Analysis of Qualitative Dynamic Properties of Positive Polynomial Systems Using Transformations

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 94)

Abstract

Two classes of positive polynomial systems, quasi-polynomial (QP) systems and reaction kinetic networks with mass action law (MAL-CRN), are considered. QP systems are general descriptors of ODEs with smooth right-hand sides; their stability properties can be checked by algebraic methods (linear matrix inequalities). On the other hand, MAL-CRN systems possess a combinatorial characterization of their structural stability properties using their reaction graph.

Dynamic equivalence and similarity transformations applied either to the variables (quasi-monomial and time-reparametrization transformations) or to the phase state space (translated X-factorable transformation) will be applied to construct a dynamically similar linear MAL-CRN model to certain given QP system models. This way one can establish sufficient structural stability conditions based on the underlying reaction graph properties for the subset of QP system models that enable such a construction.

Keywords

Polynomial ODEs Positive systems Dynamic equivalence  Dynamic similarity Structural stability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to Prof. István Győri on the occasion of his 70th birthday. This research has been supported by the Hungarian National Research Fund through grants NF104706 and K83440.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, D.F.: A proof of the Global Attractor Conjecture in the single linkage class case. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71, 1487–1508 (2011)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angeli, D.: A tutorial on chemical network dynamics. Eur. J. Contr. 15, 398–406 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenig, L.: Complete factorisation and analytic solutions of generalized Lotka-Volterra equations. Phys. Lett. A 133, 378–382 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brenig, L., Goriely, A.: Universal canonical forms for the time-continuous dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4119–4122 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bykov, V., Gorban, A., Yablonskii, G., Elokhin, V.: Kinetic models of catalytic reactions. In: Compton, R. (ed.) Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, vol. 32. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chellaboina, V., Bhat, S.P., Haddad, W.M., Bernstein, D.S.: Modeling and analysis of mass-action kinetics—nonnegativity, realizability, reducibility, and semistability. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 29, 60–78 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    der Schaft, A.V., Rao, S., Jayawardhana, B.: On the mathematical structure of balanced chemical reaction networks governed by mass action kinetics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 73(2), 953–973 (2013)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feinberg, M.: Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors - I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 42(10), 2229–2268 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feinberg, M., Horn, F.: Chemical mechanism structure and the coincidence of the stoichiometric and kinetic subspaces. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 66(1), 83–97 (1977)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Figueiredo, A., Gleria, I.M., Filho, T.M.R.: Boundedness of solutions and Lyapunov functions in quasi-polynomial systems. Phys. Lett. A 268, 335–341 (2000)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gléria, I., Figueiredo, A., Filho, T.R.: On the stability of a class of general non-linear systems. Phys. Lett. A 291, 11–16 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gorban, A., Karlin, I., Zinovyev, A.: Invariant grids for reaction kinetics. Phys. A 33, 106–154 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halanay, A., Rasvan, V.: Applications of Liapunov methods in stability. Kluwer Academic Publichers, Dordrecht (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hangos, K.M., Szederkényi,G.: The underlying linear dynamics of some positive polynomial systems. Phys. Lett. A 376, 3129–3134 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magyar, A., Szederkényi, G., Hangos, K.: Globally stabilizing feedback control of process systems in generalized Lotka-Volterra form. J. Process Contr. 18, 80–91 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meiss, J.: Differential Dynamical Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rasvan, V.: Dynamical systems with several equilibria and natural Liapunov functions. Arch. Math. (Brno) 34(1), 207–215 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samardzija, N., Greller, L.D., Wassermann, E.: Nonlinear chemical kinetic schemes derived from mechanical and electrical dynamical systems. J. Chem. Phys. 90(4), 2296–2304 (1989)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scherer, C., Weiland, S.: Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control. DISC, (2000) http://www.er.ele.tue.nl/sweiland/lmi.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PannoniaVeszprémHungary
  2. 2.Computer and Automation Research InstituteBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Faculty of Information TechnologyPeter Pázmány Catholic UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations