conveyors in Realizing Synthetic Impedances

  • Raj Senani
  • D. R. Bhaskar
  • A. K. Singh
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Chosen from a vast amount of literature in the area of impedance simulation using CCs, a number of novel synthetic impedance circuits have been described using the new variants of CCs (such as DOCCII, DVCC, CCIII, DXCCII, MICCII, DDCC and FDCCII etc.) for realizing both grounded and floating forms of inductors and other related elements, which possess a number of interesting features.

Keywords

Passive Component Passive Element Current Conveyor Input Admittance Parasitic Impedance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Fabre A, Saaid O (1993) Novel translinear impedance convertor and band pass filter applications. Electron Lett 29:746–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abuelma’atti MT (1998) Comment: floating inductance simulation based on current conveyors. Electron Lett 34:1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ananda Mohan PV (2005) Floating capacitance simulation using current conveyors. J Circ Syst Comput 14:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soliman AM (2010) New CCII and ICCII based realizations of L-C and L-R mutators. Circ Syst Sig Process 29:1181–1191CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metin B (2011) Supplementary inductance simulator topologies employing single DXCCII. Radioengineering 20:614–618Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu SI, Yang CY (1996) Higher-order immittance function synthesis using CCIIIs. Electron Lett 32:2295–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ananda Mohan PV (1998) Grounded capacitor based grounded and floating inductance simulation using current conveyors. Electron Lett 34:1037–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sedef H, Acar C (2000) A new floating FDNR circuit using differential voltage current conveyors. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 54:297–301Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuntman H, Gulsoy M, Cicekoglu O (2000) Actively-simulated grounded lossy inductors using third generation current conveyors. Microelectron J 31:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang HY, Lee CT (2000) Systematic synthesis of R-L and C-D immittances using single CCIII. Int J Electron 87:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minaei S (2003) A new high performance CMOS third generation current conveyor (CCIII) and its application. Electr. Engineering J 85:147–153Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minaei S, Cicekoglu O, Kuntman H, Turkoz S (2002) Electronically tunable, active only floating inductance simulation. Int J Electron 89:905–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan IA, Zaidi MH (2003) A novel ideal floating inductor using translinear conveyors. Active Passiv Electron Comp 26:87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Incekaraoglu M, Cam U (2005) Realization of series and parallel R-L and C-d Impedances using single differential voltage current conveyor. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 43:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gift SJG (2004) New simulated inductor using operational conveyors. Int J Electron 91:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeki A, Toker A (2005) DXCCII-based tunable gyrator. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 59:59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuce E (2006) Comment on Realization of series and parallel R-L and C-D impedances using single differential voltage current conveyor. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 49:91–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuce E (2006) On the realization of the floating simulators using only grounded passive components. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 49:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuce E, Minaei S, Cicekoglu O (2005) A novel grounded inductor realization using a minimum number of active and passive components. ETRI J 27:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuce E, Cicekoglu O, Minaei S (2006) CCII-based grounded to floating immittance converter and a floating inductance simulator. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 46:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Minaei S, Yuce E, Cicekoglu O (2006) A versatile active circuit for realizing floating inductance, capacitance, FDNR and admittance converter. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 47:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yuce E, Minaei S, Cicekoglu O (2006) Limitations of the simulated inductors based on a single current conveyors. IEEE Trans Circ Syst-I 53:2860–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yuce E, Minaei S (2007) A new active network suitable for realizing ladder filters and transformer simulator. J Circ Syst Comput 16:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minaei S, Yuce E (2008) Realization of tunable active floating inductance simulators. Int J Electron 95:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yuce E (2008) Negative impedance converter with reduced nonideal gain and parasitic impedance effects. IEEE Trans Circ Syst-I 55:276–283MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riewruja V, Petchmaneelumka W (2008) Floating current-controlled resistance converters using OTAs. Int J Electron Commun 62:725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Metin B, Herencsar N, Horng JW (2014) DCCII-based novel lossless grounded inductance simulators with no element matching constrains. Radioeng J 23:532–4538Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horng JW, Hou CL, Chang CM, Yang H, Shyu WT (2009) Higher-order immittance functions using current conveyors. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 61:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sagbas M, Ayten UE, Sedef H, Koksal M (2009) Floating immittance function simulator and its applications. Circ Syst Sig Process 28:55–63CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yuce E, Minaei S (2009) On the realization of simulated inductors with reduced parasitic impedance effects. Circ Syst Sig Process 28:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yuce E, Minaei S (2009) Novel floating simulated inductors with wider operating-frequency ranges. Microelectron J 40:928–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sagbas M, Ayten UE, Sedef H, Koksal M (2009) Electronically tunable floating inductance simulator. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 63:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lahiri A (2009) Comment on ‘Electronically tunable floating inductance simulator’. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 63:878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kacar F, Yesil A (2010) Novel grounded parallel inductances simulators realization using a minimum number of active and passive components. Microelectron J 41:632–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soliman AM (2010) On the realization of floating inductors. Nat Sci 8(5):167–180Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Metin B, Minaei S (2010) Parasitic compensation in CC-I based circuits for reduced power consumption. Analog Integ Circ Sig Process 65:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saad RA, Soliman AM (2010) On the systematic synthesis of CCII-based floating simulators. Int J Circ Theor Appl 38:935–967CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kacar F, Metin B, Kuntman H (2010) A new CMOS dual-X second generation current conveyor (DXCCII) with an FDNR circuit application. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 64:774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Horng JW (2010) Lossless inductance simulation and voltage-mode universal biquadratic filter with one input and five outputs using DVCCs. Analog Integ Circ Sig Process 62:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yuce E (2010) A novel floating simulation topology composed of only grounded passive components. Int J Electron 97:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kacar F (2010) New lossless inductance simulators realization using a minimum active and passive components. Microelectron J 41:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kacar F, Yesil A (2011) FDCCII-based FDNR simulator topologies. Int J Electron 99:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pal K (1989) Modified current conveyors and their applications. Microelectron J 20:37–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Swamy MNS (2011) Mutators, generalized Impedance converters and inverters, and their realization using generalized current conveyors. Circ Syst Sig Process 30:209–232MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Myderrizi I, Minaei S, Yuce E (2011) DXCCII-based grounded inductances simulators and filter applications. Microelectron J 42:1074–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prommee P, Somdunyakanok M (2011) CMOS-based current-controlled DDCC and its applications to capacitance multiplier and universal filter. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 65:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ibrahim MA, Minaei S, Yuce E, Herencsar N, Koton J (2012) Lossy/lossless floating/grounded inductance simulation using one DDCC. Radioengineering 21:3–10Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sagbas M, Ayten UE, Sedef H, Koksal M (2012) Reply to comment on ‘Electronically tunable floating inductance simulator’. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 66:86–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Herencsar N, Lahiri A, Koton J, Vrba K, Metin B (2012) Realization of resistorless lossless positive and negative grounded inductor simulators using single ZC-CCCITA. Radioengineering 21:264–272Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Metin B (2012) Canonical inductor simulators with grounded capacitors using DCCII. Int J Electron 99:1027–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sagbas M (2014) Electronically tunable mutually coupled circuit using only two active components. Int J Electron 101:364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Prasad D, Ahmad J (2014) New electronically-controllable lossless synthetic floating inductance circuit using single VDCC. Circ Syst 5:13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kacar F, Yesil A, Minaei S, Kuntman H (2014) Positive/negative lossy/lossless grounded inductance simulators employing single VDCC and only two passive elements. Int J Electron Commun (AEU) 68:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang Z (1990) Novel voltage-controlled grounded resistor. Electron Lett 26:1711–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Piovaccari A (1995) CMOS integrated third generation current conveyor. Electron Lett 31:1228–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zeki A, Toker A, Cicekoglu O (2002) The dual-X current conveyor (DXCCII): a new active device for tunable continuous-time filters. Int J Electron 89:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kacar F, Metin B, Kuntman H (2010) A new dual-X CMOS second generation current conveyor (DXCCII) with a FDNR circuit application. AEU Int J Electron Commun 64:774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Elvan HO, Soliman AM (1997) Novel CMOS differential voltage current conveyor and its applications. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 144:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kacar F, Metin B, Kuntman H, Cicekoglu O (2009) A new high-performance CMOS fully differential second-generation current conveyor with application example of biquad filter realization. Int J Electron 97:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Prommee P, Angkeaw K, Somdunyakanok M, Dejhan K (2009) CMOS-based near zero-offset multiple input max-min circuits and its applications. Analog Integ Circ Sig Process 61:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chiu W, Liu SI, Tsao HW, Chen JJ (1996) CMOS differential difference current conveyor and their applications. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 143:91–96CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Adams KM, Deprettere E (1974) On the realization of gyrators by nullors and resistors. Int J Circ Theor Appl 2:287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raj Senani
    • 1
  • D. R. Bhaskar
    • 2
  • A. K. Singh
    • 3
  1. 1.Electronics and Communication EngineeringNetaji Subhas Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Electronics and Communication EngineeringJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sharda UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations