Hybrid Evolutionary Workflow Scheduling Algorithm for Dynamic Heterogeneous Distributed Computational Environment

  • Denis Nasonov
  • Nikolay Butakov
  • Marina Balakhontseva
  • Konstantin Knyazkov
  • Alexander V. Boukhanovsky
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 299)

Abstract

The optimal workflow scheduling is one of the most important issues in heterogeneous distributed computational environment. Existing heuristic and evolutionary scheduling algorithms have their advantages and disadvantages. In this work we propose a hybrid algorithm based on Heterogeneous Earliest Finish Time heuristic and genetic algorithm that combines best characteristics of both approaches. We also experimentally show its efficiency for variable workload in dynamically changing heterogeneous computational environment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R.: A taxonomy of workflow management systems for grid computing. Journal of Grid Computing 3(3-4), 171–200 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arabnejad, H.: List Based Task Scheduling Algorithms on Heterogeneous Systems-An overview (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Topcuoglu, H., Hariri, S., Wu, M.: Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 13(3), 260–274 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blythe, J., Jain, S., Deelman, E., Gil, A., Vahi, K.: Task scheduling strategies for workflow-based applications in grids. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID 2005), UK (May 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jakob, W., Strack, S., Quinte, A., Bengel, G., Stucky, K.U., Süß, W.: Fast Rescheduling of Multiple Workflows to Constrained Heterogeneous Resources Using Multi-Criteria Memetic Computing. Algorithms 6(2), 245–277 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, L., Singh, S.: A Survey of Workflow Scheduling Algorithms and Research Issues. International Journal of Computer Applications 74(15) (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, USA (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sinnen, O.: Task scheduling for parallel systems, p. 108. Wiley-Interscience (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casanova, H., Legrand, A., Zagorodnov, D., Berman, F.: Heuristics for scheduling parameter sweep applications in grid environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW 2000), pp. 349–363. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman, M., Hassan, R., Ranjan, R., Buyya, R.: Adaptive workflow scheduling for dynamic grid and cloud computing environment. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 25(13), 1816–1842 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xhafa, F., Alba, E., Dorronsoro, B., Duran, B., Abraham, A.: Efficient Batch Job Scheduling in Grids Using Cellular Memetic Algorithms. In: Xhafa, F., Abraham, A. (eds.) Metaheuristics for Scheduling in Distributed Computing Environments. SCI, vol. 146, pp. 273–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, X., Chen, J., Wu, Z., Ni, Z., Yuan, D., Yang, Y.: Handling Recoverable Temporal Violations in Scientific Workflow Systems: A Workflow Rescheduling Based Strategy. In: 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Bharathi, S., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Mehta, G., Su, M.H., Vahi, K.: Characterization of scientific workflows. In: Third Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS 2008, pp. 1–10. IEEE (November 2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corchado, E., Wozniak, M., Abraham, A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Snásel, V.: Recent trends in intelligent data analysis. Neurocomputing 126, 1–2 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calvo-Rolle, J.L., Corchado, E.: A Bio-inspired knowledge system for improving combined cycle plant control tuning. Neurocomputing 126, 95–105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Nasonov
    • 1
  • Nikolay Butakov
    • 1
  • Marina Balakhontseva
    • 1
  • Konstantin Knyazkov
    • 1
  • Alexander V. Boukhanovsky
    • 2
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint-Petersburg, Russian FederationRussia
  2. 2.Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social SciencesWassenaarThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations