Advertisement

Accessibility of E-Commerce Websites for Vision-Impaired Persons

  • Roopa Bose
  • Helmut Jürgensen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8547)

Abstract

We report the results of a detailed analysis of the problems encountered by blind or vision-impaired persons when accessing web sites which use technologies like, for example, flash animation, JavaScript, HTML 5. We also examine typical accessibility problems found in e-commerce websites, especially in on-line shopping. We check our findings against the WCAG 2.0 accessibility guidelines and provide detailed recommendations for changes or additions to these guidelines.

Keywords

Web Accessibility WCAG Screen Readers E-Commerce Website Accessibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bigham, J.P., Prince, C.M.: Webanywhere: A Screen Reader On-the-go. In: Pontelli, E., Trewin, S. (eds.) ASSETS 2007, pp. 225–226. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bose, R.: Accessibility of e-commerce websites for vision-impaired persons. MSc Thesis, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiousemoglou, M., Jürgensen, H.: Setting the table for the blind. In: PETRA 2011, 8 p. ACM Press, New York (2011), Published on CDGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennel, A., Perrochon, L., Darvishi, A.: WAB: World Wide Web access for blind and visually impaired computer users. SIGCAPH Newsletter 55, 10–15 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    King, A., Evans, G., Blenkhorn, P.: Webbie: A browser for visually impaired people. In: Proc. 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, pp. 35–44 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., Malarkey, C.: What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction 22(3), 247–269 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F.: Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3(1), 57–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leuthold, S., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K.: Beyond web content accessibility guidelines: Design of enhanced text user interfaces for blind internet users. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 66(4), 257–270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miyashita, H., Sato, D., Takagi, H., Asakawa, C.: Making Multimedia Content Accessible for Screen Reader Users. In: Harper, S., Yesilada, Y. (eds.) Internat. Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A 2007, pp. 126–127. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Power, C., Jürgensen, H.: Accessible presentation of information for people with visual disabilities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9(2), 97–119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raman, T.V., Chen, C.L., Mazzoni, D., Shearer, R., Gharpure, C., DeBoer, J., Tseng, D.: ChromeVox: A Screen Reader Built Using Web Technology. Google Inc. (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rotard, M., Taras, C., Ertl, T.: Tactile web browsing for blind people. Multimed. Tools Appl. 37(1), 53–69 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schiewe, M., Köhlmann, W., Nadig, O., Weber, G.: What you feel is what you get: Mapping GUIs on planar tactile displays. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 564–573. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spiliotopoulos, D., Xydas, G., Kouroupetroglou, G., Argyropoulos, V.: Experimentation on Spoken Format of Tables in Auditory User Interfaces. In: Smith, M.J., et al. (eds.) 11th HCI International, pp. 22–27. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sullivan, T., Matson, R.: Barriers to Use: Usability and Content Accessibility on the Web’s Most Popular Sites. In: Thomas, J. (ed.) ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 139–144. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Völkel, T., Weber, G., Baumann, U.: Tactile graphics revised: The novel BrailleDis 9000 pin-matrix device with multitouch input. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 835–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview (October 2012), http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php
  19. 19.
    WebAIM: Visual Disabilities, Blindness. Web Accessibilit. In: Mind (August 2013), http://webaim.org/articles/visual/blind
  20. 20.
    WebAIM: Survey of Preferences of Screen Readers Users. Web Accessibility in Mind (January 2009), http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
  21. 21.
    WebAIM: Screen Reader User Survey 4 Results. WebAIM: Web Accessibility in Mind (May 2012), http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4
  22. 22.
    WebAIM: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Web Accessibility in Mind (August 2013), http://webaim.org/standards/wcag
  23. 23.
    Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., Goble, C., Hussein, S.: Rendering Tables in Audio: The Interaction of Structure and Reading Styles. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) Proc. ASSETS 2004, pp. 16–23. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roopa Bose
    • 1
  • Helmut Jürgensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations