Flexible Thread-like Electrical Stimulation Implants Based on Rectification of Epidermically Applied Currents Which Perform Charge Balance

  • Antoni IvorraEmail author
  • Laura Becerra-Fajardo
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 7)


Miniaturization of implantable medical electronic devices is currently compromised by the available means for powering them. Most common energy supply techniques for implants – batteries and inductive links – comprise bulky parts which, in most cases, are larger than the circuitry they feed. For overcoming such miniaturization bottleneck in the case of implants for electrical stimulation, we recently proposed and demonstrated a method in which the implants operate as rectifiers of bursts of high frequency current supplied by skin electrodes. In this way, low frequency currents capable of performing stimulation of excitable tissues are generated locally through the implants whereas the auxiliary high frequency currents only cause innocuous heating. The electronics of the prototype we demonstrated previously consisted of a single diode. As a consequence, it caused dc currents through it which made it impractical for clinical applications. Here we present an implantable prototype which performs charge balance for preventing electrochemical damage. It consists of a tubular silicone body with a diameter of 1 mm, two peripheral electrodes and a central electronic circuit made up of a diode, two capacitors and a resistor. We also report that this circuitry works even when water immersed, which may avoid the need for hermetic packaging.


Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Spice Simulation Excitable Tissue High Frequency Current Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kane, M.J., Breen, P.P., Quondamatteo, F., ÓLaighin, G.: BION microstimulators: A case study in the engineering of an electronic implantable medical device. Med. Eng. Phys. 33, 7–16 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziaie, B., Nardin, M.D., Coghlan, A.R., Najafi, K.: A single-channel implantable microstimulator for functional neuromuscular stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44, 909–920 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ivorra, A.: Remote electrical stimulation by means of implanted rectifiers. PLoS ONE 6(8), e23456 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivorra, A., Becerra-Fajardo, L.: Wireless Microstimulators Based on Electronic Rectification of Epidermically Applied Currents: Safety and Portability Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th IFESS Annual Conference, San Sebastián, Spain, pp. 213–216 (June 2013) ISBN 978-86-7466-462-9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ivorra, A., Sacristán, J., Baldi, A.: Injectable Rectifiers as Microdevices for Remote Electrical Stimulation: an Alternative to Inductive Coupling. In: World Congress 2012 on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, IFMBE Proceedings, Beijing, China, pp. 1581–1584 (May 2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becerra-Fajardo, L., Ivorra, A.: Proof of Concept of a Stimulator Based on AC Current Rectification for Neuroprosthetics. In: Libro De Actas XXX CASEIB 2012, San Sebastián, Spain, p. 76 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palti, Y.: Stimulation of muscles and nerves by means of externally applied electrodes. Bull. Res. Counc. Isr Sect. E. Exp. Med. 10, 54–56 (1962)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schuder, J.C., Stoeckle, H.: The silicon diode as a receiver for electrical stimulation of body organs. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 10, 366–370 (1964)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cogan, S.F.: Neural Stimulation and Recording Electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 275–309 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lyons, G.M., Sinkjaer, T., Burridge, J.H., Wilcox, D.J.: A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 10, 260–279 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasskazoff, S.Y., Slavin, K.V.: An update on peripheral nerve stimulation. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 56, 279–285 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sauter, A.R., et al.: Current threshold for nerve stimulation depends on electrical impedance of the tissue. Anesth. Analg. 108, 1338–1343 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Troyk, P.R.: Injectable electronic identification, monitoring, and stimulation systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1, 177–209 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Information and Communication TechnologiesUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations