Advertisement

Abstract

The user-interface (UI) of interactive systems is the meeting point of people with interactive communication technology (ICT). As a human product, it forms a part of culture that determines us, often without our full awareness. The values and goals of the designers are implicitly encoded in the interface and the documentation but can be in conflict with the values of the user. This is when both the intentional and unintentional manipulation with the user starts because he or she is presented with inappropriate choices or even inappropriate goals. The aim of this article is to show how this manipulation works, in which regards it is unavoidable and how can we deal with it. Ideologies are a special means of manipulation and we can counter them by suitable education and analysis.

Keywords

User-interface ideology values ethics manipulation persuasion rhetorics culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, P.B.: A theory of computer semiotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997) ISBN 0521448689Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauman, Z.: Liquid Modernity. Polity (2000) ISBN 9780745624105Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brejcha, J., Marcus, A.: Semiotics of interaction: Towards a UI Alphabet. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII/HCI 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8004, pp. 13–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bush, V.: As We May Think. In: The Atlantic Online (July 1945), http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush (accessed August 10, 2009), ISSN 1072-7825
  5. 5.
    Bogost, I.: Persuasive Games: The expressive power of videogames. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007) ISBN 9780262514880Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chun, W.H.K.: On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge. Grey Room, 26-51 (2005) ISSN 1526-3819Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, E.: Design 2.0: Minimalism, Transparency, and You, http://www.emilychang.com/go/weblog/comments/design-20-minimalism-transparency-and-you/ (accessed January 5, 2009)
  8. 8.
    De Souza, C.S.: The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005) ISBN 0262042207Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derrida, J.: Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press (1978) ISBN 9780226143293Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dilger, B.: The Ideology of Ease. Journal of Electronic Publishing 6 (September 2000), http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=jep;view=text;rgn=main;idno=3336451.0006.104 (accessed March 4, 2009), ISSN 1080-2711
  11. 11.
    Flusser, V.: Lob der Oberflächlichkeit. Bollmann Verlag, Mannheim (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flusser, V.: Into the Universe of Technical Images, University of Minnesota Press (2011) ISBN 978-0-8166-7020-8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flusser, V.: The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design. Reaktion Books (1999) ISBN 1861890559Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frasca, G.: Videogames of the oppressed: Critical thinking, education, tolerance, and other trivial issues. In: Wardrip-Fruin, N. (ed.) First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, pp. 85–94. MIT (2004) ISBN 0262731754Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (2003) ISBN 9781558606432Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galloway, A.R.: The Unworkable Interface. New Literary History 39, 931–955 (2009) ISSN 0028-6087Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marcus, A.: The Money Machine: Helping Baby Boomers Retire. User Experience 11(2), 24–27 (2012a)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marcus, A.: The Story Machine: a Mobile App to Change Family Story-Sharing Behavior. In: Procedings of CHI 2012, pp. 1–4 (2012b)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marcus, A.: Health machine. Information Design Journal 19(1), 69–89 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marcus, A., Jean, J.: Going green at home: the green machine. Information Design Journal 17(3), 235–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marcus, A.: Metaphor design in user interfaces. SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation 22(2) (1998) ISSN 0731-1001Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell, W.J.T.: Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. University of Chicago Press (July 1987) ISBN 0226532291Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morris, C.W.: Foundations of the Theory of Signs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970) ISBN 0226532321Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mullins, W.A.: On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science. The American Political Science Review 66, 498–510 (1972) ISSN 0003-0554Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nielsen, J.: Mastery, Mystery, and Misery: The Ideologies of Web Design. UseIt.com (2004), http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040830.html (accessed March 4, 2009), ISSN 1548-5552
  26. 26.
    Wai, C., Mortensen, P.: Persuasive technologies should be boring. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 96–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1987) ISBN 0201112973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Brejcha
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Science and LibrarianshipCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations