EndoSnake—A Single-Arm-Multi-Port MIRS System with Flexible Instruments

  • Julien Mintenbeck
  • Christoph Ledermann
  • Ramon Estaña
  • Heinz Wörn
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 302)

Abstract

Recently, the use of robotic assisted systems for minimally invasive surgery has increased. This is due to the precise manipulation and miniaturisation of the used equipment. The systems can be divided into multi-port and single-port robots, both with the aim of trauma reduction but with different approaches. On the one hand there are multiple robots, one with each instrument or camera and on the other hand there are small flexible instruments and only one incision in the abdominal wall. In this paper, a novel robotic system is presented that combines in a hybrid way the prior described characteristics and continues the medical aims of trauma reduction and surgeon comfort. One single lightweight robot with three individual configurable flexible instruments is being researched. Additionally, the modular hardware and software architecture is based on the open-source idea and rapid-manufacturing processes.

Keywords

Tele-robotic Flexible instruments Shape sensing Laparoscopic surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    G. S. Guthart and J. K. Salisbury, “The Intuitive telesurgery system: overview and application”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 618–621Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U. Hagn, R. Konietschke, A. Tobergte, M. Nickl, S. Jörg, B. Kübler, G. Passig, M. Gröger, F. Fröhlich, U. Seibold, “DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery”, International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 5, pp. 183–193, 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Piccigallo, U. Scarfogliero, C. Quaglia, G. Petroni, P. Valdastri, A. Menciassi, P. Dario, “Design of a Novel Bimanual Robotic System for Single-Port Laparoscopy”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 15, pp. 871–878, 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Xu, R.E. Goldman, J. Ding, P.K. Allen, D.L. Fowler, N. Simaan, “System design of an Insertable Robotic Effector Platform for Single Port Access (SPA) Surgery”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5546–5552, 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Ledermann, H. Pauer, O.Weede and H. Wörn, “Simulation Tool for 3D Shape Sensors Based on Fiber Bragg Gratings and Optimization of Measurement Points”, Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronis (RAM), 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Müller, L. Hoffmann, T. Buck and A. Koch, “Fiber Bragg Grating-Based Force-Torque Sensor with Six Degrees of Freedom”, International Journal of Optomechatronics, vol. 3, pp. 201–214, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julien Mintenbeck
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christoph Ledermann
    • 1
  • Ramon Estaña
    • 2
  • Heinz Wörn
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR)–Intelligent Process Control and Robotics (IPR)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.University of Applied Science Karlsruhe (HSKA)Department of Mechanical EngineeringKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations