Advertisement

Inequality Begins at Home: The Role of Parenting in the Diverging Destinies of Rich and Poor Children

  • Ariel Kalil
Part of the National Symposium on Family Issues book series (NSFI, volume 5)

Abstract

Children face very different chances of getting ahead in life depending on the circumstances of their birth. Parenting and its role in the diverging destinies of rich and poor children are discussed in this chapter. Inequality begins at home. It develops from the myriad differences in the ways advantaged and disadvantaged parents interact with their children. Traditional policy interventions fail to attack the root cause of achievement gaps. To equalize the playing field, governments may need to invest in parents so parents can better invest in their children. Unfortunately, large-scale parenting interventions typically yield modest effect sizes at best and often do not even change children’s skills in the long term. Understanding what motivates parents to invest in their children could have a major impact on the design of policies to reduce inequality in children’s skill development. Insights from the field of behavioral economics can inform this question.

Keywords

Home Literacy Environment Home Learning Environment Childcare Time Advantage Parent Professional Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, Greg Duncan, Susan Mayer, and Rebecca Ryan for comments on this chapter and for numerous discussions that shaped the ideas herein.

References

  1. Aizer, A., & Stroud, L. (2010). Education, medical knowledge and the evolution of disparities in health. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15840. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  2. Altintas, E. (2012). Parentstime with children: Micro and macro perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review, 102, 3357–3376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., & Yin, W. (2006). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 635–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, M., & Dynarski, S. (2011). Inequality in postsecondary education. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Wither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 117–132). New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Spencer Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, A., Piotrkowski, C., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1998). The effects of the Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) on children’s school performance at the end of the program and one year later. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 571–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belley, P., & Lochner, L. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. Journal of Human Capital, 1, 37–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth, C., Clarke-Stewart, K., Vandell, D., McCartney, K., & Owen, M. (2002). Child-care usage and mother—infant ‘quality time’. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkam, D., Ready, D., Lee, V., & LoGerfo, L. (2004). Social-class differences in summer learning between kindergarten and first grade: Model specification and estimation. Sociology of Education, 77, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Human capital policy. In J. J. Heckman, A. B. Krueger, & B. Friedman (Eds.), Inequality in America: What role for human capital policies?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Charness, G., & Gneezi, U. (2009). Incentives to exercise. Econometrica, 77, 909–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D., & Yagan, D. (2011). How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project STAR. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1593–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chin, T., & Phillips, M. (2004). Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children’s agency, and the summer activity gap. Sociology of Education, 77, 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  15. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood intervention programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deming, D. (2009). Early childhood intervention and life-cycle skill development: Evidence from Head Start. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 111–134.Google Scholar
  18. Dickinson, O. K., & Tabors, P. O. (Eds.). (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  19. Downey, D., von Hippel, P., & Broh, B. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, G., Kalil, A., Mayer, S., Tepper, R., & Payne, M. R. (2005). The apple does not fall far from the tree. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis & M. Osborne Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (pp. 23–79). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Duncan, G., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. (2013, April). Increasing inequality in parent incomes and childrens completed schooling: Correlation or causation? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, G., & Magnuson, K. (2005). Test score gaps: The contributions of family economic and social conditions. The Future of Children, 15, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan, G., & Magnuson, K. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 47–69). New York: Russell Sage and Spencer Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Duncan, G., Magnuson, K., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. (2012). The importance of early childhood poverty. Social Indicators Research, 108, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan, G., Ziol-Guest, K., & Kalil, A. (2010). Early childhood poverty and adult attainment, behavior, and health. Child Development, 81, 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2004). Support in parenting: Values and consensus concerning who to turn to. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 623–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Esping-Andersen, G. (2004). Unequal opportunities and the mechanisms of social inheritance. In M. Corak (Ed.), Generational income mobility in North America and Europe (pp. 289–314). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furstenberg, F. (2011). The challenges of finding causal links between family educational practices and schooling outcomes. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 465–482). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Gelber, A. & Isen, A. (2011). Childrens schooling and parentsinvestment in children: Evidence from the Head Start Impact Study. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 17704. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  31. Gomby, D., Larson, C., Lewit, E., & Behrman, R. (1993). Home visiting: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 3, 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guryan, J., Hurst, E., & Kearney, M. (2008). Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.Google Scholar
  34. Heckman, J. (2011). The American family in black and white: A post-racial strategy for improving skills to promote equality. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16841. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  35. Hofferth, S., & Sandberg, J. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsin, A. (2009). Parent’s time with children: Does time matter for children’s cognitive achievement? In J. Robinson (Ed.), Social indicator research: Time use and qualities of life (pp. 123–126). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Hurst, E. (2010, Spring). Comments and discussion. Brookings papers on economic activity (pp. 177–184). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  38. Huston, A., & Rosenkrantz Aronson, S. (2005). Mothers’ time with infant and time in employment as predictors of mother-child relationships and children’s early development. Child Development, 76, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Isaacs, J., Sawhill, I., & Haskins, R. (2008). Getting ahead or losing ground: Economic mobility in America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  40. Kalil, A., Ryan, R., & Corey, M. (2012). Diverging destinies: Maternal education and the developmental gradient in time with children. Demography, 49, 1361–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral economics and the psychology of incentives. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klebanov, P., Brooks-Gunn, J., McCarton, C., & McCormick, M. C. (1998). The contribution of neighborhood and family income to developmental test scores over the first three years of life. Child Development, 69, 1420–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knudsen, E., Heckman, J. J., Cameron, J., & Shonkoff, J. (2006). Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 10155–10162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kornrich, S., & Furstenberg, F. (2013). Investing in children: Changes in spending on children, 1972 to 2007. Demography, 50, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Love, J., Kisker, E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 885–901.Google Scholar
  48. Magnuson, K., & Waldfogel, J. (2008). Steady gains and stalled progress: Inequality and the black-white test score gap. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 30, 976–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milkman, K., Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. (2011). Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10415–10420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Decision making and policy in the context of poverty. In E. Shafir (Ed.), Behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 281–300). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Father’s and mother’s parenting behavior and beliefs as predictors of children’s social adjustment in the transition to school. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 628–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nickerson, D., & Rogers, T. (2010). Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychological Science, 194–199.Google Scholar
  54. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background—equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II) http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en.
  55. Olds, D., Henderson, C., & Kitzman, H. (1994). Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics, 93, 89–98.Google Scholar
  56. Phillips, M. (2011). Parenting, time use, and disparities in academic outcomes. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 207–228). New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Spencer Foundation.Google Scholar
  57. Pinderhughes, E., Dodge, K., Bates, J., Pettit, G., & Zelli, A. (2000). Discipline responses: Influences of parents’ socioeconomic status, ethnicity, beliefs about parenting, stress, and cognitive-emotional processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Powell, D. (1993). Inside home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 3, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Price, J. (2008). Parent-child quality time: Does birth order matter? Journal of Human Resources, 43, 240–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Price, J. (2010). The effect of parental time investments: Evidence from natural within-family variation. Unpublished manuscript, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  61. Putnam, R., Frederick, C., & Snellman, K. (2012). Growing class gaps in social connectedness among American youth. Unpublished manuscript, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  62. Ramey, G., & Ramey, V. (2010). The rug rat race. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 129–176.Google Scholar
  63. Reardon, S. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–116). New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Spencer Foundation.Google Scholar
  64. Ricciuti, A., St. Pierre, R., Lee, W., Parsad, A., & Rimdzius, T. (2004). Third national Even Start evaluation: Follow-up findings from the experimental design study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://www.ed.gov/ies/ncee.
  65. Roggman, L., Boyce, L., & Innocenti, M. (2008). Developmental parenting: A guide for early childhood practitioners. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  66. Sacks, D., & Stevenson, B. (2010, Spring). Comments and discussion. Brookings papers on economic activity (pp. 184-196). Washington, DC.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  67. Sayer, L., Gauthier, A., & Furstenberg, F. (2004). Educational differences in parents’ time with children: Cross-national variations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1152–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schaub, M. (2010). Parenting for cognitive development from 1950 to 2000: The institutionalization of mass education and the social construction of parenting in the United States. Sociology of Education, 83, 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shah, A., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338, 682–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. (1997). Consequences of living in poverty for young children’s cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement. In G. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 132–189). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  71. Stockwell, M., Kharbanda, E., Martinez, R., Vargas, Y., Vawdrey, D., & Camargo, S. (2012). Effect of a text messaging intervention on influenza vaccination in an urban, low-income pediatric and adolescent population: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 1702–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Swift, A. (2005). Justice, luck, and the family. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. Osborne Groves (Eds). Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (pp. 256–276). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Thaler, R., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, S164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service, Elementary and Secondary Education Division (2003). Third National Even Start Evaluation: Program impacts and implications for improvement (No. 2003-05). Retrieved from http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/2003107409351_80519.pdf.
  75. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). National assessment of adult literacy. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  76. U.S. Department of Labor (2011). Economic news release: American time use survey-2010 results. Available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf.
  77. Villena-Rodán, B., & Ríos-Aguilar, C. (2011). Causal effects of maternal time investment on childrens cognitive outcomes. Documentos de Trabajo 285, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
  78. Wagner, M., & Clayton, S. (1999). The Parents as Teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. Future of Children, 9, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wagner, M., Spiker, D., & Linn, M. (2002). The effectiveness of the Parents as Teachers program with low-income parents and children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2011). Early years policy. Child Development Research. 2011, Article ID 343016, doi: 10.1115/2011/343016.
  81. Warner, J. (2005). Perfect madness: Motherhood in the age of anxiety. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Human Potential and Public Policy, Harris School of Public Policy StudiesUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations