Advertisement

Performance Indicators in the Water Resources Management Sector

  • Balázs M. Fekete
  • Eugene Z. Stakhiv
Chapter
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Governance, i.e., the institutional administrative component of water resources management, in particular and natural resources management in general, is an increasingly complex endeavor that forms the basis of integrated water resources management. Hence, it is very difficult to assess the performance of numerous adopted policy decisions and regulations that guide future water management adjustments. A myriad of interconnected aspirational goals, embedded within various well-intentioned UN Declarations, address desired water resources management improvements (efficiency, productivity) as a mechanism to support a wide variety of economic, social, ecological and cultural objectives. A wide array of performance indicators has been developed to track the relative effectiveness of these policies on water use productivity and efficiency. Any useful water resources management performance index must start with an accurate specification of available resources at various water resources management accounting level (country, region, river basins, etc.). Traditionally, water resources accounting was carried out via statistical surveys (e.g., FAO-AQUASTATS). A major step forward is deploying high resolution hydrological data assimilation along with geographical information systems to develop water resources assessment and link those data to spatially distributed socio-economic information.It is difficult enough to accurately describe the core state variables of a water management system, such as annual renewable water resources at national and river basin scales. The complexity and uncertainty magnifies when these state variables are used in composite indices to assess the performance of a diverse assortment of water related investments, or the relative effectiveness of institutional reforms on various components of the water sector (irrigation, water supply, hydropower, etc.). Single indicators are clearly inadequate to guide different aspects of the water management. Composite indices, such as the Water Poverty Index (WPI) or the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), which combine aspirational goals with state variables, skew the evaluation outcomes. Furthermore, indices applied uniformly to regions or countries with vastly different hydro-climatological, geographical and socio-economical conditions are prone to lead to misleading comparison.This chapter offers an overview of some of the indicator systems used in the past and discusses some of the challenges in producing resources management indicators. The paper outlines a conceptual framework for indicators that are suitable to guide both water management planning and evaluation of the implementations.

Keywords

Water Resource Management Water Sector Water Security Governance Indicator Environmental Sustainability Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnell NW (1999) Climate change and global water resources. Glob Environ Change 9:S31–S49Google Scholar
  2. Arnell NW (2010) Hydrology and global environmental change. In: Malone TF, Roederer JG (eds) Global environment change. Pearson, Cambridge, UK, pp 4–6Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner A, Reichel E (1975) The world water balance. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai XL, Molden D, Mainuddin M et al (2011) Producing more food with less water in a changing world: assessment of water productivity in 10 major river basins. Water Int 36:42–62. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2011.542403 Google Scholar
  5. Chenoweth J (2008) A re-assessment of indicators of national water scarcity. Water Int 33:5–18. doi: 10.1080/02508060801927994 Google Scholar
  6. Davie JCS, Falloon PD, Kahana R et al (2013) Comparing projections of future changes in runoff from hydrological and biome models in ISI-MIP. Earth Syst Dyn 4:359–374. doi: 10.5194/esd-4-359-2013 Google Scholar
  7. Dai A, Qian T, Trenberth KE (2009) Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. J Climat 22:2773–2792Google Scholar
  8. Falkenmark BYM (1986) Fresh water-time for a modified approach. AMBIO 15:192–200Google Scholar
  9. Fekete BM, Looser U, Robarts RD (2012) Rationale for monitoring discharge on the ground. J Hydrometeorol 13:1977–1986Google Scholar
  10. Fekete BM, Stakhiv EZ (2013) Water management preparation strategies for adaptation to changing climate. In: Charles R, Kumagai M, Robarts RD (eds) Climate change and global warming of inland waters: Impacts and mitigation for ecosystems and societies, 3rd edn. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  11. Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Grabs W (2002) High-resolution fields of global runoff combining observed river discharge and simulated water balances. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16(15):1–6. doi: 10.1029/1999GB001254 Google Scholar
  12. Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Roads JO, Willmott CJ (2004) Uncertainties in precipitation and their impacts on runoff estimates. J Climatol 17:294–303Google Scholar
  13. Grabs W, de Couet T, Pauler J (1996) Freshwater fluxes from the continents into the world oceans based on data of the global runoff data base. Global Runoff Data Centre, KoblenzGoogle Scholar
  14. Grey D, Sadoff CW (2007) Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 9:545. doi: 10.2166/wp.2007.021 Google Scholar
  15. Haddeland I, Clark DB, Franssen W et al (2011) Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. J Hydrometeorol 12(5):869–884. doi:  10.1175/2011JHM1324.1
  16. Hannah DM, Demuth S, van Lanen HAJ et al (2010) Large-scale river flow archives: importance, current status and future needs. Hydrol Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7794 Google Scholar
  17. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077
  18. Kemp-Benedict E, Cook S, Allen SL et al (2011) Connections between poverty, water and agriculture: evidence from 10 river basins. Water Int 36:125–140Google Scholar
  19. Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins WD et al (2001) The NCEP/NCAR 50-year reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and Documentation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:247–267. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082
  20. Korzoun VI, Sokolov AA, Budyko MI et al (1978) Atlas of the world water balance. Gidrometeoizdat, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  21. L’vovich MI, White GF, Belyaev AV et al (1990) Use and transformation of terrestrial water systems. In: Turner BL, Clack WC, Kates RW et al (eds) Earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA, pp 235–252Google Scholar
  22. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574Google Scholar
  23. Oki T, Musiake K, Matsuyama H, Masuda K (1995) Global atmospheric water balance and runoff from large river basins. Hydrol Process 9:655–678Google Scholar
  24. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 Google Scholar
  25. Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271(2):785–788Google Scholar
  26. Saleth RM, Dinar A (2004) The institutional economics of water: a cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Schewe J, Heinke J, Gerten D et al (2013) Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci U.S.A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222460110 Google Scholar
  28. Schiermeier Q (2012) Models hone picture of climate impacts. Nature 482:286. doi: 10.1038/482286a Google Scholar
  29. Schlosser CA, Houser PR (2007) Assessing a satellite-era perspective of the global water cycle, J Climate 20:1316–1338Google Scholar
  30. Shiklomanov IA (2000) Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int 25:11–32Google Scholar
  31. Shiklomanov IA, Rodda JC (2002) World water resources at the beginning of the 21st century. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Sullivan CA (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30:1195–1210Google Scholar
  33. Sullivan CA, Meigh J (2003) Considering the water poverty index in the context of poverty alleviation. Water Policy 5:513–528Google Scholar
  34. Syed TH, Famiglietti JS, Chambers DP et al (2010) Satellite-based global-ocean mass balance estimates of interannual variability and emerging trends in continental freshwater discharge. Proc Nat Acad Sci U.S.A 107:17916–17921Google Scholar
  35. Turton AR, Warner JF (2002) Exploring the population/water resources nexus in the developing world. The Woodrow Wilson Institute, Washington, DC, p 52–82Google Scholar
  36. UNDP (1990) Human Development Report 1990. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)Google Scholar
  37. Vörösmarty CJ, Askew A, Barry RG et al (2001) Global water data: a newly endangered species. AGU EOS Trans 82:54, 56, 58Google Scholar
  38. Wisser D, Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Schumann AH (2010) Reconstructing 20th century global hydrography: A contribution to the Global Terrestrial Network- Hydrology (GTN-H). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(1):1–24. doi:  10.5194/hess-14-1-2010

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThe City College of New York, CUNY Environmental CrossRoads Initiative, CUNY CREST Institute, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.UNESCO International Center for Integrated Water Resources Management (ICIWaRM), Department of Geography and Environmental EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations