Advertisement

A Case for Return Preparedness

  • Jean-Pierre Cassarino
Chapter
Part of the Global Migration Issues book series (IOMS, volume 4)

Abstract

Making a case for return preparedness is crucial in realizing that current migration policies have disregarded so far the implications stemming from various levels of return preparedness. It could even be argued that, for having focused exclusively on the securitization of temporary labor migration, many migration countries find themselves with inadequate instruments aimed at supporting the permanent and temporary return of migrants, let alone their reintegration needs. Return preparedness is also, if not above all, an attempt to raise awareness of the evidence that, beyond established paradigms, a lot remains to be done in order to respond concretely to migrants’ rights, including their aspirations for stability and advancement in their lives.

Keywords

European Union Home Country Migrant Worker Destination Country Return Migrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blitz, B., Sales, R., & Marzano, L. (2005). Non-voluntary return? The politics of return to Afghanistan. Political Studies, 53(1), 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassarino, J.-P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253–279.Google Scholar
  3. Cassarino, J.-P. (2013). The drive for securitized temporariness. In Anna Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Circular migration between Europe and its neighbourhood: Choice or necessity? (pp. 22–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Council of Europe. (1987). Third conference of European ministers responsible for migration affairs: Conclusions. MMG-3 (87) 22, 4 June 1987. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  5. Council of Europe. (2008). Human rights implications for voluntary return policies and programmes for irregular migrants. PACE, Motion for a recommendation presented by Mr Østergaard and others, Doc. 11483, 7 January 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe. (2010). Voluntary return programmes: An effective, humane and cost-effective mechanism for re turning irregular migrants. PACE, Resolution 1742, 2010. http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta10/ERES1742.htm. Accessed 20 April 2013.
  7. de Bree, J. (2008). Return migration to Afghanistan: Monitoring the embeddedness of returnees. Nijmegen: Radboud University, CIDIN.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2005). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and the council on common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. COM (2005) 391 final. Brussels: European Communities.Google Scholar
  9. European Council. (2002). Proposal for a return action programme, 14673/02. Brussels: European Communities.Google Scholar
  10. Iredale, R., & Guo, F. (2001). The transforming role of skilled and business returnees: Taiwan, China and Bangladesh. Wollongong: Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies (CAPSTRANS), University of Wollongong. http://www.archive-iussp.org/Brazil2001/s30/S39_04_Iredale.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2013.
  11. Strand, A., et al. (2008). Return with dignity? Return to what? Review of the voluntary return programme to Afghanistan. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Sward, J. (2009). Assisted voluntary return (AVR): An opportunity for development? Briefing note n. 20. Sussex: DRC on Migration, Globalisation & Poverty, Sussex University.Google Scholar
  13. van Houte, M., & de Koning, M. (2008). Towards a better embeddedness? Monitoring assistance to involuntary returning migrants from Western countries. Nijmegen: Radboud University, CIDIN.Google Scholar
  14. Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration: A triple win or a dead end? Geneva: International Labour Organization. http://www.gurn.info/en/discussion-papers/no15-mar11-circular-migration-a-triple-win-or-a-dead-end. Accessed 20 Apr 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced StudiesEuropean University InstituteFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations