Dams on Shared Rivers: The Concept of Benefit Sharing

  • Waltina Scheumann
  • Ines Dombrowsky
  • Oliver Hensengerth
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)


In recent years, the concept of benefit sharing has been proposed as a means of fostering the cooperative use of international rivers. Most of the relevant literature focuses on opportunities for the generation of net benefits from cooperation; however, little attention has so far been paid to specific mechanisms for benefit sharing applied to the specific case of dams on international rivers. This paper fills this gap and asks both what incentives can be offered to encourage benefit sharing and what benefit-sharing mechanisms can be identified. Based on a conceptual approach, dam projects on the rivers Senegal, Columbia, Orange-Senqu, Nile and Zambezi are reviewed in order to explore the benefit-sharing mechanisms used at international levels. The paper also finds that negative environmental impacts are largely neglected, while social costs are not fully accounted for. The paper advocates for linking interstate with domestic benefit-sharing mechanisms which might be the ultimate step towards a socially inclusive, sustainable dam development.


Downstream State Upstream State Benefit Sharing International River Unilateral Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was co-funded by DIE and the GIZ Sector Project “Policy Advice for Sustainable Hydropower”.


  1. Africa Recovery (2004) vol 17, no 4. Accessed 2 Aug 2011
  2. African Development Bank (1988) Diama dam project: project performance evaluation report. African Development Bank, (no place)Google Scholar
  3. Agreement between the Republic of the Sudan and the United Arab Republic for the Full Utilization of the Nile Waters of 1959 (1959) In: Scheumann W, Schiffler M (eds) (1998) Water in the Middle East: potential for conflicts and prospects for cooperation. Springer, Berlin, pp 186–190Google Scholar
  4. Alam U, Dione O, Jeffrey P (2009) The benefit-sharing principle: implementing sovereignty bargains on water, in Political Geography, vol 28. pp 90–100Google Scholar
  5. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhaduri A, Manna U, Barbier E, Liebe J (2011) climate change and cooperation in transboundary water sharing: an application of stochastic stackelberg differential games in volta River Basin. Nat Resour Model 24(4):409–444. Further information: doi: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00097.x/abstract. Accessed 10 Jan 2014
  7. Biswas AK (1999) Management of international waters: opportunities and constraints. Int J Water Resour Manage 15(4):429–441Google Scholar
  8. Cernea MM, Mathur HM (2008) Can compensation prevent impoverishment? Reforming resettlement through investments and benefit-sharing. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Columbia River Treaty (1961). Accessed 2 Aug 2011
  10. Dinar S (2006) Assessing side-payments and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements: the geographic and economic connection. Political Geogr 25(4):412–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dombrowsky I (2007) Conflict, cooperation and Institutions in international water management. an economic analysis. Edward Elgar, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Dombrowsky I (2009) Revisiting the potential for benefit sharing in the management of trans-boundary rivers. Water Policy 11(2):125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dombrowsky I (2010) The role of intra-water sector issue linkage in the resolution of transboundary water conflicts. Water Int 35(2):132–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dombrowsky I, Bastian J, Däschle D, Heisig S, Peters J, Vosseler C (2014) International and local benefit sharing in hydropower projects on shared rivers: the Ruzizi III and Rusumo Falls cases (submitted to Water Policy)Google Scholar
  15. Duflo E, Pande R (2007) Dams. Q J Econ 122:601–646Google Scholar
  16. Durth R (1996) Grenzüberschreitende Umweltprobleme Und Regionale Integration. Zur Politischen Ökonomie von Oberlauf-Unterlauf-Problemen an internationalen Flüssen. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  17. Égré D (2007) UNEP dams and development project: compendium on relevant practices, 2nd stage. Revised final report, benefit sharing issue. UNEP, (no place)Google Scholar
  18. Égré D, Roquet V, Durocher C (2002) Benefit sharing from dam projects. Phase 1: desk study. Final report. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Égré D, Roquet V, Durocher C (2008) Benefit sharing to supplement compensation in resource extractive activities: the case of dams. In: Cernea MM, Mathur HM (eds) Can compensation prevent impoverishment? Reforming Resettlement through Investments and Benefit-Sharing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 317–357Google Scholar
  20. Fink M (2005) Integrating the world commission on dams recommendations in large dam planning processes: the case of Bui, Ghana. Mimeo, DortmundGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischhendler I, Feitelson E, Eaton D (2004) The short-term and long-term ramifications of linkages involving natural resources: the US-Mexico transboundary water case. Environ Plann C: Gov Policy 22(5):633–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frey FF (1993) The political context of conflict and cooperation over international River Basins. Water Int 18:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garrod G, Willis K (1999) Economic valuation of the environment: methods and case studies. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  24. Giordano MA, Wolf AT (2003) Transboundary freshwater treaties. In: Nakayama M (ed) International waters in Southern Africa. University Press, New York, pp 71–100Google Scholar
  25. Haas L (2009) Introducing benefit sharing around large dams in West Africa: drawing on regional and international experience. Global Water Initiative and International Institute for Environment and Development, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Hensengerth O (2011) Interaction of chinese institutions with host governments in dam construction. The Bui Dam in Ghana. Discussion Paper 3. German Development Institute, BonnGoogle Scholar
  27. Hensengerth O, Dombrowsky I, Scheumann W (2012) Benefit sharing in dam projects on shared rivers. Discussion Paper 6. German Development Institute, BonnGoogle Scholar
  28. International Energy Agency (2011) World Energy Outlook 2011. OECD, IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Kibaroglu A, Scheuman W, Kramer A (eds) (2011) Turkey’s water policy. National framework and international cooperation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Kipping M (2005) Wasserkonflikte und Wasserkooperation am Senegalfluss. In: Kipping M, Lindemann S (eds) Konflikte Und Kooperation Um Wasser: Wasserpolitik Am Senegalfluss Und Internationales Flussmanagement Im Südlichen Afrika. LIT Verlag, Münster, pp 22–107Google Scholar
  31. Kirschke S (2010) Grenzüberschreitendes Flussgebietsmanagement: Die Rolle Von Benefit Sharing-Mechanismen Im Rahmen der Senegalkooperation. Eschborn, GTZGoogle Scholar
  32. Klaphake A (2005) Kooperation an internationalen Flüssen aus ökonomischer Perspektive: das Konzept des Benefit Sharing. Discussion Paper 6. German Development Institute, BonnGoogle Scholar
  33. Klaphake A, Scheumann W (2009) Understanding transboundary water cooperation: evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa. In: Swatuk LA, Wirkus L (eds) Transboundary water governance in Southern Africa. Exploring underexplored dimensions. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 47–72Google Scholar
  34. Krutilla JV (1967) The Columbia river treaty: the economics of an international River Basin development. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  35. LeMarquand DG (1977) International rivers. The politics of cooperation. Westwater Research Center, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäler KG (1990) International environmental problems. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 6(1):80–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. McCartney M (2009) Living with dams: managing the environmental impacts. Water Policy 11(1):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meijerink SV (1999) Conflict and cooperation on the Scheldt River Basin: a case study of decision making on international Scheldt issues between 1967 and 1997. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mostert E (2005) How can international donors promote transboundary water management? Discussion Paper 8. German Development Institute, BonnGoogle Scholar
  41. Muckleston KW (2003) International management in the Columbia River Basin. UNESCO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearce DW (1999) Methodological issues in the economic analysis for involuntary resettlement operations. In: Cernea MM (ed) The economic of involuntary resettlement. Questions and challenges. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 50–82Google Scholar
  43. Phillips D, Daoudy M, McCaffrey S, Öjendal J, Turton A (2006) Transboundary water cooperation as a tool for conflict prevention and broader benefit-sharing. Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam RD (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int Org 42(3):427–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers P, de Silva R et al (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sadoff CW, Grey D (2002) Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy 4(5):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sadoff CW, Grey D (2005) Cooperation on international rivers: a continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water Int 30:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scudder T (2003) The Aswan high dam case. (Unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  49. Scudder T (2005) The Kariba case study. Working paper 1227. California Institute of Technology, PasadenaGoogle Scholar
  50. Skinner J, Krauss J, Newborne P (2014) Redistribution of revenues from hydropower dams: review of benefit-sharing mechanisms and local control (draft September 2013)Google Scholar
  51. Song J, Whittington D (2004) Why have some countries on international rivers been successful negotiating treaties? A global perspective. Water Resour Res 40:W05S06. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002536
  52. Trembath BP (2008) Beyond compensation: sharing of rents arising from hydropower projects. In: Cernea MM, Mathur HM (eds) Can compensation prevent impoverishment? Reforming resettlement through investments and benefit-sharing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 375–393Google Scholar
  53. Tumbare MJ (2002) Co-operation in the Zambesi River Basin. In: Al Baz I et al (eds) Co-operation on transboundary rivers. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 101–112Google Scholar
  54. Waterbury J (1997) Between unilateralism and comprehensive accords: modest steps toward cooperation in international River Basins. Int J Water Resour Dev 13(3):279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. World Bank (2001) Operational policy 4.12: involuntary resettlement; operational policy 4.12, Annex A: involuntary resettlement instruments; bank procedure 4.12: involuntary resettlement.,,contentMDK:20543978~menuPK:1286647~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:584435,00.html. Accessed 31 July 2011
  56. World Bank (2007) Africa region: irrigation business plan. Revised Draft, Washington DC (October 23)Google Scholar
  57. World Commission on Dams (2000a) Dams and development. A new framework for decision-making. Earthscan Publication Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. World Commission on Dams (2000b) Kariba dam Zambia and Zimbabwe. Final report, November. Accessed 31 July 2011
  59. World Summit on Sustainble Development Plan of Implementation (2002) World summit on sustainble development plan of implementation. Accessed 14 Dec 2011
  60. Yu T, Winston H (2008) Benefit sharing in international rivers: findings from the Senegal River Basin, the Columbia River Basin, and the Lesotho highlands water project. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Zambezi River Authority Agreement between the Republic of Zimbabwe and the Republic of Zambia concerning the utilization of the Zambezi River, 28 July 1987. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  62. Zeitoun M, Jägerskog A (2011) Addressing power asymmetry: how transboundary water management may serve to reduce poverty. Report 29. SIWI, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waltina Scheumann
    • 1
  • Ines Dombrowsky
    • 1
  • Oliver Hensengerth
    • 2
  1. 1.Deutsches Institut für EntwicklungspolitikBonnGerman
  2. 2.Oliver HensengerthNorthumbria UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations