Risk Accelerators in Disasters

Insights from the Typhoon Haiyan Response on Humanitarian Information Management and Decision Support
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8484)


Modern societies are increasingly threatened by disasters that require rapid response through ad-hoc collaboration among a variety of actors and organizations. The complexity within and across today’s societal, economic and environmental systems defies accurate predictions and assessments of damages, humanitarian needs, and the impact of aid. Yet, decision-makers need to plan, manage and execute aid response under conditions of high uncertainty while being prepared for further disruptions and failures. This paper argues that these challenges require a paradigm shift: instead of seeking optimality and full efficiency of procedures and plans, strategies should be developed that enable an acceptable level of aid under all foreseeable eventualities. We propose a decision- and goal-oriented approach that uses scenarios to systematically explore future developments that may have a major impact on the outcome of a decision. We discuss to what extent this approach supports robust decision-making, particularly if time is short and the availability of experts is limited. We interlace our theoretical findings with insights from experienced humanitarian decision makers we interviewed during a field research trip to the Philippines in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan.


Disaster response humanitarian information management robust decision support risk management preparedness sensemaking 


  1. 1.
    Benjaafar, S., Morin, T., Talavage, J.: The strategic value of flexibility in sequential decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 82(3), 438–457 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Comes, T., Wijngaards, N., Maule, J., et al.: Scenario Reliability Assessment to Support Decision Makers in Situations of Severe Uncertainty. In: IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, pp. 30–37 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Comes, T., Wijngaards, N., Schultmann, F.: Efficient scenario updating in emergency management. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Vancouver (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Comes, T., Wijngaards, N., Van de Walle, B.: Exploring the Future: Runtime Scenario Selection for Complex and Time-Bound Decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coyne, R.: Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies 26(1), 5–17 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Draper, D.: Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57(1), 45–97 (1995)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dutton, J.: The Processing of Crisis and Non-Crisis Strategic Issues. Journal of Management Studies 23(5), 501–517 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fishburn, P.C.: Foundations of Risk Measurement. I. Risk As Probable Loss. Management Science 30(4), 396–406 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frosdick, S.: The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 6(3), 165–177 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gigerenzer, G., Dieckmann, A., Gaissmaier, W.: Efficient Cognition Through Limited Search. In: Todd, P., Gigerenzer, G. (eds.) Ecological Rationality. Intelligence in the World, pp. 241–273. Oxford University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gralla, E., Goentzel, J., Van de Walle, B.: Report from the Workshop on Field-Based Decision Makers’ Information Needs in Sudden Onset Disasters, DHN and ACAPS, Geneva (2012),
  12. 12.
    Haimes, Y., Kaplan, S., Lambert, J.H.: Risk Filtering, Ranking, and Management Framework Using Hierarchical Holographic Modeling. Risk Analysis 22(2), 383–398 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jüttner, U., Maklan, S.: Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 16(4), 246–259 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, L.: Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science 9(4), 506–521 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    King, D.: Post Disaster Surveys: experience and methodology. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 17(3), 39–47 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leadbetter, S.J., Hort, M.C.: Volcanic ash hazard climatology for an eruption of Hekla Volcano, Iceland. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 199(3-4), 230–241 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J.: Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research 152(3), 530–554 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pathak, S.D., Day, J.M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W.J., Kristal, M.M.: Complexity and Adaptivity in Supply Networks: Building Supply Network Theory Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences 38(4), 547–580 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H., de Meyer, A.: On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management. Management Science 48(8), 1008–1023 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rakitin, S.R.: Coping with Defective Software in Medical Devices. Computer 39(4), 40–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science 27(2-3), 183–213 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Renn, O.: Risk Governance. Towards an integrative approach, Geneva (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rippel, M., Teply, P.: Operational Risk - Scenario Analysis. Prague Economic Papers 1, 23–39 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155–169 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rothstein, H., Huber, M., Gaskell, G.: A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society 35(1), 91–112 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schoemaker, P.J.: Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation.  Strategic Management Journal 14(3), 193–213 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B., Yao, X.: The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS). JITTA 5(4), 1–35 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weber, E.P., Khademian, A.M.: Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. Public Administration Review 68(2), 334–349 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. . Research in Organizational Behaviour 21(1), 81–123 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Bueren, E.M., Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J.F.M.: Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(2), 193–212 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M.: Managing the unexpected. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wright, G., Goodwin, P.: Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: Enhancing the scenario method. International Journal of Forecasting 25(4), 813–825 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departement of ManagementTilburg UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Integrated Emergency ManagementUniversity of AgderNorway

Personalised recommendations