Striking a Fair Balance Between the Protection of Creative Content and the Need to Foster Its Dissemination: The Challenges Posed by Internet Linking and Meta Search Engines

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

In recent years, the ability to make available, locate and access copyright protected content over the Internet has increased considerably. Some business models are directly aimed at linking or locating content already made available by other services. Such business models may create value for end users by making it easier to locate and find content on the Internet, but at the same time, they may be deemed to appropriate value from the rightholders or their service providers. In some cases, this has led to tensions and even litigations between the providers of these new business models and the rightholders or their service providers. These tensions are reflections of the underlying policy concerns inherent in the field of copyright law on the necessity to strike a fair balance between the protection of creative content and measures to foster its dissemination. This article will discuss, analyse and draw conclusions from two recent cases from the Court of Justice of the European Union on Internet linking and meta search engines, Svensson and Others and Innoweb, and relate them to the underlying policy concerns in copyright law.

Keywords

Search Engine Protected Work Creative Content Copyright Holder Berne Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Articles, Books and Book Chapters

  1. Aplin, T. (2005). Copyright law in the digital society: the challenges of multimedia. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Axhamn, J. (2013). Exceptions, limitations and collective management of rights as vehicles for access to information. In D. Beldiman (Ed.), Access to information and knowledge 21st century challenges in intellectual property and knowledge governance (pp. 164–186). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2008). Intellectual property law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berne Convention Centenary (1986). The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works from 1886 to 1986, published by the International Bureau of Intellectual Property, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. de Beer, J., & Burri, M. (2014). Transatlantic copyright comparisons: Making available via hyperlinks in the European Union and Canada. In: European intellectual property review (pp. 95–105). Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ginsburg, J. (2014). Hyperlinking and “making available”. In European intellectual property law review (pp. 147–148).Google Scholar
  8. Ficsor, M. (2002). The law of copyright and the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kur, A., & Dreier, T. (2013). European intellectual property law: text cases and materials. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar (p. 299).Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein, P., & Hugenholtz, P. B. (2013). International copyright. Principles, law, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Litman, J. (2001). Digital copyright: Revising copyright law for the information age. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  12. Olivas, J. A. (2008). Fuzzy sets and web meta-search engines. In H. Bustince, et al. (Eds.), Fuzzy sets and their extensions: Representations, aggregation and models (pp. 537–552). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ricketson, S., & Ginsburg, J. (2006). International copyright and neighbouring rights: The Berne convention and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Riis, T. (2013). Ophavsrettens fleksibilitet, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, p. 139 et seq. Google Scholar
  15. Rognstad, O. -A. (2003). Konsumpsjon og digitale overføringer—Et forslag til en alternativ løsningsmodell. In: Festskrift til Mogens Koktvedgaard (pp. 447–472).Google Scholar
  16. Rosati, E. (2013). Originality in EU copyright: Full harmonization through case law. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Rosén, J. (2012). Media-och upphovsrätt, Skrifter utgivna av Juridiska fakulteten vid Stockholms universitet nr 78.Google Scholar
  18. Rosén, J. (2012). Länkning till streamade TV-program, in Media-och upphovsrätt (p. 164).Google Scholar
  19. Strowel, A., & Ide, N. (2001). Liability with regard to hyperlinks. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 24, 403–448.Google Scholar
  20. Tsoutsanis, A. (2014). Why copyright and linking can tango. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  21. Udsen, H., & Schovsbo, J. (2006). Ophavsrettens missing link? Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (pp. 47–65).Google Scholar
  22. von Lewinski, S. (2008). International copyright law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Walter, M., & von Lewinski, S. (2010). European copyright law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Westman, D. (2012). Länkning som upphovsrättslig överföring till allmänheten? Svensk Juristtidning (pp. 800–823).Google Scholar
  25. WIPO (1978). Guide to the Berne Convention for the protection of literary and artistic works (Paris Act, 1971). Geneva: WIPO.Google Scholar
  26. WIPO Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and glossary of copyright and related rights terms. Geneva: WIPO.Google Scholar
  27. Wu, S., & Li, J. (2004). Effectiveness evaluation and comparison of web search engines and meta-search engines. In: Advances in web-age information management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Vol. 3129, pp. 303–314).Google Scholar

Web resources

  1. ALAI Report and Opinion on the making available and communication to the public in the internet environment—focus on linking techniques on the Internet. Adopted unanimously by the Executive Committee 16 Sept 2013. Available at http://www.alai.org/assets/files/resolutions/making-available-right-report-opinion.pdf. Last visited on 16 Apr 2014.
  2. An ancillary right over news to be soon introduced (also) into Spanish law? posted on the IPKat blog on 16 February 2014. Available at http://ipkitten.blogspot.se/2014/02/an-ancillary-right-over-news-to-be-soon.html. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.
  3. CJEU takes foot of the GasPedaal, then puts the boot in, posted on The 1709 Blog on 25 December 2013. Available at http://the1709blog.blogspot.se/2013/12/cjeu-takes-foot-off-gaspedaal-then-puts.html. Last visited on 14 Apr 2014.
  4. Does Innoweb hinder innovation on the web? posted on the Kluwer Copyright Blog 20 January 2014. Available at http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2014/01/20/eu-does-innoweb-hinder-innovation-on-the-web/. Last visited on 14 Apr 2014.
  5. ECJ ruling on meta search engines strengthens position of database right holders available at http://www.debrauw.com/newsletter/ecj-ruling-meta-search-engines-strengthens-position-database-right-holders. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.
  6. European Copyright Society: Opinion on the reference to the CJEU in Case C-466/12 Svensson, dated 15 Feb 2013. Available at http://www.ivir.nl/news/European_Copyright_Society_Opinion_on_Svensson.pdf. Last visited on 16 Apr 2014.
  7. Hyperlinks, making available and the “new public”—or just a dead end?, posted on the 1709 Blog on 14 Feb 2014. Available at http://the1709blog.blogspot.se/2014/02/hyperlinks-making-available-and-new.html. Last visited on 15 Apr 2014.
  8. Post-Svensson Stress Disorder #1: Does it matter whether linked content is lawful? posted on the IPKat on 21 Feb 2014. Available at http://ipkitten.blogspot.se/2014/02/post-svensson-stress-disorder-1-does-it.html. Last visited on 14 Apr 2014.
  9. Post-Svensson stress disorder #2: What does “freely available” mean? posted on the IPKat blog on 7 March 2014. Available at http://ipkitten.blogspot.se/2014/03/post-svensson-stress-disorder-2-what.html. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.
  10. Stepping on the GasPedaal: CJEU rules on re-utilisation of car-ad database, posted on The IPKat blog on 24 Dec 2013. Available at http://ipkitten.blogspot.se/2013/12/stepping-on-gaspedaal-cjeu-rules-on-re.html. Last visited on 14 Apr 2014.
  11. Svensson—free to link or link at your risk? posted on the Cybereagle blog on 18 Feb 2014. Available at http://cyberleagle.blogspot.se/2014/02/svensson-free-to-link-or-link-at-your.html. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.
  12. Svensson—it’s all about the “new public”, posted on the 1709 blog on 13 Feb 2014. Available at http://the1709blog.blogspot.se/2014/02/svensson-its-all-about-new-public.html. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.
  13. When is web-scraping of a database unlawful? posted on 7 January 2014. Available at http://www.mayerbrown.com/When-is-web-scraping-of-a-database-unlawful-01-07-2014/. Last visited on 20 Apr 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations