Advertisement

Analysis of Basic Relations Within Insights of Spatio-Temporal Analysis

  • Andreas Hall
  • Paula Ahonen-Rainio
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Studying human reasoning in interaction with visual analytics tools is an important part of visual analytics research. This case study contributes to the field by investigating the role that the basic spatial and temporal relations play in the analytical reasoning process. After a thorough literature review a case study was performed that applies reverse engineering and introspection as its research methods. In the case study the link between the basic spatio-temporal relations and human qualitative reasoning was explored by means of the dissection of four insights reached by an analyst watching a simple animated map. The results of the case study support the hypothesis showing that insight can be broken down to, and derived from, the level of basic relations. At the same time, the important role of the reference system and the previous knowledge of the analyst became evident.

Keywords

Reverse Engineering Reasoning Process Basic Relation Analytical Reasoning Cognitive Artifact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen JF (1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artif Intell 23(2):123–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias-Hernandez R, Kaastra LT, Green TM et al (2011) Pair analytics: capturing reasoning processes in collaborative visual analytics. In: 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS)Google Scholar
  3. Arias-Hernandez R, Green TM, Fisher B (2012) From cognitive amplifiers to cognitive prostheses: understandings of the material basis of cognition in visual analytics. Interdiscip Sci Rev 37(1):4–18. doi: 10.1179/0308018812Z.0000000001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur WB (1994) Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. Am Econ Rev 84(2):406–411Google Scholar
  5. Bhatt M, Wallgrün JO (2014) Geospatial narratives and their spatio-temporal dynamics: commonsense reasoning for high-level analyses in geographic information systems. ISPRS Int J Geoinf 3(1):166–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang R, Ziemkiewicz C, Green TM et al (2009) Defining insight for visual analytics. Comput Graph Appl 29(2):14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohn AG, Hazarika SM (2001) Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: an overview. Fundamenta Informaticae 46(1):1–29Google Scholar
  8. Dou W, Jeong DH, Stukes F et al (2009) Recovering reasoning processes from user interactions. Comput Graph Appl 29(3):52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eccles R, Kapler T, Harper R et al (2008) Stories in geotime. Inf Vis 7(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egenhofer MJ (1991) Reasoning about binary topological relations. In: Günther O, Schek H (eds) Proceedings of the second international symposium on advances in spatial databases, 28–30 August 1991. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol 525. Springer, London, pp 141–160Google Scholar
  11. Egenhofer MJ, Mark DM (1995) Naive geography. In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 988. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  12. Egeth HE, Yantis S (1997) Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu Rev Psychol 48(1):269–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher WR (1984) Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Commun Monogr 51(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freksa C (2013) Spatial computing. In: Raubal M, Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–42Google Scholar
  15. Freundschuh S, Blades M (2013) The cognitive development of the spatial concepts NEXT, NEAR, AWAY and FAR. In: Raubal M, Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–62Google Scholar
  16. Galton A (2009) Spatial and temporal knowledge representation. Earth Sci Inf 2(3):169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodwin GP, Johnson-Laird P (2005) Reasoning about relations. Psychol Rev 112(2):468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotz D, Zhou MX (2009) Characterizing users’ visual analytic activity for insight provenance. Inf Vis 8(1):42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green TM, Ribarsky W, Fisher B (2008) Visual analytics for complex concepts using a human cognition model. In: IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology, p 91–98Google Scholar
  20. Hall A, Ahonen-Rainio P, Virrantaus K (2014) Knowledge and reasoning in spatial analysis. Trans GIS 18(3):464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hashimoto I (2003) 1945–1998. http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-hashimoto/. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
  22. Jankun-Kelly T, Ma K, Gertz M (2007) A model and framework for visualization exploration. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13(2):357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson-Laird PN (2006) How we reason. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller T, Tergan S (2005) Visualizing knowledge and information: an introduction. In: Tergan SO, Keller T (eds) Knowledge and information visualization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  25. Klippel A (2012) Spatial information theory meets spatial thinking: is topology the Rosetta stone of spatio-temporal cognition? Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(6):1310–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klippel A, Li R, Yang J et al (2013) The Egenhofer–Cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity? In: Raubal M, Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–215Google Scholar
  27. Knauff M (2009) A neuro-cognitive theory of deductive relational reasoning with mental models and visual images. Spat Cogn Comput 9(2):109–137Google Scholar
  28. Knauff M, Rauh R, Renz J (1997) A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: results from an empirical investigation. In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–206Google Scholar
  29. Kosslyn SM, Chabris CF, Marsolek CJ et al (1992) Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(2):562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu Z, Nersessian N, Stasko J (2008) Distributed cognition as a theoretical framework for information visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 14(6):1173–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mark DM (1999) Spatial representation: a cognitive view. Geogr Inf Syst Princ Appl 1:81–89Google Scholar
  33. Mark DM, Frank AU (1989) Concepts of space and spatial language. In: Ninth international symposium on computer-assisted cartography (Auto-Carto 9), Baltimore, pp 538–556Google Scholar
  34. McDonnell R, Kemp K (1996) International GIS dictionary. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Nystuen JD (1968) Identification of some fundamental spatial concepts. In: Berry B, Marble D (eds) Spatial analysis. A reader in statistical geography. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 35–41Google Scholar
  37. Piaget J, Inhelder B (1956) The child’s conception of space. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinker S (2009) How the mind works. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Randell DA, Cui Z, Cohn AG (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, pp 165–176Google Scholar
  40. Renz J, Nebel B (2007) Qualitative spatial reasoning using constraint calculi. In: Marco A, Pratt-Hartmann IE, van Benthem JFAK (eds) Handbook of spatial logics. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–215Google Scholar
  41. Ribarsky W, Fisher B, Pottenger WM (2009) Science of analytical reasoning. Inf Vis 8(4):254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Samarapungavan A (2009) Reasoning. The Gale Group. http://www.education.com/reference/article/reasoning/. Accessed 26 Nov 2013
  43. Saraiya P, North C, Duca K (2005) An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 11(4):443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shrinivasan YB, van Wijk JJ (2008) Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1237–1246Google Scholar
  45. Sloman S (2009) Causal models: how people think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas JJ, Cook KA (eds) (2005) Illuminating the path: the research and development agenda for visual analytics. IEEE CS PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Tversky B (2014) Visualizing thought. In: Huang W (ed) Handbook of human centric visualization. Springer, New York, pp 3–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalto University School of EngineeringEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations