Many of us believe that human ingenuity can promote the innovations required to face the challenge of demographic pressure. But twentieth century experience has shown that pollution by human beings (through increased population), by manufacturing industries and by agricultural practices have severely damaged the environment, requiring continuous mitigation efforts. And still we are unable to bring an acceptable standard of living to half of the world population.
How to render intensive agriculture and small farming more sustainable? Good governance and innovative science are essential, but we can no longer delay applying the knowledge generated in the last decennia by the plant scientists. Intensive cooperation among agronomists, agro-ecologists and biotechnologists is urgently needed, together with communication to society on the value of applying science to agriculture, to achieve global food security and improved environment.
Why not doubt about the ingenuity of this Homo sapiens sapiens, if he is not able or willing to make birth control acceptable; unable or unwilling to develop an economy with better profit sharing; unable or unwilling to apply science for developing sustainable agriculture and industry.
Smallholder Farmer Global Food Security Human Ingenuity Orphan Crop Urban Food Security
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Bateson P, Peter G, Hanson M (2014) The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. J Physiol 592:2357–2368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bruce T (2011) GM as a route for delivery of sustainable crop protection. J Exp. Botany 63:537–541Google Scholar
Chakraborty S (2013) Migrate or evolve: options for plant pathogens under climate change. Global Change Biol 19:1985–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton MD, Saiki RK, Yadav N et al (1980) T-DNA from Agrobacterium Ti plasmid is in the nuclear-DNA fraction of Crown gall tumor-cells. Proc Natl Acad Sc USA 77:4060–4064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiaensen LJ, Demery L, Kuhl J (2010) The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction-an empirical perspective. J Dev Econ 96:239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva JG (2012) The Economist Conference: feeding the world in 2050, Geneva, 28 February 2012Google Scholar
De Block MB, Vandewiele M et al (1987) Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme. EMBO J 6:2513–2518Google Scholar
Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1978) Homologous DNA sequences in different Ti plasmids are essential for oncogenicity. Nature 275:150–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier JJ, Effenberger A (2012) Agriculture and development: a brief review of the literature. Econ Syst 36:175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond J (1987) The worst mistake in the history of the human race. Discover Magazine, May 1987, pp 64–66Google Scholar
European Academies Science Advisory Council (2013) Planting the future: opportunities and challenges for using crop genetic improvement technologies for sustainable agriculture. http://www.easac.eu. Accessed 10 June 2014
Fuentes I, Stegemann S, Golczyk H et al (2014) Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species. Nature 511:232–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA et al (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100:1730–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero R, Margulis L, Berlanga M (2013) Symbiogenesis: the holobiont as a unit of evolution. Int Microbiol 16:133–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
Heger P, Wiehe T (2014) New tools in the box: an evolutionary synopsis of chromatin insulators. Trends Genet 30:161–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kliebenstein DJ (2014) Orchestration of plant defence systems: genes to populations. Trends Plant Sci 19:250–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Malthus TR (1798) An essay on the principle of population. Oxford World’s Classics reprint, Chapter 1. p 13Google Scholar
Mariani C, De Beuckeleer M, Truettner J et al (1990) Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariani C, Gossele V, De Beuckeleer M et al (1992) A chimaeric ribonuclease-inhibitor gene restores fertility to male sterile plants. Nature 357:384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows DH, Dennis L. Meadows DL et al (1972) Limits to growth. New American Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Massot BR, Gómez-Galera S et al (2013) The contribution of transgenic plants to better health through improved nutrition: opportunities and constraints. Genes Nutr 8:29–41CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
Vaeck M, Reynaerts A, Höfte H et al (1987) Insect resistance in transgenic plants expressing modified Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes. Nature 328:33–37Google Scholar
Van Moorhem M, Lambein F, Leybaert L (2011) Unraveling the mechanism of β-N-oxalyl-α,β -diaminopropanoic acid (β -ODAP) induced excitotoxicity and oxidative stress, relevance for neurolathyrism prevention. Food Chem Toxicol 49:550–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen S, Zougmore R, Wollenberg E et al (2012) Climate change, agriculture and food security: a global partnership to link research and action for low-income agricultural producers and consumers. Curr Opinion Environ Sustain 4:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen I, Van Larebeke N, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1974) Supercoiled circular DNA in crown-gall inducing Agrobacterium strains. J Mol Biol 86:109–127Google Scholar
Zambryski P, Holsters M, Kruger K et al (1980) Tumor DNA structure in plant cells transformed by A. tumefaciens. Science 209:1385–1391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E (2008) Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:723–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar