Advertisement

HCI Challenges for Community-Based Disaster Recovery

  • Jan Willem Streefkerk
  • Martijn Neef
  • Kenny Meesters
  • Reinout Pieneman
  • Kees van Dongen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8529)

Abstract

In disaster recovery, responding professional organizations traditionally assess the needs of communities following a disaster. Recent disasters have shown that volunteer capacities within the community are not yet integrated in recovery activities. To improve the efficiency of responding professionals and utilize the potential capacity from within the community, a platform is needed that identifies needs and capacities and provides situational overviews of recovery activities for different stakeholders. The proposed COBACORE platform aims to 1) bring community needs and capacities directly together, 2) allow professionals to better maintain awareness of recovery activities and to better deploy their capacities and 3) facilitate collaboration between professionals and responding communities. For each function and feature, the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) challenges are outlined. In ongoing work, a first prototype of this platform is implemented and evaluated with stakeholders in simulated disaster recovery activities.

Keywords

disaster recovery collaboration information exchange conceptual design community engagement training coordination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Crutchfield, M.: Phases of Disaster Recovery: Emergency Response for the Long Term, http://reliefweb.int/report/world/phases-disaster-recovery-emergency-response-long-term
  2. 2.
    Digital Humanitarian Network, http://digitalhumanitarians.com
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    White, C., Plotnick, L., Kushma, J., Hiltz, S.R., Turoff, M.: An online social network for emergency management. In: Proc. ISCRAM Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harvard Humanitarian Initiative: Disaster Relief 2.0: The future of information sharing in humanitarian emergencies. UN Foundation & Vodafone Technology Partnership (2011) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neef, M., van Dongen, K., Rijken, M.: Community-based Comprehensive Recovery: Closing collaboration gaps in urban disaster recovery. In: Proc. ISCRAM Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 546–550 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Environmental Agency: Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe. EEA Technical report No 13/2010, Copenhagen (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quarantelli, E.L.: The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know and Do Not Know from Research. Disaster Research Center. University of Delaware, Newark (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garfield, R., Blake, C., Chatainger, P., Walton-Ellery, S.: Common Needs Assessments and humanitarian action. Humanitarian Practice Network Paper, 69 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) - Needs Assessment Taskforce (NATF): Operational Guidance for Coordinated Assessments in Humanitarian Crises (2011) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhatt, M.R., Pandya, M., Murphy, C.: Community Damage Assessment and Demand Analysis. Experience Learning Series 33. All India Disaster Mitigation Institute (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UN OCHA: Mapping of Key Emergency Needs Assessments and Analysis - Final Report. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) (2009) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Federation of the Red Cross: World Disasters Report 2013: Focus on technology and the future of humanitarian action. IFRC (2013) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, J.P., Chen, R., Lee, J., Rao, H.: A case study of private–public collaboration for humanitarian free and open source disaster management software deployment. Dec. Supp. Syst. 55(1), 1–11 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roche, S., Propeck-Zimmermann, E., Mericskay, B.: GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 78(1), 21–40 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on CSCW. ACM (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jihan, S.H., Segev, A.: Context Ontology for Humanitarian Assistance in Crisis Response. In: Comes, T., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th ISCRAM Conference, pp. 526–535 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Willem Streefkerk
    • 1
  • Martijn Neef
    • 1
  • Kenny Meesters
    • 2
  • Reinout Pieneman
    • 1
  • Kees van Dongen
    • 1
  1. 1.TNOThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Tilburg UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations