Analytics of Risk and Challenge

  • Hussein A. Abbass
Chapter

Abstract

As emphasized several times in the previous chapter, CRT is about analyzing risk and designing deliberate challenges. Whether we are deliberately challenging the effectiveness of a strategic plan or the scalability of an optimization or big-data mining algorithm, the concept of a challenge has the same fundamental characteristics. The purpose of this chapter is to develop a disciplinary approach to structure and model the analysis of risk and the concept of a challenge. This structure can assist an automated system to risk assess and challenge a human or a computer autonomously, and to teach the concept of challenge in a disciplinary manner to humans. What is risk? How to analyze risk and how to “think” risk? What is a challenge? What do we mean by deliberate? How do we design and model the concept of a challenge deliberately? How do we systematically design a challenge on which both humans and computers to operate? This chapter will address these questions by establishing a unifying theory that defines and models systems, uncertainty, ability, skill, capacity, competency, performance, capability, and our ultimate aim, risk and challenge.

Keywords

Risk Analytic Objective Space Challenge Analytic Deliberate Action Blue Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbass, H.A., Petraki, E.: The causes for no causation: a computational perspective. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 10(1), 51–74 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Einstein, A., Infeld, L.: The Evolution of Physics. Simon and Shuster, New York (1938)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellestad, M.H.: Stress testing: principles and practice. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 28(11), 1142–1144 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaidow, S., Boey, S., Egudo, R.: A review of the capability options development and analysis system and the role of risk management. Technical Report DSTO-GD-0473, DSTO (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert, T.F.: Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance. Wiley, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimshaw, M., Lindley, C.A., Nacke, L.: Sound and immersion in the first-person shooter: mixed measurement of the player’s sonic experience. In: Proceedings of Audio Mostly Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/. Accessed 1 Feb 2014
  8. 8.
    ISO: ISO 31000:2009, Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendoza, S.: From a theory of certainty to a theory of challenge: ethnography of an intercultural communication class. Intercult. Commun. Stud. 14, 82–99 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanford, N.: Self and society: social change and individual development. Transaction Publishers, Brunswick (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sawah, S.E., Abbass, H.A., Sarker, R.: Risk in interdependent systems: a framework for analysis and mitigation through orchestrated adaptation. Technical Report TR-ALAR-200611013, University of New South Wales (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hussein A. Abbass
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of New South Wales AustraliaCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations