Advertisement

Internet Voting in Estonia: From Constitutional Debate to Evaluation of Experience over Six Elections

  • Ülle MadiseEmail author
  • Priit Vinkel
Chapter

Abstract

Remote Internet voting has been allowed in Estonia since 2005 in all types of public elections. The share of online voters has risen to 20–25 %. According to surveys, Internet voting slightly increases general voter turnout, contrary to common expectations does not favor well-educated young urban population and is politically neutral. Significant factors predicting the use of Internet as a voting channel are computer skills and trust. The constitutionality of online voting and of postal voting lends itself to similar analysis with the exception of Internet as a channel. We argue that Internet voting is constitutional, if reliable remote authentication, electronic voter roll, and control mechanisms preventing from any kind of manipulation are in place: the I-votes must be cast as intended, stored as cast, and counted as recorded. In an advanced information society, online voting could be even seen as a required means of guaranteeing universal suffrage and voting equality. On the other hand, the impact of remote e-services on human psychology and behavior needs further research. The results of such scholarly work might lead to new arguments in legal analysis as well.

Keywords

Voter Turnout Vote Decision Vote Method Electronic Vote Universal Suffrage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ansper, A., Heiberg, S., Lipmaa, H., Øverland, T. A., & van Laenen, F. (2009). Security and trust for the Norwegian E-voting pilot project E-valg 2011. In A. Jøsang, T. Maseng, & S. J. Knapskog (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science, 5838, NordSec 2009, Oslo, October 14–16, 2009 (pp. 207–222). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Barrat, J., Goldsmith, B., & Turner, J. (2012). International experience with E-voting. Washington: IFES foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Breuer, F., & Trechsel, A. H. (2006). E-voting in the 2005 local elections in Estonia: Report for the council of Europe. Available at the Estonian National Electoral Committee website www.vvk.ee. Accessed January 2014.
  4. Buchstein, H. (2004). Online democracy, is it viable? Is it desirable? Internet voting and normative democratic theory. In N. Kersting & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), Electronic voting and democracy. A comparative analysis (pp. 39–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy (p. 95). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Drechsler, W., & Madise, Ü. (2004). Electronic voting in Estonia. In N. Kersting & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), Electronic voting and democracy. A comparative analysis (pp. 97–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (2013). Survey on individuals regularly using the Internet and on households—level of Internet access. Google Scholar
  8. Gerlach, J., & Gasser, U. (2009) Three case studies from Switzerland: E-voting. Internet and democracy case study series. Berkman Center Research Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Heiberg, S., Laud, P., & Villemson, J. (2012). The application of I-voting for Estonian parliamentary elections of 2011 In: A. Kiyaias & H. Lipmaa (Eds.), Postproceedings of the 3rd International Conference on E-voting and Identity, Tallinn, September 29–30, 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7187 (pp. 208–223). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Heiberg, S., Lipmaa, H., & van Laenen, F. (2010). On E-vote integrity in the case of malicious voter computers. In D. Gritzalis & B. Preneel (Eds.), Computer security—ESORICS 2010: Esorics 2010, Athens, September 20–22, 2010 (pp. 373–388). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Heinsalu, A., Koitmäe, A., Pilving, M., & Vinkel, P. (2012). Elections in Estonia 1992–2011. Tallinn: National Library of Estonia.Google Scholar
  12. Kalvet, T. (2012). Innovation: A factor explaining e–government success in Estonia. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 9(2), 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kattel, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Kalvet, T. (2011). Small states, innovation and administrative capacity. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Madise, Ü. (2008). Legal and political aspects of the Internet voting: Estonian case. In J. M. Reniu (Ed.), E-voting: the last electoral revolution (pp. 45–59). Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Politiques i Socials.Google Scholar
  15. Madise, Ü., & Maaten, E. (2010). Internet voting in Estonia. In D. R. Insua & S. French (Eds.), e-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective (pp. 301–321). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Madise, Ü., & Martens, T. (2006). I-voting in Estonia 2005. The first practice of country-wide binding Internet voting in the world. In R. Krimmer (Ed.), Electronic voting 2006 (pp. 15–26). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.Google Scholar
  17. Madise, Ü., & Vinkel, P. (2011). Constitutionality of remote internet voting: The Estonian perspective. In Juridica International, 18, 4–16. Google Scholar
  18. Mägi, T. (2007). Practical security analysis of I-voting systems. Available at http://triinu.net/e-voting. Accessed January 2014.
  19. Maurer, A., Spycher, O., Taglioni, G., & Weber, A. (2012). E-voting for Swiss abroad: A joint project between the confederation and the cantons. In Electronic voting 2012 (pp. 173–187). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.Google Scholar
  20. Monnoyer-Smith, L. (2006). How I-voting technology challenges traditional concepts of citizenship: an analysis of French voting rituals. In R. Krimmer (Ed.), Electronic voting 2006 (pp. 61–68). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.Google Scholar
  21. Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2014). E-governance in law and by law. The legal framework of e-governance. In E-technology in the EU: Normative Realities and Trends. Google Scholar
  22. Rolfe, M. (2012). Voter turnout: A social theory of political participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Recommendation Rec. (2004). ‘Legal, operational and technical standards for I-voting’ of the council of Europe. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dgap/democracy/activities/ggis/e-voting/key_documents/Rec(2004)11_Eng_Evoting_and_Expl_Memo_en.pdf. Accessed January, 2014.
  24. Skagestein, G., Haug, A. V., Nødtvedt, E., & Rossebø, J. (2006). How to create trust in electronic voting over an untrusted platform. In R. Krimmer (Ed.), Electronic voting 2006 (pp. 107–116). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.Google Scholar
  25. Trechsel, A. & Vassil, K. (2011). Internet voting in Estonia: A comparative analysis of five elections since 2005. European University Institute 2011. Available at the Estonian National Electoral Committee website www.vvk.ee. Accessed January, 2014.
  26. Vassil, K., & Weber, T. (2011). A bottelneck model of E-voting: Why technology fails to boost turnout. New Media & Society, 1–19. Accessed 23 Jun 2011Google Scholar
  27. Vinkel, P. (2012). Internet voting in Estonia. In p. Laud (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science, NordSec 2011, Tallinn, Estonia October 26–28, 2011 (pp. 4–12). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. World Economic Forum. (2013). The global information technology report 2013. Available at World Economic Forum website http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-information-technology-report-2013. Accessed January, 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Constitutional and International LawUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and GovernanceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations